It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The University of Leicester found 83 skeletons in a Roman graveyard dating back as early as the 2nd Century. Six with possible African ancestry is the first evidence of migrants from the continent in the city, experts said. Leicester is one of the UK's most diverse cities, with half its population described as white British compared to 80% nationally
Mathew Morris, project supervisor, said it showed Leicester's multiculturalism was not confined to recent decades.
The remains, dating between the 2nd and 4th Century, were discovered during a series of excavations between 2010 and 2015 at a former factory site in Western Road.
However, the university said some bodies were buried with grave goods or exhibit burial customs not previously seen in the city.
Mr Morris said six had African cranial features but "excitingly" two of them, one a child, appear to have been born in England.
He said by studying their teeth the team was able to tell what type of water they drank and where in the country it originated.
Through this process, known as isotope analysis, they can chart migration.
The archaeologist said one of the people was probably born in the Pennines area and the other in Leicester itself.
www.bbc.com...
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: Spider879
Yes, Britain was taken over by an empire which included parts of Africa, and was therefore in a position to bring in African soldiers.
Graveyards in India and parts of Africa would contain skeletons which had white European links, for much the same reason.
The use of the word "migrant", while technically valid, is a little tendentious and misleading. They would not have been "migrants" in the sense being used in current politics.
The most famous of these legends is that of Moorish stonemasons being brought back from the crusades by Orm of Biddulph.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
The use of the word "migrant", while technically valid, is a little tendentious and misleading. They would not have been "migrants" in the sense being used in current politics.
originally posted by: Anaana
originally posted by: DISRAELI
The use of the word "migrant", while technically valid, is a little tendentious and misleading. They would not have been "migrants" in the sense being used in current politics.
The Roman military ranks were notoriously assimilative though, intermarrying with local girls and settling down on retirement where they had been posted rather than going 'home', either way, as armies do, they will have left their genetic mark on the country whether they themselves stayed or not, culturally, much less so.