Prez-elect Donald J. Trump Says There Was SERIOUS VOTER FRAUD in VA NH and CA.

a reply to: links234

No, is just the fact that while you are right and Trump won, is people that wants to undermine the validity of his win.

Hell even I would do the same thing in the same circumstances.

originally posted by: buster2010
This idiot just doesn't know when to keep his trap shut does he? Let's see his evidence or is he just going to run his trap like usual.

His presidency will be everything BUT boring!

Yeah nightmares can be a blast.

Did you call out Jill Stein and Hillary before you called out Trump?
Is your problem that Trump is 3rd to the recount party or is it just that because Trumps a straight white man so needs to check his priviledge and give the ladies a chance?

As far as I know other than the result being close there is no need for a recount anywhere Trump won, they even claaimed one of the states Trump won had been electronically hacked when they exclusively use paper ballots!!!

So do Jill and Hill need to shut their traps as well or is it OK for them to make accusations without evidence cause, you know, theyre not Trump?

With all the claims from both sides of voter fraud, do ya think they will take this opportunity to tighten up the system before the next election?
You know they won't.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Thanks for posting that video, BlueAjah. I meant to watch it during the campaign. It's ironic that this video more relevant now, than it was in October.

a reply to: Bluntone22

They did after the hanging chads in Florida, but sadly it seems that each state is on their own when it comes to dealing with voting integrity.

It is exactly the type of response I expect from Donald.

My expectations of him have always been low.

originally posted by: fractal5
a reply to: carewemust

It was suspicious to me that the most Democrat-heavy zones like college town Keene, NH took the longest time to report their votes in New Hampshire. That was a state with a 0.2% lead for Clinton, so there should have been a re-count given the tiny margin there.

On a related note, if 2,000 libertarian Republicans would move to New Hampshire we can vote for the lesser evil next time! You are very welcome and the state is very libertarian with lots of people having voted for Ron Paul in some counties higher than anywhere in the nation.

Exactly, there were several democrat strongholds that held their vote totals long after they should have reported. It is likely they were held to see if they could passably commit election fraud to win the state for Hillary by determining the number of votes needed, if the lead for trump was to large the fraud was not attempted.

This is not just my opinion, but also Bev Harris's opinion as to what happened as well.

a reply to: buster2010

It is well established that illegals voted in previous elections.

That is beyond debate.

It is ludicrous to think illegals did not vote in this election as well.

Meanwhile, there is no evidence of Russian hacking whatsoever.

This could be Trump's way of leading into a plan to ask for a recount.

See, Stein's recount is all cover for Hillary's attempt to deny him the 270 via inaction of the courts and force the Republicans to elect him. By asking for a recount himself, he could also lower her electoral college votes through inaction of the courts to meet a deadline.

But, this is merely small ammo compared to a calculated hit by the DNC to further legitimatize Trump's nomination and create further instability.

Make no mistake folks, the Democrats are SCARED of Trump succeeding and will now further point the country using the media towards chaos. These are evil people running that party.

originally posted by: buster2010
This idiot just doesn't know when to keep his trap shut does he? Let's see his evidence or is he just going to run his trap like usual.

That's you ... always asking for evidence. Go demand it from Trump, why don't you?

Your new president is going to have it investigated after the inauguration. That's what Presidents do. LOL

a reply to: Tempter

I wonder also, what is the democratic party worry about that they can not let government change hands, its the present administration with soo many skeletons in the closet accumulated for the last 8 years that they can not stand having them uncovered by a new administration?

originally posted by: buster2010
This idiot just doesn't know when to keep his trap shut does he? Let's see his evidence or is he just going to run his trap like usual.

His presidency will be everything BUT boring!

Yeah nightmares can be a blast.

You mean like jill and hillary?

Lets see their evidence, how about that? And seeing as they already have 7 million in the bank for it all you would think they had the evidence good and ready to go right? Yet no court date from them for pensilvania. That does not exactly tell me that they have much to be honest.

They want 3 red states recounted where hillary lost, 1 of which never voted digitally (it was indeed hackers according to jill right?!"


Now trump wants 3 blue states recounted. One of which houses a huge number of illegals who were allowed to vote because they did not need any ID. That all by itself is reason enough. And i refer you to blueajah's post above yours.


But when this happens you get all salty and agressive.... i dont understand, werent you all for investigations to make sure these votes were all done honestly? What happened with that so suddenly ?

Jill and hillary can call for a recount but trump cannot and should keep his mouth shut...
"honest voting and investigations" right? But only for the ones you want that for, im sorry to admit it but you people are indeed as transparant as your party claims you are sometimes

originally posted by: Grimpachi
It is exactly the type of response I expect from Donald.

My expectations of him have always been low.

Is that what you said about jill and hillary as well?

I think were about at the stage where both sides are playing near petrol with matches by casting dispersions on the results

a reply to: carewemust

Funny he always says things as if they were true. Ironically enough, his voter fraud rhetoric during the general election leading up to Election Day actually caused his own supporters to commit and get arrested for voter fraud.

Irony over 9000!

a reply to: BlueAjah

So Trump crying fraud and asking for a recount is fine but Jill Stein doing the same thing is not okay?

That there is Trump supporter logic.

originally posted by: Darkmadness

originally posted by: Byrd
a reply to: carewemust

Eh, it's just his tit-for-tat noise ploy.

He's done this before when someone "displeases the Donald" - he hits back doing the same thing. If someone calls him a name, he goes back to name-calling (instead of more effective tactics.) He has a long record of countersueing people who are suing him.

He's really not capable of a nuanced response.

He's not very smart.

The real hoax here is challenging someone's intelligence with billions of dollars who just became president.

I would say it's more Batman'ish than anything.

Actually, we don't know that he has billions of dollars. Remember, he said he would release his tax forms - and then didn't. For all we know, the money he's gotten from the campaign is helping him out of bankruptcy.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
I hope Trump does ask for recounts.

I hope we spend the next 4 years recounting. Then the next 4 years can be as productive as the last 50.

a reply to: buster2010

This idiot just doesn't know when to keep his trap shut does he? Let's see his evidence or is he just going to run his trap like usual.

Does Stein or Hillary have any evidence of voters fraud in the states that they want recounts in?? If not, they as well need to stop throwing their temper tantrums like usual.

a reply to: marg6043

So would I,I live in So California,most people I run into were for Trump,but the socialist they have running the state wouldn't trust them,hope they overturn vote I'd love that