Latest update on the Clintonstein recount: time to pay up or shut up in Wisconsin

First, a little outro music for Krazysh0t...

Every day I wander
In negative disposition
As I'm bombarded by superlatives
Realizing very well that I am not alone
Introverted
I look to tomorrow for salvation
But I'm thinking altruistically
And a wave of overwhelming doubt
Turns me to stone

a reply to: jimmyx

the security agencies (NSA, CIA, etc.) of this country say the opposite...but obviously you believe nothing coming from them.

(cynically speaking)

You mean, they swayed the election by providing US citizens the truth about Hillary during a time when it was most important?

Thank You Russia.

If anything, it was a defensive maneuver considering her thirst for war and desire to escalate the conflict in Syria.

a reply to: Nyiah

Well then let's do it.

You pick a state of your choice where you think fraud most likely happened and recount it. We'll pick a state of our choice and count that.

a reply to: Voiceofthemajority

Please see the posts above yours.
Stein paid the fee. The Recount is on.

a reply to: Voiceofthemajority

Please see the posts above yours.
Stein paid the fee. The Recount is on.

THIS is interesting:

The Commission further directed staff to assess the full estimated recount fee to both petitioning candidates unless the candidates each submit payment for one-half of the total estimated cost by the close of business on Tuesday, November 29, 2016.

"BOTH petitioning candidates."
Apparently Clinton is involved just as much as Stein.

And it says that both candidates will pay half. I wonder if that means that Clinton is actually paying?
If so, then what happens to the rest of the Green Party donations?
Or, did Clinton already pay her share to the $7 million recount fund?

Correction:
elections.wi.gov...

The Wisconsin Elections Commission today received two recount petitions from the Jill Stein for President Campaign and from Rocky Roque De La Fuente, Administrator Michael Haas announced.

So, De La Fuente is paying for half?

Another interesting thing from the article posted above:

The last statewide recount was of the Supreme Court election in 2011. At that time, the Associated Press surveyed county clerks and reported that costs to the counties exceeded $520,000, though several counties did not respond to the AP’s survey. That election had 1.5 million votes, and Haas said the Commission expects the costs to be higher for an election with 2.975 million votes.

So, there were almost twice as many votes this year as compared to 4 years ago.
No wonder the results are different than expected!
If their estimates before the election were based on the usual votes in that state, and then more people than ever get out to vote this year, then of course the results are going to be different than expected.

elections.wi.gov...

Live stream of Wisconsin recount hearing:

www.channel3000.com...

This judge seems very biased and is allowing a fake expert to testify.

www.channel3000.com...

a reply to: Voiceofthemajority

Well I guess she will pay, after all, with all the publicity, she has not choice.

a reply to: BlueAjah

I would not worry, one state means nothing, Trump win will stay the same.

This is going to go into history as the biggest fiasco played by Hillary and her proxy Stein as obviously they will never be presidents of anything, what a way to go into history.

Hillary in my books will always be the biggest corrupted hag that there is, I am glad she will never be president.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

I think he is just following procedure in case it comes back and bite him in the butt in his possible political career in the future.

originally posted by: marg6043

a reply to: BlueAjah

I would not worry, one state means nothing, Trump win will stay the same.

This is going to go into history as the biggest fiasco played by Hillary and her proxy Stein as obviously they will never be presidents of anything, what a way to go into history.

Hillary in my books will always be the biggest corrupted hag that there is, I am glad she will never be president.

I bet they will run as a ticket in 2020.

Already rumors about that. lol.

Let them recount, I say, but it will be spun as a noble battle against voter fraud, perpetrated by dark forces against democracy.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Let them do it, nobody wanted them now and nobody is going to want them in 2020 either, that will give Trump another 4 years.

Why hasn't she demanded recounts of New Hampshire? Clinton only won by 2,736 votes. Recount! We must ensure the integrity of the system!

billypenn.com... Apparently the recount will only be in a small fraction of the districts in PA.

originally posted by: Teikiatsu
Why hasn't she demanded recounts of New Hampshire? Clinton only won by 2,736 votes. Recount! We must ensure the integrity of the system!

Trump camp should call for a CA and NY recount.

Just the counties he lost. Tit for tat.

a reply to: pteridine

There is no recount . Maybe on December 5th that will change, but as of now, and tomorrow, and every day up until December 5th there is no recount in Pennsylvania.

a reply to: Voiceofthemajority


The following ends any argument concerning the matter.


Jill will be enjoying all of those 7 million she took.

November 29, 2016 9:30pm EST

Updated Pennsylvania info as of tonight...

From: www.thepostemail.com...

""(Nov. 29, 2016) — A major Pennsylvania newspaper reported on Tuesday that the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has scheduled a hearing on a lawsuit filed by attorneys for Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein challenging the validity of the state’s election returns from November 8.

Fox News also reported the development Tuesday evening.

Citing news reports that the email accounts of DNC operatives and Hillary Clinton strategists were breached and made public and that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had warned in October that an outside entity might attempt to sabotage the upcoming U.S. elections, Stein’s filing includes an affidavit (Exhibit “A,” p. 7) from University of Michigan Computer Science professor J. Alex Halderman, who presented a scenario under which electronic voting equipment might be infected with “malware” by hypothetical “attackers.”"

This is another symptom of DESPERATE and DYSFUNCTIONAL DEMOCRATS???

In Wisconsin this evening, a judge ruled that the recount will NOT be by hand. A "by hand" recount was needed in order to find out if those Trump-loving Russians manipulated the electronic voting platform to steal votes from Hillary.

Article: www.mcclatchydc.com...

Didn't Jill Stein just write a check for $3.5 million today to the State of Wisconsin? haha.. SUCKER!!!