It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: carewemust
I was watching the news this morning and am seeing that Taiwan is the one who called Trump. It almost seemed like the MSM is making it like Trump called them. They called and said congratulations. If China wants to nuke us for someone answering a phone call then so be it. We don't need to exists as a species if it has come to this. Rather childish if you ask me. But nobody asked me. So its just my .02 cents.
originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: Jay-morris
There it is again... challenge Trump and his minions, rather than defend him on the merits, HAVE to go to the 'But Hillary...' defense because you can't defend him. "But Hillary...' is all you have. I dare you. Go back through the Trump threads and EVERY time someone challenges his awesomeness the very next post will be 'But Hillary...' Pathetic.
originally posted by: carewemust
Friday, December 2, 2016
President-elect Trump spoke with the Taiwanese president today. Since China hates Taiwan, and Donald Trump has been badmouthing China for many years, for unfair trade practices, do you think that he had this conversation with Tsai lng-wen intentionally, just to say F-You (middle finger) to China?
originally posted by: carewemust
Saturday, December 3, 2016
China must think that the USA operates like their sorry system. This evening, China filed a formal complaint over Trump's conversation with the Taiwanese President. And they're ratting him out to President Obama, so Obama can have Trump boiled in oil, like they do with those who step out of line.
CNN's latest Trump Witch-hunt: www.cnn.com...
originally posted by: buster2010
Seeing the business he does with China he is more likely hoping China doesn't give him the middle finger.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: yuppa
Sometimes, I think I have seen too much or lived too long. I clearly remember when Nixon went to China and how excited and happy everyone was.
originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: Jay-morris
Nope. I won't ignore it. Go to any Trump thread and as soon as anyone questions his almightiness the very next post will be 'Hillary is worse'. Hillary was not an option, in my book, but the people defending Trump never defend him on the merits. They immediately go to 'better than Hillary'. But the fact is, we don't really know that yet, do we? People assume that but we've yet to see what Trump and his entourage are going to do. My argument is that continuing to attack Hillary as a defense of Trump is not only pointless (News Flash: Hillary lost) but it's deflective. It's like saying, 'well the Crypts are worse' as one of the Bloods abducts your daughter.
originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: Jay-morris
Nope. I won't ignore it. Go to any Trump thread and as soon as anyone questions his almightiness the very next post will be 'Hillary is worse'. Hillary was not an option, in my book, but the people defending Trump never defend him on the merits. They immediately go to 'better than Hillary'. But the fact is, we don't really know that yet, do we? People assume that but we've yet to see what Trump and his entourage are going to do. My argument is that continuing to attack Hillary as a defense of Trump is not only pointless (News Flash: Hillary lost) but it's deflective. It's like saying, 'well the Crypts are worse' as one of the Bloods abducts your daughter.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
Go to any Trump thread and as soon as anyone questions his almightiness the very next post will be 'Hillary is worse'.
I actually only brought this up because there were so many anti trump threads saying how bad he is, yet the same people completly ignoring what Hillary has done. I find that very hypocritical.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: AMPTAH
Oh BS.
DALLAS — I am a Republican presidential elector, one of the 538 people asked to choose officially the president of the United States. Since the election, people have asked me to change my vote based on policy disagreements with Donald J. Trump. ... The election of the next president is not yet a done deal. Electors of conscience can still do the right thing for the good of the country. Presidential electors have the legal right and a constitutional duty to vote their conscience. ... During the campaign more than 50 Republican former national security officials and foreign policy experts co-signed a letter opposing him. In their words, “he would be a dangerous president.” During the campaign Mr. Trump even said Russia should hack Hillary Clinton’s emails. This encouragement of an illegal act has troubled many members of Congress and troubles me. ... Fifteen years ago, I swore an oath to defend my country and Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. On Dec. 19, I will do it again.