Sean Hannity's message to the press: You've been exposed as fake

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: Annee
And to think, I used to watch Hannity. Actually, had a little crush on him.

I think I'm gonna hurl

The Problem with Sean is , His TRUTHFUL Reporting Hurts.............

I took 30 seconds and looked up.... "lies told by Hannity"......do some research and see the multitude of lies told by hannity

a reply to: introvert

Hefficide already corrected me, so no need.

However I will disagree with one thing because in this you do need some correcting, but only on this small part:

The commandments have nothing to do with the constitution.

The main reason the U.S has been considered a Christian nation is because true Christianity is based on Anarchy. Anarchy does not mean chaos, it simply means no masters or rulers. Anarchy's true meaning is the abolishment of slavery. Or to put it simply: not a slave. It is with moral rules called "The Golden Rule." But it is also known as Natural law.

It is via Natural Law that the ten commandments was born, the rule or law of one. This is the true meaning of anarchy, which mainstream media has demonized and lied about for decades. But when you search out i's true meaning, you discover that you were lied about on this word. It should make you angry as a sovereign individual.

So yes, the constitution is based via Natural Law, the Golden rule.

Here is Judge Napolitano's Mention on Natural law (Keep in mind, he is a Judge, and he knows the constitution / the law by heart.)




but aside from this tid bit, everything else I already stand corrected on. natural Law allows us to take responsibility for our own actions as sovereign individuals.










We the people= Anarchy= Community=Civilized=the Church=the Bride of Christ (So yes the constitution has everything to do with the ten commandments.)

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

So his hypocrisy is in my head then?

Because it seems to me that there are no good reasons for a person who is angry about fakery in media, not to go after his own fakeries, which he has a MASSIVE history of. If he is really against fakery in media, he would fess up to his part in it.

But rather than do that alongside his complaint about "the other side", he neglected to mention it. That was very dishonest, and therefore, has to be considered a nefarious act.

originally posted by: carewemust
SEAN HANNITY is probably seen as an "outsider" by the arrogant SOB's at CNN/MSNBC/ABC, etc.. Besides, those MSM outlets are so stupid, they still don't realize that THEY helped Donald Trump get elected! They'll probably laugh at Sean's message.

There's only one way to hurt Liberal Media outlets quickly. Shut off their revenue.

I like being an arrogant SOB.....Trump has taught us that....the only way you will be heard is to act like an A**hole, and insult people.....the formula for a winning president...

a reply to: liveandlearn

Changing things will be touchy. If he outs one, he has to oust all MSM.

Wiki leaks provided the proof that the objective journalists were in bed with the Hillary campaign.

But NBC rigged gas tanks to blow up on GMC pickup trucks when they couldn't get them to blow up in crash tests.
NBC still has news shows that people still watch.

Little will change.

a reply to: TrueBrit

You may be very right about hypocrisy, but the nefarious motives are what I was saying are in your head. There is nothing dishonest about not pointing out one's own hypocrisy. For instance, Am I to expect that since you call out Hannity for not admitting his own hypocrisy, that you have and will point out your own? Because anything less would be hypocritical, dishonest, and therefor nefarious.

a reply to: SoulSurfer

LOL...

There is NOTHING about the 10 Commandments that reflect natural law. They represent the opposite, property ownership, and they enshrine slavery!

a reply to: SoulSurfer

So yes the constitution has everything to do with the ten commandments.

The 1st amendment does not say anything about thou shall not lie. You are injecting your own interpretation on top of it.

Very dangerous.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: SoulSurfer

LOL...

There is NOTHING about the 10 Commandments that reflect natural law. They represent the opposite, property ownership, and they enshrine slavery!

The second paragraph of the United States Declaration of Independence starts as follows: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

a reply to: SoulSurfer

What's your point? The 10 Commandments don't bestow equality to all men. Property owners must not be envied, and that includes their women.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

I cannot think of a sphere in which I am hypocritical, precisely because it annoys me when others do it, and so I make a concerted effort to avoid doing it myself.

