It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CB328
Does the government measure unemployment any differently than when Bush or other recent Presidents were in office?
If not, why were they not attacked and accused of lying, only Obama is???
originally posted by: carewemust
December 2, 2016
This is INSANE! As of the end of November, a whopping 95.06 MILLION Americans are out of the labor force.
Source Article: www.msn.com...
Since there are 244 million adult citizens in the USA, does this mean that 40% of them don't have a job? Or maybe they're sole proprietors, or working on a "cash" basis?
But, the UNEMPLOYMENT RATE is at a 9 year low, which is 4.6%.
Should President Obama get CREDIT, or BLAME for these latest employment figures?
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: marg6043
So the question should be why if we have low unemployment rates we got more people on welfare or receiving some kind of government benefit.
Because some people believe that it's not your employers responsibility to pay you a wage where you can afford food.
originally posted by: EvillerBob
Because it isn't. It's their responsibility to pay you what they think you're worth and what you're prepared to accept.
Businesses run for the benefit of the business, not the employees. You're joining a company, not a church.
originally posted by: carewemust
December 2, 2016
This is INSANE! As of the end of November, a whopping 95.06 MILLION Americans are out of the labor force.
Source Article: www.msn.com...
Since there are 244 million adult citizens in the USA, does this mean that 40% of them don't have a job? Or maybe they're sole proprietors, or working on a "cash" basis?
But, the UNEMPLOYMENT RATE is at a 9 year low, which is 4.6%.
Should President Obama get CREDIT, or BLAME for these latest employment figures?
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: EvillerBob
Because it isn't. It's their responsibility to pay you what they think you're worth and what you're prepared to accept.
Businesses run for the benefit of the business, not the employees. You're joining a company, not a church.
It's to the benefit of a business to pay an employee a wage that allows them to eat.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: EvillerBob
The only food you can buy on $6.45 is extremely unhealthy.
originally posted by: Aazadan
The only food you can buy on $6.45 is extremely unhealthy.
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
Dunno about the US, but in the UK, real food - fresh meat, veg etc - is cheaper than living on fast food and "TV meals"
For example, in the UK you can easily cook a good wholesome meal for 4 adults for $6.45 (£5)
the problem is that many dont know how to cook ....
(maybe basic food costs are much higher in the US? I dont know)
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
originally posted by: Aazadan
The only food you can buy on $6.45 is extremely unhealthy.
Dunno about the US, but in the UK, real food - fresh meat, veg etc - is cheaper than living on fast food and "TV meals"
For example, in the UK you can easily cook a good wholesome meal for 4 adults for $6.45 (£5)
the problem is that many dont know how to cook ....
(maybe basic food costs are much higher in the US? I dont know)