---Hard To Watch---High School Girl Viciously Attacked For Supporting Donald Trump

a reply to: alphabetaone

It was still provoked. How is it not provocation?

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: alphabetaone

It was still provoked. How is it not provocation?

Because the definition of provoke is:

deliberately make (someone) annoyed or angry.
"Rachel refused to be provoked"

And it was not deliberate or intentional...hence not provocation.

a reply to: alphabetaone

Slothy_Loppy made the attacker angry.

Jade unknowingly sided with Slothy_Loppy, who was the provocateur, not Jade.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: alphabetaone

Slothy_Loppy made the attacker angry.

Jade unknowingly sided with Slothy_Loppy, who was the provocateur, not Jade.

Ok well, while you should feel free to carry on with this charade, as far as I'm concerned, all questions have now been answered and I will recuse myself from this thread as the facts have become crystal clear to me.

a reply to: alphabetaone

What charade?

You tried to make an argument based on semantics even though I used the terms correctly. I never said Jade provoked anything. You saw what you wanted.

a reply to: daskakik

Is Slothy_Loppy who got beat on?

a reply to: daskakik

Yes, and the attacker asked if that was true. She was told it wasn't and she attacked anyway. The victim didn't provoke anyone.

a reply to: daskakik

your reason until this came up was she said something or wrote she shouldn't have, now it's she agreed with something.

but that reason doesn't apply she didn't do what you said at first, second it was the fault of the others for being to ignorant to check the post or accept the answer given.

as said before he could have typed both of those two word posts quicker than her nine word post, and hers appeared to be a agreement. not her fault. she was asked and the answer given was not accepted by the black girl or the others.

originally posted by: raymundoko
Is Slothy_Loppy who got beat on?

Of course not.

a reply to: raymundoko

Never said she did

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
your reason until this came up was she said something or wrote she shouldn't have, now it's she agreed with something.

Actually, it was that we didn't have all the info.

but that reason doesn't apply she didn't do what you said at first, second it was the fault of the others for being to ignorant to check the post or accept the answer given.

I never said she did anything. I said it looked that way.

as said before he could have typed both of those two word posts quicker than her nine word post, and hers appeared to be a agreement. not her fault. she was asked and the answer given was not accepted by the black girl or the others.

True but that still doesn't support the claim in the OP that she was attacked "just" for supporting Trump.