It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
I wouldn't attack Iran, if I was the commander in chief, but I have a feeling W. just might. It will be a rude awakening when a carrier group vanishes off the radar screens, in a ball of heat and light that would make the sun jealous.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
America is capable of launching a ground war into Iran, as well. We could gather a force of 200,000 to get the job done. I can cout just 130,000 troops in Germany, South Korea, and Japan. None of those troops are exactly needed in those locations. If Iran was a serious threat, don't doubt for a second that America wouldn't start pulling in those troops.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
I don't think Iran is much bigger then France
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Iran today does not have a military of that size, nor do they have nearly as many tanks, or artillery pieces. The equipment isn't much better then what Iraq had, either. They really just modified T-72's. I don't know about you, but I don't think modified T-72's will fair too well against M1A2's.
I take it that geography isnt your strong point. Iran has over three times the land mass of France.
Can you give me the exact size of the Iraqi army, then we can discuss it. Remember that this "fourth largest army in the world" was pushed back by an Iran, who had disbanded its army several months before the war. The "fourth largest army in the world" was kicked out of Iran because of the sheer number of Iranians, which leads me to believe Iran has a bigger army. The tanks, well in a terrain like Iraq's are worthless. They have no place to go, its open desert in Iraq. Same with artilary, they left them in the middle of the desert. Iran has many places where it can hide its artilary. One more thing that Iraq didnt have was any sort of power in the water. Iran has some power. And Iran's infentry is equiped with short range man portable air diffences, which the Iraqis didnt have. Iranians actually have chemical and biological weapons, unlike Iraq. They have far greater missiles, both in quality and quantity. Their air defences are overall better. There is no doubt that you can bomb Iran, but you cannot invade it. But after you bombarded Iran the question is what the Iraqi shies would do, since the most repected religious leader in Iraq is Iranian. Then there is the rest of the world, how are they going to react? There is many things to consider, I am not a military genuis, but if invading Iran was this easy, there were many circumstances when Iran should have been invaded, the hostage crisis for example, why wasnt it?
By the summer of 1990, Iraq possessed 16,000 radar-guided and heatseeking surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), including the Soviet SA-2, SA-3, SA-6, SA-7, SA-8, SA-9, SA-13, SA-14, and SA-16, and the Franco-German Roland. Additional air defense was provided by Air Force interceptors and organic Army assets, including the SA-7/14, SA-8, SA-9/13, SA-16 missile systems, and the ZSU-23/4 self-propelled AAA system. In addition, the Iraqi air defense had more than 7,500 AAA pieces protecting all targets of value, some deployed on the roofs of numerous buildings in Baghdad housing government facilities. These weapons -- 57-mm and 37-mm AAA pieces, ZSU-23/4 and ZSU-57/2 self-propelled AAA systems, and hundreds of 14.5-mm and 23-mm light antiaircraft weapons -- formed the backbone of the integrated air defense network. In major high value target areas (such as Baghdad, airfields, chemical agent production complexes, and nuclear facilities) the combined arms air defense could prove lethal to aircraft operating below 10,000 feet.
there were many circumstances when Iran should have been invaded, the hostage crisis for example, why wasnt it?
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
Iran has been invaded many times in history. It was invaded during WW2 with ease by the allies. I highly doubt they were using much of their strength for Iran, either
Iran would be a pushover if we could engage in an operation where our Generals, Joint Chief's and Commander in Chief called the shots.