It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by quango
12 years and no war and no WMDs
i'd rather all the money in the world pass under the table if it helps keep the peace. and guess what? it was.
Originally posted by BeefotronX
I'd say I can't believe I just read this, but I'd be lying.
There have been a number of incidents where small caches of chemical weapons were found. Just last May a sarin bomb was used against US forces. (largely unsuccessful--nobody died) So, Saddam managed to dispose of most of the weapons. He had them before, and we know because he used them. So what if he disposed of them in the months before the invasion? He did that because he was afraid. Even if he had hidden, sold, or otherwise disposed of everything, he only did so because he was afraid of the USA. He thought maybe he could have gotten off the hook that way. Sorry, but no. While we got him to get rid of his WMD without an invasion (yet), he was still a tyrant who spent ridiculous sums of money on big palaces while terrorizing his own people. He still had a whole nation at his disposal, a nation largely composed of normal people not so different from us, people who did not deserve to have such a government, people whose will to fight back was squelched when their rebellions in 1991 failed. As far as I'm concerned, saving 25 million people from a tyrant is one of the finest reasons possible.
Containment is not peace. When the kitchen is on fire and you close the doors into the kitchen, you might save the house but everything inside the room is probably going to be destroyed. Then again, you have no guarantee it's going to stop at the kitchen, especially if you don't call the fire department. I went into a metaphor there, excuse me. There is no peace when a tyrant is in a position of power, there cannot be peace, there must not be peace, because things are not going to get better by leaving tyrants in place. They will continue to prey upon their own people even if they are not permitted to prey on anyone else. These people must be stopped, and many of them won't stop until they die. So what if there may be a few other reasons? It is this reason that makes it all worth it. I'll denounce some of the less worthy justifications right along with you, but never forget the important one.
Originally posted by fourth horseman
Devil wasp be careful where you tread...
Man I bought some shoes ECCO's, made in Scotland!!! Man they are awsome!! Why would nike want to make shoes in Tiawan or Korea/??
Originally posted by devilwasp
Is that why the US CIA said that there was NO , i repeat NO weapons of mass destruction in iraq before and after iraq.
How are we able to justify going into another country and telling THEM how to live?
Please if you think we are the Creme de la Creme of the world you are very much mistaken.
Originally posted by GI_WOLVES
Devilwasp, it saddens me that my family left Scotland and Ireland many years ago. Now I know why.
Originally posted by BeefotronX
Why the obstruction of the inspections? Does it really take five weeks to Swiffer the floor of the baby formula factory? While it is believed that no new WMDs have been built in Iraq since 1992,
Saddam was working towards restarting production of chemical weapons in Iraq. Did we or did we not prevent him from doing this? If he did rebuild his chemical arsenal, what are the odds that he would use it for humane purposes? And again, we cannot rule out the possibility that there are WMDs just because they're not in Iraq.
WMD's aside. They weren't the only reason for going into Iraq, despite Babs Boxer's simplistic assertions to the contrary.
I wasn't aware we were telling them how to live. Unless you consider "letting them tell themselves how to live" telling them how to live.
The USA is far from perfect. Our presidents, congressmen, military, judges, and all other government officials are human beings (You guys from the UFO/alien threads shut up) and are by their natures incapable of doing everything right. Though the USA is made of imperfect people, it is founded on perfect ideals. It made its way to the top of the world because liberty has made its people powerful, making the nation powerful. And with that power comes responsibility. With all the liberty we stuck ourselves with, it was only a matter of time before the rest of the world got stuck with American hegemony. Resent it all you want, but consider how things got to be this way.
You want to call the USA imperialist? Look back to the aftermath of World War II. The whole world was devastated, and the USA came out of that war with the world's most powerful navy, a battle-hardened military, and the atomic bomb. We could have had our way with any nation anywhere with nobody to stop us.
