Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House

originally posted by: dr1234

originally posted by: Gothmog
Funny how the WaPo is reacting as the clinical definition of insane
Trying something over and over again , hoping someone will listen
OOOPS , sorry OP , I guess you did listen...

Off topic but I hate this myth. That is not the clinical definition of insanity.

In your opinion....

a reply to: Annee

www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/37826098?client=safari

Mr Clinton's own office at the UN found 9% of the foreign aid cash went to the Haitian government and 0.6% to local organisations.

The bulk of it went to UN agencies, international aid groups, private contractors and donor countries' own civilian and military agencies.

For example, the Pentagon billed the State Department hundreds of millions of dollars for sending US troops to hand out bottled water and keep order on the streets of Haiti's ravaged capital, Port-au-Prince.

www.m.huffpost.com...

Clinton Charities Refile 6 Years Of Tax Returns To Amend Errors
The charities have come under renewed scrutiny this year with Hillary Clinton's decision to seek the Democratic Party's nomination for the presidency.

www.thepoliticalinsider.com...

Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, a long-time Clinton insider and former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman, steered at least $675,000 to the election of the wife of an FBI official involved in the Clinton probe. McAuliffe’s political action committee gave $467,500 to the state senate campaign for FBI agent Andrew McCabe’s wife. He is now the deputy director of the FBI

www.nypost.com...

Chelsea Clinton used her family foundation’s cash to pay for her wedding, living expenses and taxes on gifts of cash from her parents, according to a bombshell email made public Sunday.

a reply to: Annee

I thought Bill and Hillary were lawyers?

www.adn.com...

Clinton charities ignore law requiring them to disclose millions from foreign donors

a reply to: neutronflux


NO - - not news stories.

Actual facts of wrong doing.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Annee

I thought Bill and Hillary were lawyers?

www.adn.com...

Clinton charities ignore law requiring them to disclose millions from foreign donors

I'm aware of the speculations.

a reply to: Annee

Bernard Sansaricq Exposes Clinton Foundation, Trump Town Hall - Miami Florida
youtu.be...

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Annee

Bernard Sansaricq Exposes Clinton Foundation, Trump Town Hall - Miami Florida
youtu.be...

So, you found someone who says what you want to hear.

Good for you.

a reply to: Annee

Your dismissing personal documents, eyewitness accounts, and victims accounts.

If they were against the GOP, you would label them heroic whistleblowers. Very ironic.

Glad I don't live with your conscience.

Didn't Hillary say all victims have a right to be heard. I guess aslong as you are not from Haiti are a victim of Bill.

Didn't Hillary conspire with Bill to discret and silence Bill's harassment victims?

a reply to: Annee

www.dailywire.com...

6 People/Countries That Bought Favors From Hillary Clinton

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: neutronflux


NO - - not news stories.

Actual facts of wrong doing.

Forced to refile six years of taxes is documented wrong doing.

It is documented Hillary lied about having classified material on a private server.

It is documented Hillary was privately trafficking classified material. Documented she gave access to persons without proper clearances.

It is documented Hillary allowed persons on her staff with no security clearances to handle state secrets. Also, by law, it's just not about clearance. You also have to have the need to know.

It is documented Hillary did not archive her time as Secretary of State as required by law.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Indigo5

Or Jeil Storm backed by Soros / Clinton demanding a recount with NO proof of election hacking.


By the why, were is the outrage over Soros trying to buy elections?

Different topic...You want an investigation into Soros...go for it..I think any investigation that examines actual evidence objectively and thoroughly is GOOD.

Now explain to me why you want to discount or ignore the CLEAR MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE tracing the DNC hack to Russian FSB.

It was illegal. Again, how is Russia any different than a reporter exposing corruption and not revealing their source? The exposed corruption influencing the election.


Again it's illegal. But I have to wonder people confusing DNC hacks of private citizens for and implied false narrative attack on government IT? The DNC is not the US government.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Annee

Your dismissing personal documents, eyewitness accounts, and victims accounts.

No, I'm not.

It's politics. Politicians say anything. Often to protect their own ass. ALL of them.

People say anything. People believe anything. Seen it here on ATS.

Until you have confirmed facts, its speculation. Hearsay is NOT confirmed facts.

