It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTF Chelsea being groomed to run for congress

page: 2
17
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   
Let's be fair, is anyone exactly surprised by this? The thing I find funny is that the Post is trying to make it sound like a terrible thing that she's running against a politician that has been in office for 30 years. The exact same kind of politician Trump is supposed to be against. Drain the swamp, right?



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   
she may not ever get elected, look at Jeb Bush he was suppose to carry on the bush dynasty but the people have rejected him more than once.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:27 PM
link   
I know we can expect all of her dirt will be coming out soon enough.

They need to stop this before it's too late.

But I think her own big mouth will be what stops her.




posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:30 PM
link   
Didn't Chelsea receive classified information from Mom?
I thought that was a felony.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:31 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Indeed, though they had the help of a standing army under his personal direction, and there were riots in the streets, and assassinations...
Whereas the Medici had to make do with gaining control of the party, excluding outsiders from the party as enemies of the state, getting members of their family elected Pope...
Hmm. Either way looks good.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: DISRAELI

Good stuff, Medieval history fascinates me, particularly the Medici, Picolomini and Borgias.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Didn't Chelsea receive classified information from Mom?
I thought that was a felony.


She sure did.

But the Clintons won't take the Hillary loss "lying" down will they.




posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

yes, mommy sent it to her from the illegal server in her bathroom lol



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
When I was doing my History course, my "Foreign History" selection was the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Even though the tutor was a French history specialist, and therefore obsessed, I managed to get in a couple of essays on the Italian cities.
If people think the Electoral College is complicated, the ballot-drawing system and tricks of Florence would blow their minds.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 02:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Didn't Chelsea receive classified information from Mom?
I thought that was a felony.

Yeah, but everyone is supposed to forget that now.... because her mother lost an election.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Reports coming in that The IRS has been Sued for Clinton Foundation Documents...this should be good.

Wouldn't be holding out hope for that except Trump won I imagine
the IRS having a different boss will bring different results.

Time to find out how Chelsea paid for her wedding and her life
for 10 years! Uh oh.....



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:08 PM
link   
This was no surprise. The Clinton era is now dead and their influence all but powerless.
However, if the Clintons are to be seen again, it'll be there daughter, Chelsie.
I am going to give her the benefit of the doubt. Maybe she might "refine" and do things differently from her parents. The experience and knowledge is there.
Btw, I wouldn't put it pasr us that the Clintons influence is all but gone, I am sure they got enough dirt to command something, if nothing else.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   
The DNC really like to beat dead horses.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:30 PM
link   
I'm not going to hold the sins of the parents over Chelsea's head. It's not her fault she was spawned from scum. Give her a fair shot and maybe she'll do some good.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: AlaskanDad




edit on 11-11-2016 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)

edit on 11-11-2016 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

Even though the bush family made there fortunes off war profiteering.

Started one one of the biggest foreign policys blunders since Vietnam in Iraq

And pretty much let the financial markets crash in 2008.

Are we really talking the same bush family here?



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: marg6043
The taste of power is too powerful to be forgotten once they leave the white house.
Perhaps Michelle wants to give a try to become the first African American woman to become president.



LOL!! I think its time for *plan B*

My theory 'was' this time it was for the *first woman* Hillary

2024 was for *first black/woman* Michelle Obama

2032 Bring on Chelsea

2040 Malia Obama who is apparently down for Harvard

Thats the first half of the 21st century taken care of


But as they say....


*The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry*



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:41 PM
link   
a reply to: AlaskanDad

Well I for one am astonished, just absolutely astonished...





That anyone would be surprised by this.

Of Course They Are. If we still have a continuous system of government in 100 years there will still be Clintons in it; for better or worse.



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:46 PM
link   
As citizens of the US of A, we need to decide if we truly want to have ruling families aka dynasties. I myself feel these families breed more corruption into politics and are a good part of the reason the corruption does not end.

The Clintons have a history of running in the grey areas of the law and we know that hilley has stepped over that line with her handling of classified material, but not convictions.

How long before Chelsea is another elected official selling her favors to the 1% and foreign nations?



posted on Nov, 11 2016 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: AlaskanDad

On the one hand I agree with you, ruling families accumulate power and wealth over generations and that can be very bad for the public that they "serve".

On the other hand, it's also kind of inevitable. The public is often comforted by that continuity even if the ruling family in question has a bad track record. Also, within the elite, families like that have not only power but a certain credibility (real or imagined) but there none-the-less.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join