We didn't. We helped rebuild, and then we went home. You want something more modern? Try the first Gulf War. We saved Kuwait and could have taken whatever we wanted. They were probably grateful enough to give it up. We didn't take any oil though. We put out the fires and went home. Creme of the world indeed.
[edit on 1/28/2005 by BeefotronX]
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by GI_WOLVES
my family left Scotland and Ireland many years ago.
Difficult to leave 2 countries at the same time mate....
Originally posted by BeefotronX
people whose will to fight back was squelched when their rebellions in 1991 failed.
Containment is not peace.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Uh .. no it's not. My family left Ireland AND England.
Two countries .... My grandmother (Flanagans) left Ireland
and my grandfather (Lathropes) left England.
My husband's family left three countries ... Switzerland,
France, and Italy. One Grandpa left France. One Grandma
left Switzerland. Other Grandpa left Italy.
from devilwasp
Firstly the scotsman gets its information from who?
The MOD, and where does the MOD get its information from? MI5 and MI6 both declared after that they where wrong.
Also before sep11 colin powell publically , i just watched the statement on the programe farenhieght 9/11 , that "iraq has not restarted its WMD program."
You come and ENFORCE democracy, how do you know they want this!
Then the USA has no buisness in going into soverign nations and telling them how to run their country.
If liberty is what you stand for then your country should respect the liberty of other nations , the liberty of soverignty.
With a UN task force sitting there, might want to remember that little fact pal, our forces where on the same front lines as yours.
Also how exsactly would the US have been able to take the oil with out the UN knowing? They couldnt thats the point, the fact is that with its position right american oil companies now have the opertunity to get all the oil they want.
Why the obstruction of the inspections? Does it really take five weeks to Swiffer the floor of the baby formula factory? While it is believed that no new WMDs have been built in Iraq since 1992,
Saddam was working towards restarting production of chemical weapons in Iraq. Did we or did we not prevent him from doing this? If he did rebuild his chemical arsenal, what are the odds that he would use it for humane purposes?
WMD's aside. They weren't the only reason for going into Iraq, despite Babs Boxer's simplistic assertions to the contrary.
It made its way to the top of the world because liberty has made its people powerful, making the nation powerful.
The whole world was devastated, and the USA came out of that war with the world's most powerful navy, a battle-hardened military, and the atomic bomb. We could have had our way with any nation anywhere with nobody to stop us. We didn't. We helped rebuild, and then we went home.
Look at a dictionary. Letting the people have the government they want is democracy.
Thousands of people rose up to overthrow Saddam, except they failed because we listened to the UN and didn't go in to back them up.
Originally posted by BeefotronX
That is correct. Iraq's WMD program was on hiatus since 1992. They were trying to restart the program, though. Saddam believed the sanctions would lapse soon, and then he could restart his WMD program. What he was doing was preparing for that, so that when he could restart the WMD program, it could start rapidly. Why else was he playing these games with the UN inspectors?
Look at a dictionary. Letting the people have the government they want is democracy.
No!
It is about individual liberty. I am talking about people. In Iraq, there are 25 million of them. The fact that Saddam and his henchmen had a government that was legitimate in appearance did not legitimize their tyranny. Voting against Saddam was suicide--often literally.
We could have requested a little payment for our services in the form of oil. What position would they be in to refuse?
Except that we don't just take the oil. We give money in exchange for it, and that is how things have continued.
We are now in a position to get all the oil we want, and guess what? We do. We pay for it, too. Don't forget this is the same UN that refused to follow through with an invasion of Iraq. Thousands of people rose up to overthrow Saddam, except they failed because we listened to the UN and didn't go in to back them up.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Kennedy never learned the Vietnam lesson, did he?
(Friggn' drunk egomaniac lunkhead! - and I'm being nice!!)
Originally posted by devilwasp
Please refresh me on YOUR version of history since it doesnt seem to coincide with mine or the documented version of events.
Originally posted by BeefotronX
All you have to do is point me to the oil that we are taking without paying for.