Florida Woman Arrested Calls Sandy Hook Massacre "HOAX", And Threatened To Kill Parent of a Victim

a reply to: Zeta Reticuli

You ever lost a child? My mum did and didn't act normal because grief and shock acts differently for each of us. An hour after my bro died we were all laughing and joking in a french pub...sure wasnt normal.
Would you have called her disgusting?.
I'm a mental health nurse and my job in my unit is to talk to our su's about death when they lose someone no one acts how you would expect.

a reply to: testingtesting

There are MANY inconsistencies in the event, the reaction of some parents was just one i found baffling as a parent myself. I have seen the interview of two parents who have been on other false flag scenes (separately)...how do you seriously explain that? THAT IS REAL no matter how much you want to deny it. I SAW their interview on TV then again online when ppl had started piecing it all together. Even if it happened, how anyone could pose as a grieving parent is F**KING BEYOND ME.

originally posted by: NerdGoddess
a reply to: Zeta Reticuli

I know what you're getting at, but I can't say I can tell you how I'd react unless it had happened to me.

-Alee

Watching family members pass away is heartbreaking but loosing a child is a whole new level.

The problem isn't that they don't research the topic...

The problem is that they DO research the topic... and they find things that convince them of the conspiracy.

This is all an attempt to get people to NOT research, and to just swallow whatever is spoon fed to you.

a reply to: Zeta Reticuli

Well, it sure doesn't help support the story when there are recognizable crisis actors on the scene that day.

One stupid conspiracy theory being explained by another stupid conspiracy theory.

a reply to: projectvxn

Prove it?

originally posted by: WeAre0ne
a reply to: projectvxn

Prove it?

I'm not the one making stupid claims.

a reply to: WeAre0ne

Thing is I dI'd research the topic and found all the conspiracy angle to be bunk. Just look at crisis actors debunked and sorry but their were not any. Like I said before within 30 mins many here were calling false flag because they were afraid they were going to takeep your guns...didn't happen.
So go on why was it a false flag? for what purpose?.
Why can't people accept some people are mentally unwell like the shooter and the woman in the op?.
Maybe you need help also for falling off bs youtube videos.

originally posted by: AutonomousMind
I feel there is some agenda to take down "conspiracy theorist's" or make them look crazy.

Generally speaking, making conspiracy theorists look crazy doesn't require an agenda. Tinfoil hat has been part of the lexicon for decades.

originally posted by: WeAre0ne
The problem isn't that they don't research the topic...

The problem is that they DO research the topic... and they find things that convince them of the conspiracy.

Unfortunately, the reason they find things that convince them is related more closely to what's happening in their own minds than to anything in the real world.

a reply to: FlyingFox

They are always looking for an escape goat

That one escaped, but they have plenty of these: scapegoat's

originally posted by: Redback

originally posted by: NerdGoddess
a reply to: Zeta Reticuli

I know what you're getting at, but I can't say I can tell you how I'd react unless it had happened to me.

-Alee

Watching family members pass away is heartbreaking but loosing a child is a whole new level.

I pray to the universe every day that my son stays healthy and safe, and that decades from now, I will pass before him. Oh I just think it would destroy me if something ever happened to him.

a reply to: WeAre0ne

Because at the core of it, a lot of people are ..hmm, misguided..to be polite, armchair internet detectives/behavioral psychologist's. They will grasp a grain of sand and proclaim it a beach.
Truth is stranger than fiction.

a reply to: projectvxn

You just claimed it was one stupid conspiracy theory being explained by another stupid conspiracy theory.

Prove it.

originally posted by: WeAre0ne
a reply to: projectvxn

You just claimed it was one stupid conspiracy theory being explained by another stupid conspiracy theory.

Prove it.

I don't think you know how this works.

a reply to: projectvxn

No I'm pretty sure you are trying to shift "the burden of proof" because one day you heard someone say "you can't prove a negative" so you are banking on that idea without knowing you are creating an "argument from ignorance" which is a logical fallacy.

You are asserting that something is false because it hasn't been proven to be true.

You are claiming something is a conspiracy. Prove it... Otherwise, you can see yourself out of this conversation.

It is you that doesn't know how this works.

a reply to: WeAre0ne

That's cute.

You're asking me to prove a that a conspiracy that hasn't been proven is a conspiracy.

That's called a circular argument and you have the nerve to bring up logical fallacies?

You're ridiculous.

Have fun with your retarded conspiracy theory.

a reply to: projectvxn

I simply asked you to prove that it is a conspiracy, that its not true.

What part of that don't you understand?

originally posted by: WeAre0ne
a reply to: projectvxn

I simply asked you to prove that it is a conspiracy, that its not true.

What part of that don't you understand?

You want me to prove your retarded conspiracy theory that Sandy Hook was a hoax?

I'm not making the claim so it isn't on me to do so.

originally posted by: WeAre0ne
a reply to: projectvxn

No I'm pretty sure you are trying to shift "the burden of proof" because one day you heard someone say "you can't prove a negative" so you are banking on that idea without knowing you are creating an "argument from ignorance" which is a logical fallacy.

You are asserting that something is false because it hasn't been proven to be true.

You are claiming something is a conspiracy. Prove it... Otherwise, you can see yourself out of this conversation.

It is you that doesn't know how this works.

So you're saying you can't prove it?