Seismographs detect strange disturbance all across North America?

a reply to: loam

I am pretty sure our quake experts confirmed it is nothing more than a computer error.

Or are you guys talking about something new?

If they are real that's kind of freaky and would make me think Yellowstone is about to blow or we were about to have a massive apocalypse status 9.0 plus earthquake.

a reply to: loam


It could just be that a lot of fracking companies in certain areas are fracking at the same time. Around here, one mine blasted at twelve thirty, another was blasting at one thirty. A mine forty miles away blasted, but they were kind of erratic with their times. Those blasts are picked up by seizmographs. I am sure it is nothing to worry about but I would kind of like to know what it means so later on when I hear about stuff like this I can understand.

The guy who made the video has other videos that are a little weird, but that does not mean that what he is saying doesn't have some basis. Random anomalies are common, caused by many things. There is a pattern here that is somewhat interesting though. I am sure it is nothing to worry about, those areas can have mines and fracking operations going on in them. They can also be coming from thunder storms where lightning hits the ground but there wouldn't be lightning much in the northern sections much this time of year.

Nothing to lose any sleep over, I think I am going to bed now.

a reply to: GoShredAK

There's a new video update down near the end of the last page.

a reply to: rickymouse

I'm sure there's nothing to lose sleep over as well. But it is interesting.

a reply to: loam

I don't think it is a computer anomaly unless for some reason a filter program to filter out manmade events is malfunctioning.

a reply to: rickymouse
Then it should be on the front page and ATS can still be awesome.

originally posted by: Riffrafter
a reply to: loam

That is just bizarre.

Does anyone have any ideas as to what caused all these events all across the country at roughly the same time?

It's a little spooky...

A gravitational wave due to a shift in the relative motion of the stars, which was also responsible for the flare, like a brief squeezing of the earth or a shift in magma due to the impact of a gravity and/or electromagnetic event - altering the flux of the flow around the Earth's core..

just speculating. Which would make it a galactic weather event. That's the first thing that sprang to my mind as a possible explanation, and one which might also have a linkage to a flare from the sun due to some sort perturbation in it's own gravitational and electromagnetic flux.

like a galactic fart or burb with only minor disturbances.

a reply to: loam

The one he mentions in Wisconsin is the same one I mentioned in my prior post, here.

He even says he doesn't know what they are and just assumes that they are some sort of world wide event.

The error appears on many plots, but not all. China's graphs dropping out is no uncommon. I've seen that page with every graph but a few dropped out.

He mentions the 6.3 in Peru and if you look, you can actually see that quake propagate across the globe and it is indeed picked up on the other side of the world, although the signal has become attenuated by the time it reaches places like Russia. Closer stations show the quake quite clearly and, as I mentioned if you look closely, you can watch as the signal spreads out from it's epicenter and is picked up later and later the further away from the epicenter you go.

He even goes back to the graph in Wisconsin not remembering he started the video out mentioning that particular graph and calls the signal "a weird pulse."

More telemetry errors. The erratic timing and location of the signals in question are what tell you that they are not seismic in nature. Anything that is seismic in nature will show up within a close time frame across wide areas. These instruments are extremely sensitive, and depending on the settings will pick up a person walking a mile away from where the instrument is located.

Seismic events don't have signals that only show up on certain stations and not others. It just doesn't happen unless it is very small and localized; mining explosions for example.

This business of "weird pulses," is a moron (admittedly by the moron) not knowing at what he is looking.



Really surprised he didn't mention the plot in Zambia:


Look at how regularly spaced the 'pulses' are. This is indicative of an artificial source to the signals. Not sure what, perhaps some sort of machinery, but it is not a natural signal.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thank for the input.

Time to hit the Holiday sales folks. Buy up all of the remote controlled trucks, and extra batteries, and dynamite

I have it on good authority from our next POTUS, that these anomalies are due to the annual Graboid migration. And them babies are heading south for the winter!
Kevin and Reba taught me how to take care of them in their Hollywood documentary Tremmors

a reply to: loam

You're quite welcome.

One other thing to note, being generous there are 12 graphs on which the anomaly appears. There are 161 graphs on that page and this represents less than 10% of the total number of graphs on the page; including ones for which there is no data present.

This is hardly a world wide event as he is claiming in his video.

Not sure if it helped, but thems me thinks.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Now that is really useful to know!

a reply to: loami am sorry guys i made homemade burritos and they gave me gas.

Funny, but my friend called me from Sarasota, Florida, asking if anything had happened on that day. I asked why, and he said that his German Sheppard was howling and acting funny all that night. He said that his son who has 2'weaner dogs did the same thing, but they were 25 miles further north. I know that animals can sense different changes, but this is amazing.

Just checked the heliplots page, almost all of them are spiking big time, I think this is something big, and strange.

a reply to: anotherside

Just captured some of these:









There are dozens more, and they all look like these.

jadedANDcynical???

I saved all of the images from this link, but there are a boat load of them:

earthquake.usgs.gov...

ETA:

I've U2U'd jadedANDcynical. Let's see what he thinks again.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
One other thing to note, being generous there are 12 graphs on which the anomaly appears. There are 161 graphs on that page and this represents less than 10% of the total number of graphs on the page; including ones for which there is no data present.

This is hardly a world wide event as he is claiming in his video.

This time, nearly all of them look like that.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: anotherside

Just captured some of these:

Most likely these:


The rest seem like normal traces to me. I don't even see that many that have telemetry errors on them; perhaps 4 or 5. The Hockley, TX graph still looks wonky, I'm thinking that instrument is in need of maintenance. The graph for Zambia still shows that signal that I mentioned in my previous post as probably being mechanical due to its regularity.



All of the other US based stations are probably picking up on the on in Missouri. The other places are generally known seismic hotspots, Turkey for example.

Depending on the sensitivity settings of the graph, a minor earthquake can look like a huge shake up. Anything of significance will swamp a graph completely and cause it to max out, but I don't see that in any of the traces currently up.

what is the known status at CERN....

if the facility is busy bombarding heavy lead ions... there is evidence that the process is creating an amazing but destructive sub-atomic thing/entity/energy unit.... its called a Strangelet


RE:
Strangelet
A strangelet is a hypothetical particle consisting of a bound state of roughly equal numbers of up, down, and strange quarks. Its size would be a minimum of a few femtometers across (with the mass of a light nucleus). Once the size becomes macroscopic (on the order of metres across), such an object is usually called a quark star or "strange star" rather than a strangelet.
Strangelet - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org...



from what I have read on these sub-particles/Strangelets, they are more destructive than nuclear bombs,
Also, the sub-particles tend to settle down to the Core of the Earth...instead of flying out into space, for some reason


maybe an investigation in CERN experiments is needed...and a decision making body assembled to Stop the Risks to planet Earth... I entertain the notion that the CERN is covertly running dangerous experiments in trying to create a 'doorway' or 'portal' to another dimension...with no concern to the resonance of the Planet being sent into dangerous states like the energy spikes being amassed & recorded by some seismic stations world-wide

is this targeting the America hemisphere only ?