Trump Won Both Popular ( 62.9 M -62.2 M ) And Electoral College Votes ( 306-232)

originally posted by: Pyle

Half the nation lives in those blobs. Those are not some minority places.

Less than half of the U.S. population live in those "blue blobs". Not to mention that places like south Florida voted for Trump. The majority latino vote in south Florida voted for Trump. Places like Michigan, places that have been democrat for years voted for Trump.

...
Michigan

Trump has a slim lead in Michigan. As of November 11, the Secretary of State in Michigan was reporting the following totals:

Trump: 2,277,914
Clinton: 2,264,807
Johnson: 172,726
Stein: 51,420
Castle: 16,125
Soltysik: 2,231
...

link

www.detroitnews.com...

Are you telling us those are states where only a minority of Americans live in?...

I remember trump winning the popular vote on election day, I was watching the numbers all day and he was ahead in everything, including the popular vote. I just searched "election results" or something like that and Google had it's own custom display for the data. Then the next day the MSM was widely reporting Hillary won the popular vote, which I found strange considering I didn't see any data indicating she had won it. I was almost going to start a thread and ask if anyone else remembered Trump winning the popular vote.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

I was also following the results, and flipping channels to see what other news sources were reporting and concur with your assessment.

IMO the globalists, and their puppets in the media are still trying to rig the election, or bring more chaos in the U.S. We know Soros and the DNC are behind these riots.

BTW, we still have to count absentee ballots, and historically absentee ballots go 67-33% Republican. The majority of those votes are military, students studying abroad, and business people abroad, but mostly it is the military who vote absentee and military personnel mostly vote Republican, despite the left trying to turn our military into "precious snowflakes".

It was Bernstein now it's Bernstain, It was Oxyclean now it's Oxiclean. It was "Hello, Clarice" not "Good evening, Clarice".

I'm chalking all this crap up, including the popular vote to the Mandella Effect. Yup, that's the only explaination why everyone thinks Trump won it.

Someone changed the timeline guys, I mean it was Loony Tunes, now it's Loony Toons.

And Hillary, somehow won the popular vote.

a reply to: Kettu

No, it's because this is what Hillary rallies looked like...

Hillary's fan turn out at her rally in MLK Plaza (Toledo)



Hillary's fan turn out in Iowa high school. (notice the empty seats to the left, she couldn't even fill a high school)



Hillary's fan turn out in Omaha. (a grand total of 50 people meanwhile a reporter at the Washington Post claimed “Big boisterous crowd here in Omaha for Hillary Clinton and Warren Buffet,”)



Hillary's fan turn out at a National Baptist Convention rally.






Hillary's fan turn out to the American Legion.



In every case the mainstream media had to turn to camera tricks to make it look like she had more supporters when this is not true. But somehow she got the popular vote?...

PHOTO ESSAY: Trump vs Hillary Crowd Comparison – Pictures Say a Thousand Words!

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

Final #Election2016 numbers

#PopularVote: #Trump: 62,972,226 #Clinton: 62,277,750

#ElectoralCollege vote #Trump 306 #Clinton 232

Update: Anyone asking where I got the figures, it was from twitter posts. Knowing the Democrat media have been dragging their liberal feet giving Michigan to Trump – finally they did, with Arizona finally declared two days ago – Trump now has the 309. Except for the twitter posts, the popular vote number still need to be updated in Wikipedia or MSM media – which may take another few days because the liberals are still reeling and recovering from Trump-shock victory. If I’m wrong, I won’t hesitate to change the numbers. It’s the job of the establishment media to tell the people the final numbers when it’s out there already.

As of 11/13/16, CNN and Wikipedia are showing different numbers.

Example below: As of 11/13/16 CNN and Wikipedia quote same electoral vote number for Hillary Clinton but not with Trump – CNN still using the 290, Wikipedia 306 EV. They also differ when it comes to popular votes – CNN has more for Clinton, Wikipedia has less.

Remember, CNN projected a Trump popular vote victory when all ballots are counted. Then CNN claim “design flaw” for the projection.
...

Link

We know that the mainstream media has been caught lying, time and again. Recently we have also seen how reports by mainstream media have been debunked by social media and not just in the U.S. As an example what happened in Germany during New Years Eve was being hidden by authorities and the media until people in social media reported differently. It was later found that the authorities and media were hiding the truth and the statements made by people in social media were in fact the truth. In the U.S. similar events have occurred which authorities and the mainstream media have tried to hide, and through social media and only after people started reporting the opposite was the truth found.

These posts in twitter include statements made by Judge Jeanine Pirro. We also do know that the mainstream media has been very slow in reporting the results. During the election results i kept switching through different channels to find that CNN was one of the slowest news media channels to update their numbers. Taking them hours to update their numbers when other news channels already had the numbers updated.

We know that Soros, and his "brainless zombies" are part of the globalist agenda to try to destabilize the U.S. from within, so it is no wonder that the mainstream media would be slow in reporting that it seems that Trump also got the popular vote, despite the election fraud and other dirty tactics done by the DNC as the wikileaks show.

As of note, CNN itself at first was reporting that Trump would win the popular vote, now they are saying "it was a flaw". Yet, CNN, and Wikipedia, among others is still showing Trump winning 290 electoral votes and Clinton having 232. When other websites have already reported two days ago that Trump won 306 electoral college votes.

