It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: goou111
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: goou111
a reply to: goou111
There I edited out the Pregnant part of the title even though none of you can prove she was not pregnant.
But she was attacked with a baseball bat.
She, personally was not. That would make a reasonable person believe, from the title, that a bat struck her body.
Prove she is not pregnant? That is ridiculous. That would cause people to add (maybe pregnant) to any story about a female ever.
Everywhere I am seeing this it says pregnant woman trying to get to an emergency. I did not make that up.
But keep defending these jackasses that cant accept their future with Trump.
I am not defending them. Still, your title brings to mind someone who is being beaten with a bat. Someone who is sustaining bodily injury.
Why on earth is finding a title to be wrong based on the footage it matches defending anyone?
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: goou111
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: goou111
No he wouldn't.
They would be charged with vandalism related offences, disturbance of the peace, and other public order offences. There was no offence against the person involved. Nice try, but no cigar.
If he would have hit her with the bat then it would have been assault and battery . But just threatening her with the bat much less swinging it at her car is a felony.
Hitting her with the bat would probably be felony assault. The swinging it at the car or hitting the car are various misdemeanors, depending on what police want to arrest him for and what a prosecutor wants to charge him with.
Who are you trying to convince? Yourself?
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: dragonridr
I am not condoning anything. Nothing I have stated condoned or defended anything. It is not deflection, either.
The original title did not match the facts at all. The OP is still completely incorrect. That is all I have been posting.
People reading 'pregnant woman beaten with bat trying to get to the hospital' are being badly misled.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: dragonridr
I am not condoning anything. Nothing I have stated condoned or defended anything. It is not deflection, either.
The original title did not match the facts at all. The OP is still completely incorrect. That is all I have been posting.
People reading 'pregnant woman beaten with bat trying to get to the hospital' are being badly misled. It plays on emotions and is dishonest.
Should all threads start looking like BIN or GLP here?
originally posted by: liammc
Who are you trying to convince? Yourself?
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: dragonridr
I am not condoning anything. Nothing I have stated condoned or defended anything. It is not deflection, either.
The original title did not match the facts at all. The OP is still completely incorrect. That is all I have been posting.
People reading 'pregnant woman beaten with bat trying to get to the hospital' are being badly misled.
originally posted by: goou111
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: dragonridr
I am not condoning anything. Nothing I have stated condoned or defended anything. It is not deflection, either.
The original title did not match the facts at all. The OP is still completely incorrect. That is all I have been posting.
People reading 'pregnant woman beaten with bat trying to get to the hospital' are being badly misled. It plays on emotions and is dishonest.
Should all threads start looking like BIN or GLP here?
What you are doing is showing how ignorant of the law you are
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: slider1982
where the hell are the Police!!!!....
The bottom line should give you a hint where the police are .
Oh my god.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: liammc
Who are you trying to convince? Yourself?
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: dragonridr
I am not condoning anything. Nothing I have stated condoned or defended anything. It is not deflection, either.
The original title did not match the facts at all. The OP is still completely incorrect. That is all I have been posting.
People reading 'pregnant woman beaten with bat trying to get to the hospital' are being badly misled.
No, I was replying to a post, as one does on a discussion board.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: slider1982
where the hell are the Police!!!!....
The bottom line should give you a hint where the police are .
Mr Hales should be arrested.
originally posted by: AlienView
Donald Trump received votes that the liberals took for granted:
"Liberal Muslim Woman Says She Voted For Donald Trump In Order To Shut Down ‘Liberal Honor Brigade’"
"whactya4 hours ago: "Oh my goodness" And she couldn't even fake looking surprised by the feed cut-off? LOL! So CNN thought they had their "gotcha" moment on the liberal Muslim journalist but cut her off when they realized she had a reasonable point of view that didn't fit their narrative. CNN is the most dishonest news network operation today".
originally posted by: goou111
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: dragonridr
I am not condoning anything. Nothing I have stated condoned or defended anything. It is not deflection, either.
The original title did not match the facts at all. The OP is still completely incorrect. That is all I have been posting.
People reading 'pregnant woman beaten with bat trying to get to the hospital' are being badly misled. It plays on emotions and is dishonest.
Should all threads start looking like BIN or GLP here?
What you are doing is showing how ignorant of the law you are
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
Rioting in the streets is a crime.
It shoukd be punsishe dtonthe fullest extent.
It is a hazard to drivers and rioters alike.
Anyboy who is in the street when someone commits violence is an accomplice and just as guilty of assault.
No. If one person in a street commits violence all of the other people int he street, maybe 1,000, are not accomplices.
That is absurd.