It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to a breakdown of expenses contained on the fund’s website, Stein paid nearly $1 million on consultants and staff. The staff payroll tallied $212,500 while consultants pocketed $364,000. Administrative expenses, such as travel costs, ran $353,618. In all, $930,118 was used to pay consultants, staff, and administrative costs
originally posted by: mobiusmale
And so, if there was ever any doubt that Jill Stein's recount effort was about anything other than money for her and her cronies...
According to a breakdown of expenses contained on the fund’s website, Stein paid nearly $1 million on consultants and staff. The staff payroll tallied $212,500 while consultants pocketed $364,000. Administrative expenses, such as travel costs, ran $353,618. In all, $930,118 was used to pay consultants, staff, and administrative costs
Travel costs of $353,618? How much are plane tickets these days...or maybe Jill just bought herself a plane.
And the Consultants that advised her on this completely useless adventure pocketed $364,000...I wonder how much of that was actually for unpaid bills from her equally useless Presidential campaign.
PT Barnum has nothing on Stein!
They don't call it the Green Party for nothing
originally posted by: schuyler
One thing that strikes me as odd about this is that the Libertarians and Johnson far out-stripped the Green Party in votes, yet all we hear about is Stein and not a peep out of Johnson. And it was Stein's votes, which were far more than the difference between Clinton and Trump in key states, that threw the election to Trump. There's a very good case to be made that Nader gave us Bush and Stein gave us Trump. You can talk about "voting your conscience" until you're blue in the face, but that is effectively what happened.
originally posted by: schuyler
One thing that strikes me as odd about this is that the Libertarians and Johnson far out-stripped the Green Party in votes, yet all we hear about is Stein and not a peep out of Johnson. And it was Stein's votes, which were far more than the difference between Clinton and Trump in key states, that threw the election to Trump. There's a very good case to be made that Nader gave us Bush and Stein gave us Trump. You can talk about "voting your conscience" until you're blue in the face, but that is effectively what happened.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: schuyler
Going by that logic, really it's the 80-90 million eligible voters that didn't vote who swayed the election for Trump. And remember, Trump only got close to 63 million votes nationwide compared to almost 66 million for Hillary. They could've completely changed the elections at the State and local level, too.