I am guessing the left wing media is waiting to see what happens with the protests to see if they can "switch the results and get Hillary into office by using yet more dirty tactics", and we will only see the final count weeks down the road.

We shall see what happens and see whether it is true and Trump won also the popular vote...

So let me make sure I'm reading this correctly. The majority of Americans selected Trump as their President by over 1/2 million votes. Trump won the Electoral votes by an amazing landslide beating Clinton by a little more than 130%.

So since the "protesters" are still protesting (eg. vandalizing, threatening, destroying, etc.) what they are protesting is not getting their way...PERIOD. I mean...if Trump won in every way possible, what else CAN they be protesting.

What a bunch of babies. I worry about the future of America with such a pathetic group of young adults that can't even accept that they won't always get their way. They are going to have a real tough time in the real world. I guess they can thank their liberal parents for destroying their future.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Because the size of the rally is a measure of the fitness of a candidate?

a reply to: DJW001

Germany thought Hitler was the greatest so he was "fit" to them.

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: DJW001

You still lose, Hillary doesnt win. Suck it up the fat lady has sung...no not Hillary

What is really interesting, there are a boatload of us independents, who aren't and weren't Hillary supporters, that are laughing our asses off at the ignorance of the right.

And I know 6 different democrat registered voters who all voted Trump and some who plan on switching parties to independents in the future. Do try to spin everything for your little one-liner jab that only makes you look desperate to agree with a bunch of idiots that still think Hillary looks good. It's exactly why those 6 democrats I know voted Trump cause you candidate were all dirty and made fools of themselves going over the top with every Trump attack, so in hindsight there's some pretty stupid people out there who are still obviously programmed by the local evening news.

originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
I remember trump winning the popular vote on election day, I was watching the numbers all day and he was ahead in everything, including the popular vote. I just searched "election results" or something like that and Google had it's own custom display for the data. Then the next day the MSM was widely reporting Hillary won the popular vote, which I found strange considering I didn't see any data indicating she had won it. I was almost going to start a thread and ask if anyone else remembered Trump winning the popular vote.

The West Coast returns come pretty late in the evening... California turned the popular vote on its head. I am a little miffed that the MSM is still not reporting final results, and if the final results do show Trump winning the popular vote, the MSM is compicit in any of the rioting and criminal activity currently happening.

a reply to: DJW001

No, the size of all rallies is a true measure of who voters want, and not the lies from the mainstream media. Trump rallies were always full, even those rallies done outdoors. HIllary's were not full and the mainstream media was caught time and again using camera tricks, such as getting closer to the few people going to her rallies and make it look like her rallies were full when they were not. Not to mention that Hillary's rallies had to be done indoors, and even then most of her rallies were not full. How is it possible that a candidate that couldn't fill her rallies could have won the popular vote?.... It's simply not possible, and wikileaks showed us what the DNC actually did to rig the polls and the election.

BTW, your photo of Germany's Nazism doesn't corroborate your claims, more so because Hitler and the Nazis were left wingers.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

How is it possible that a candidate that couldn't fill her rallies could have won the popular vote?

Because employed middle aged people don't have the time to stand in line to be herded into a big room to have their opinions affirmed en mass. Especially when the media keeps assuring them that their candidate is certain to win on election day. As for the Nazis being left wing, their open border policy, tolerance of homosexuality, and affirmative action for minorities is what proves it, right?

a reply to: onthedownlow

the MSM is compicit in any of the rioting and criminal activity currently happening.

Why? Do you think Anarchists get their news from the mainstream media?

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Can you explain why FOX News is also saying Hillary is ahead in the popular vote?

The link was posted on page one and clearly ignored by you, why?

How about my link? Ignored too because it doesn't fit your rhetoric...

Trump has won, even with Hillary getting the popular vote, Trump got it, the system works.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: onthedownlow

the MSM is compicit in any of the rioting and criminal activity currently happening.

Why? Do you think Anarchists get their news from the mainstream media?

If they followed Clinton, then a big resounding YES. Oh but we're talking about the rioter Clinton camp anarchists. What's real sad is Hillary never cared for them, and she hates them all for the necessity of needing them in the first place. That's how she rolls. Proven when she failed to speak to any of them after losing. Until the next day that is. And if you can't see by how the media is feeding these rioters by their chosen narrative, then get some help.
“The Real Clinton Conspiracy” Which Backfired Dramatically

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

If they followed Clinton, then a big resounding YES.

Do those mugshots look like white suburban women or college educated white collar men? They are not Clinton supporters, they're Anarchists, and the Tea Party should be applauding their strong stand against government.

Hahaha, this is funny.

It went from Trump supporters saying a few hundred thousand votes in a country of 300+ million was not a big deal, to Hillary supporters now saying a few hundred thousand votes in a country of 300+ million is not a big deal.

So which is it?

a reply to: DJW001

Because the size of the rally is a measure of the fitness of a candidate?

if you ever look at real photos of hitler rally's, most of the attendees were troops. and those that aren't you in the majority of them you see some troops in the mix. Germans knew the deal after a time. if you voiced opposition, you usually wound up on a train or just disappeared. the German people didn't have much choice.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Ummm, a bit premature considering we won't have all the numbers until December.