It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: xuenchen
Those numbers don't add up. Who are they hiring? $1 billion over 4 years is $250 million/year. $250 million only buys you about 1250 engineers but they're claiming 6250 people per year.
Sounds to me like a lot of very low paying positions. In fact, 25,000 people into 1 billion is only $40,000 per person. Not even an actual middle class wage.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
originally posted by: 3daysgone
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: xuenchen
Those numbers don't add up. Who are they hiring? $1 billion over 4 years is $250 million/year. $250 million only buys you about 1250 engineers but they're claiming 6250 people per year.
Sounds to me like a lot of very low paying positions. In fact, 25,000 people into 1 billion is only $40,000 per person. Not even an actual middle class wage.
Maybe they are planning on making parts here in America. That is a great wage for making parts. $40k a year is not bad money.
40k here in California is the equivalent to 10K/yr almost everywhere else. a gallon of milk is 6$ USD in some places.
but i wish they wouldnt inflate their numbers just for rhetoric's sake. have a sound plan and outline it. it will still be better than what we have now minus all the special effects.
go Trump.
originally posted by: Maxatoria
IBM's in a transitional period, its not the big blue of old where everything was made by them, they're slowly moving out of the actual physical production of systems and more into a sort of consultancy where what you want will be done for you as seen by the fact they've signed up to partner with Apple.
So while they want 25k people for certain tasks i'd imagine those on the iseries/Zos etc will be worried that they could be let off as mainframe shops finally decide to use newer tech