Some are still trying to push fake planes due to POOR understanding & observational skills., page 8

a reply to: 5StarOracle

Bought truth movement opinions?

How do airplanes land if they cannot fly close to the ground.

Or

Yeap, your right. The jet couldn't sustain flight so it nosed crashed into a building while clipping light poles.

Good argument! A plan couldn't crash because it was doing something that would make it crash. Typical truth movement logic!

And here are links proving the 9/11 jets could sustain flight to the crash site and the speeds would not cause the jets to disintegrate before crashing!

And what was stopping the jets from crashing again? Oh! they did crash!

www.metabunk.org...

www.internationalskeptics.com...
www.911myths.com...

www.aerospaceweb.org...

Title: Pentagon & Boeing 757 Ground Effect

One of the pilots summarized his experiences by stating, "This whole ground effect argument is ridiculous. People need to realize that crashing a plane into a building as massive as the Pentagon is remarkably easy and takes no skill at all. Landing one on a runway safely even under the best conditions? Now that's the hard part!" While he may have been exaggerating a bit for effect, he does raise a valid point that flying skillfully and safely is much more difficult than flying as recklessly as the terrorists did on September 11.
- answer by Jeff Scott, 21 May 2006

ByRon White
www.quotes.net...

He says, "Hey man, if one of the engines goes out, how far will the other one take us?" I look at him. "All the way to the scene of the crash! Which is pretty lucky, because that's where we're headed! I bet we beat the paramedics by a good half hour! We're haulin' ass!"

edit on 18-2-2017 by neutronflux because: Fixed this and that