However, if I ever come up with something, or something comes up which shines that light on me, yes, I would bring it up, without a doubt. I expect an awful lot from myself in terms of conduct, and if there is one person I hate to be disappointed by, more than I hate being disappointed by anyone else, its me.

a reply to: TrueBrit

I cannot think of a sphere in which I am hypocritical, precisely because it annoys me when others do it, and so I make a concerted effort to avoid doing it myself.

However, if I ever come up with something, or something comes up which shines that light on me, yes, I would bring it up, without a doubt. I expect an awful lot from myself in terms of conduct, and if there is one person I hate to be disappointed by, more than I hate being disappointed by anyone else, its me.

That is very noble and I'll make sure to hold you to it, for your own sake.

a reply to: SoulSurfer

Hannity calling the press fake? Lol pot meeting kettle BIG time here.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Hannity calling the press fake? Lol pot meeting kettle BIG time here.

I get it, we all (with common sense) get it. But atleast some truth is coming out aye? (Just being optimistic. I know the whole of MSM is not to be trusted, but every now and then they still spew up some facts.)

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

I mean this absolutely LesMisanthrope when I say, please do.

Self policing is tiring as all hell.

a reply to: SoulSurfer

Calling the press fake is so dishonest its not even funny. Bias is inherent in all reporting. This is a fact. In fact, it's ALWAYS been a fact. Ben Franklin's newspaper was biased and that tradition continued through the turn of the last century (look up William Randolph Hearst for some fun reading) and it continues today. This has always been the case. Trump nor his surrogates like Hannity aren't shining any lights on any bias. They are outright dismissing ALL media as untruthful because of bias. No bias does NOT (necessarily) equal untrue. You have to actually READ the content to make that determination. This of course requires you to consume the content still. Not abandon it completely.

Dismissing all media as biased and untrue is literally textbook embracing ignorance. Saying things like "the msm is not to be trusted" is lazy thinking. A GOOD critical thinker who properly questions the narrative reads those sources and figures out what is true and what isn't.

a reply to: SoulSurfer

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Hannity calling someone else FAKE NEWS???
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The guy must not have a single mirror in his home.
Let's start a gofunme and help this poor guy out.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

There is bias and then there is outright lying. The MSM has been caught lying and reporting unsubstantiated stories many times in the past year because it sounded good to them.

Of course the storys about fires, floods, tornadoes, etc. are usually decent reporting (though many times over exaggerated). But the problem is that if lies and bias are always mixed into a broadcast, then its too much work to go fact check everything to find out what is true. I'm not going to watch any major network news again, just local news while muting any political coverage. That will let me know whats going on in town, for US and world news I'll do my own research since I would have too anyway if I watched their BS.

a reply to: bluesjr

There is something to be said for watching news that contains a bias.

If you go into it knowing that either stories being selected, or the content of the stories will show bias, you get to read between the lines, and protect yourself from the bias infection, while absorbing data. Canny observers can discern the intent behind a piece or a news day, the function, the unseen hand.

I recommend getting stuck in and actually utilising your intellect as your shield.

originally posted by: bluesjr
a reply to: Krazysh0t

There is bias and then there is outright lying. The MSM has been caught lying and reporting unsubstantiated stories many times in the past year because it sounded good to them.

Of course the storys about fires, floods, tornadoes, etc. are usually decent reporting (though many times over exaggerated). But the problem is that if lies and bias are always mixed into a broadcast, then its too much work to go fact check everything to find out what is true. I'm not going to watch any major network news again, just local news while muting any political coverage. That will let me know whats going on in town, for US and world news I'll do my own research since I would have too anyway if I watched their BS.

So what? You are STILL being intellectually lazy to write them off as completely dishonest even because of past dishonesty. Plus when you readily admit that it is too much work to fact check you are admitting to intellectual laziness and you CERTAINLY aren't denying any ignorance. More like embracing it.