And "shady", "opportunistic", "favoritism", is not necessarily illegal. It possibly could be, but you'd have to prove the illegal part.

Beware of believing something - - because you want to.

originally posted by: Kettu
Well, I already make a mean borscht with pork...

There's a well-known Russian book in circulation that predicted and even gives a glimpse into the inner workings of the Russian geopolitical agenda. It's a textbook, if you will -- a cheat sheet for Russian officials on what would be best for Russia moving forward. It's called, "The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia"

Here, let's all take a look together and learn something:

The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia is a geopolitical book by Alexander Dugin. The book has had a large influence within the Russian military, police, and foreign policy elites[1] and was allegedly used as a textbook in the General Staff Academy of Russian military.[1]

So, what's the basic premise?

The book declares that "the battle for the world rule of [ethnic] Russians" has not ended and Russia remains "the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution."

Wow, anti-American revolution eh? With bombs and missiles? Tanks and guns? Nope:

Military operations play relatively little role. The textbook believes in a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded by the Russian special services. The operations should be assisted by a tough, hard-headed utilization of Russia's gas, oil, and natural resources to bully and pressure other countries.

What does it say about the UK?

United Kingdom should be cut off from Europe.

Wow, Brexit anyone? That's kind of creepy...What about the USA? That's a hot button issue. What does this highly prized and studied Russian book say about the USA?

Russia should use its special forces within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism. For instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics."

Wikipedia

Well now now...doesn't that sound awfully familiar? That reads like Putin's very own football playbook. It sure seems to me that a road map for Russian actives has already been outline for a while now.

The puzzle pieces keep falling into place, and the picture just gets bigger and bigger...

I need to get to planting those beets. I have a feeling I might be needing to brush up on my borscht recipe here soon.

Everyone needs to read the above at least ten times.

Eta - shoot the internal quotes don't appear so this seems out of context. I will try pasting them below.

The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia is a geopolitical book by Alexander Dugin. The book has had a large influence within the Russian military, police, and foreign policy elites[1] and was allegedly used as a textbook in the General Staff Academy of Russian military.[1]

Russia should use its special forces within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism. For instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics."

Wikipedia

originally posted by: neutronflux

It is documented Hillary lied about having classified material on a private server.

Leave the emails out of this.

You made several accusations that were not about the emails.

It is not unusual during an audit for any corporation, business, non-profit, or even an individual to have errors in their tax return. In fact I think its quite common.

I know - - I got docked for $1500 five years after filing. Can't remember what it was for, but it was an over site - - with no intent.

The only illegal part would be in not correcting it.

Trump should be held to the same scrutiny as Hillary.

His charity is actually fake. And that is documented.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Who cares? Satan would be better than clinton!

originally posted by: sycomix
a reply to: theantediluvian

Who cares? Satan would be better than clinton!

Is this from your own personal investigation of Hillary?

Or from listening to anti-Hillary mouth pieces?

originally posted by: Annee

His charity is actually fake. And that is documented.

To use your own words.....

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: neutronflux

NO - - not news stories.

Actual facts of wrong doing.

Or better, your personal on the ground investigation of Trump and questioning of witnesses?

a reply to: Annee

www.nypost.com...

Title: Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’

The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.


“It seems like the Clinton Foundation operates as a slush fund for the Clintons,” said Bill Allison, a senior fellow at the Sunlight Foundation, a government watchdog group where progressive Democrat and Fordham Law professor Zephyr Teachout was once an organizing director.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Annee

His charity is actually fake. And that is documented.

To use your own words.....

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: neutronflux

NO - - not news stories.

Actual facts of wrong doing.

Or better, your personal on the ground investigation of Trump and questioning of witnesses?

Trump's charity is FAKE. That is fact.

That is not speculation.

Instead of collecting money people owed him, he had them donate it to his charity. Money laundering - - - he didn't pay taxes on it.

He used money from his charity to donate to a political campaign. He had to pay a fine because its illegal.

He is guilty of self-dealing. Buying stuff from his charity for his own gain. That is fact.

His charity was not legally registered. That is fact.

Of course, he can buy his way out of all that - - - just like he did Trump University.