welfare rort

just watching the news in Sydney Australia and the government has revealed it is actually paying welfare to muslims with more than wife> this is against our constitution. honestly if I went there and did this I would be jailed by the government for fraud . their reasoning was that its cheaper than paying them as separate families . how about taking care of pensioners and soldiers with ptsd first instead of giving money to people who will not work as long as we give them welfare and this is now a generational issue .one situation I know is fact is a case where 3 wives with more than 3 kids each and all pregnant again are claiming the cant take care of their kids so the government offers foster care which they now get their mothers to foster care for the kids with a payment of course so now the family rakes in more money than a hardworking family makes . very disappointing day

a reply to: babalon1971

I can not count the number of X-pats who have complained how their countries are providing for the new arrivals while letting their own citizens (who have worked for and in their countries all their lives) get less than 1/3 of what their governments are giving the immigrants...

a reply to: babalon1971

Agree with you 100% on this, there has to be an underlining motive here!

My grandparents migrated here to Australia and worked their asses off, they helped build this country, by offering welfare you're only going to attract the unwanted, the ones that dont want to assimilate, Go Pauline Hanson!

Best way to solve this is to provide shelter and food rather than money, im sure all the hippies will be there volunteering for free. Eventually sheltered they will get jobs because staying in shelter is not very comfy

originally posted by: suvorov
Best way to solve this is to provide shelter and food rather than money, im sure all the hippies will be there volunteering for free. Eventually sheltered they will get jobs because staying in shelter is not very comfy

And lots of Bacon

a reply to: babalon1971

Well that is really screwed up.....Centrelink are cracking down hard on payments and drastically cutting staff and yet they carry on with this rubbish.....

a reply to: babalon1971

Yeah the kicker here in the US is all the refugees Australia refused to allow in because of background issues were shipped to and accepted by the US. It seems a countries laws only apply to certain people.

It reminds me of the Constitution in the book Animal Farm.

Everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.

originally posted by: muSSang

Go Pauline Hanson!

While I absolutely agree that Australian politics needs a huge reset and that the current lot needs to go, doesnt matter what party, I don't think Pauline "Please Explain" Hanson is the right choice.

She is an idiot, and that's putting it nicely. She might be right on some issues, but she is clueless on others that will have a detrimental effect on our country and the world.

Ive actually thought about entering politics myself and "Donald Trumping" my way to the top. I think Australia is ready to see this happen, whether it be me or someone else. Aussies have had it up to their eyeballs with the current Labor/Liberal/Green cluster#.

originally posted by: babalon1971
just watching the news in Sydney Australia and the government has revealed it is actually paying welfare to muslims with more than wife> this is against our constitution. honestly if I went there and did this I would be jailed by the government for fraud . their reasoning was that its cheaper than paying them as separate families . how about taking care of pensioners and soldiers with ptsd first instead of giving money to people who will not work as long as we give them welfare and this is now a generational issue .one situation I know is fact is a case where 3 wives with more than 3 kids each and all pregnant again are claiming the cant take care of their kids so the government offers foster care which they now get their mothers to foster care for the kids with a payment of course so now the family rakes in more money than a hardworking family makes . very disappointing day

Strange how its common for small time insignificant nobodies like us take the view that if I cant get something off govt others are getting then should not have it either.

Compare this to the rich who take the view that if someone else is getting something I'm not getting then I should get it too.?

Perhaps we should take the view that if mussos are allowed to claim welfare for multiple wives then perhaps we should learn from this and find a way to make it work for us, even its only in law.

a reply to: suvorov

Would it not be even far less expensive and expeditious to spend a one time amount to return these unneeded, unwanted people back to where they slithered out from, or at least to somewhere where they're ACTUALLY wanted? (That in itself appears to be a colossal joke!) Or at least mandate a limit to the number of litters allowed per brood sow's household, and/or at least institute mandatory birth control coverage (for BOTH sexes with the infuriating heights the instance of rape has reached) until the first option is carried out? What? Too disrespectful? Too awful in its insinuations? Sorry, but dictates/mandates using child bearing primarily as a means to conquer rational, civilized beings in order to wipe their culture out is as sickening as it is almost brilliant.That in itself is just another definition for a type of newly emerging Nazism, but to some seems to be much more acceptable than the one being thrown at people who simply refuse to bow to and embrace an isidious idealogy and/or its most ardent supporters; one so horrible/brutal it has been waged war upon century after CENTURY and yet continues to illogically enslave and brainwash certain people who remain so unaware that it continues even after 1400 Y E A R S! A type of mythological "Hydra" if you will, not unlike the equally mythical djinns whose existence is very much a reality to them even in this day.

Any country actively and openly denying its OWN CITIZENS in need of welfare that is by law their rightful due, in favor of interlopers who have a PROVEN bad and deadly track record bottoms out at every level of rational thinking. It bears mention that in doing so these overt actions call unbelievable attention to a lack of responsibility toward, and or loyalty for that which is a sworn duty to flag, country and CITIZENRY (Mom and apple pie too in case you haven't figured that out!)...and amounts to being nothing if not absolutely criminal!

WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO COMMON SENSE W O R L D W I D E?! Or has Webster's taken to inventing new definitions that tiptoe quietly past our Spidey senses these days?!