It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 2012, The Weather Channel announced that it will be naming “noteworthy winter storms,” just as tropical storms are named. “The fact is,” writes Tom Nizioli on The Weather Channel’s website, “a storm with a name is easier to follow, which will mean fewer surprises and more preparation.”
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: seasonal
*shrug* weather nerds freak out over weather.
originally posted by: GreyScale
a reply to: seasonal
In 2012, The Weather Channel announced that it will be naming “noteworthy winter storms,” just as tropical storms are named. “The fact is,” writes Tom Nizioli on The Weather Channel’s website, “a storm with a name is easier to follow, which will mean fewer surprises and more preparation.”
Link
There are pros and cons to it. I live in Montana. We just call what's happening "winter". But the Weather Channel needs more excitement then that! So here we are.
Edited to add... the perfect username to ask this question. S&F for you!
Winter storm naming in the United States has been used since the mid 1700s in various ways to describe historical winter storms.
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: seasonal
LoL, 3-6 inches......
Wake me when its 3-6 feet.
Society in general has been dumbed down to be dependent whimps.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: seasonal
Seriously, though, some places are not prepared for 3-6 inches and it depends on the wind and how many inches per hour or if it's all ice.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: seasonal
LoL, 3-6 inches......
Wake me when its 3-6 feet.
Society in general has been dumbed down to be dependent whimps.
Ha! wake me at 10 ft, lol. We both now what that is like.
Seriously, though, some places are not prepared for 3-6 inches and it depends on the wind and how many inches per hour or if it's all ice.
More warning is better. I don't mind the names.
originally posted by: stosh64
originally posted by: GreyScale
a reply to: seasonal
In 2012, The Weather Channel announced that it will be naming “noteworthy winter storms,” just as tropical storms are named. “The fact is,” writes Tom Nizioli on The Weather Channel’s website, “a storm with a name is easier to follow, which will mean fewer surprises and more preparation.”
Link
There are pros and cons to it. I live in Montana. We just call what's happening "winter". But the Weather Channel needs more excitement then that! So here we are.
Edited to add... the perfect username to ask this question. S&F for you!
I live a little north of Buffalo and I just have to smile everytime we get new names for winter storms.
Like the POLAR VORTEX!
HEH, like you said, its winter.
My child hood winters were MUCH worse. I have pictures from numerous years of us kids shoveling the driveway up over 6 foot banks. We would play hockey in the driveway and check people into the banks on either side.
We haven't had 6 foot banks by the driveway in a couple decades! We had AWESOME snow forts too!
Everyone gets so uptight about everything now that used to be called 'life'.