It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Nothin
No way the Democrat Voters let a Clinton screw them again.
They know the truth now.
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Nothin
No way the Democrat Voters let a Clinton screw them again.
They know the truth now.
What truth is that?
originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: Nothin
Nah.
If I can see a silver lining in a Trump presidency it's that he make a complete mockery of the two-party system. I really hope he does some amazing things. Honestly, I do. Because, if he does, the nation will see that it can stray from the will of Democrats and Republicans and still survive.
I think we might have a third-party viability scenario next election. Maybe even Dr. Stein. Who knows? But I'm pretty darned sure we won't ever elect another "typical" Democrat or Republican.
originally posted by: dreamingawake
I know you're trying to be hopeful and all for female president, but another Clinton, really? No, these are not the right people to represent, well, anyone.
No more Clintons. No more Bushs.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: Nothin
Kinda begs the question: why do people vote for a pretty face, to be their political leader? Where is the sense in that?
one could pass it off as shallow, but not necessarily.
sometimes a pretty face means self confidence. self confidence is a very important aspect in any type of leadership roles, especially on the political landscape. that wont change a need for a very sharp mind of course. If you have both, you are a unstoppable force. Beauty is a form of (natural) charisma..or at least heavily influences charisma..a politician needs a lot of charisma, not just with voters, but with other politicians to work together.
originally posted by: dreamingawake
a reply to: Nothin
Maybe Jill Stein if she decides to run then(at least one of the few I'd not mind too much).
There's more to politicians than the Clinton and Bush family's. By 202 their should be more female contenders to look forward to.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Bluntone22
How about you find someone that will make a "good" first female president.
Elizabeth Warren -- aside from the Faux-cohontas thing.
She would be a fine candidate.
So would condoleezza rice.
We have many fine women that are more than just a last name.
C. Rice? Really?
Status-quo. Part of the problem, cannot be part of the solution.
You just can't to see a black woman be successful.
You are clearly a racist, misogynist.
originally posted by: Gumerk
a reply to: Nothin
Huh?
Read up about her a little bit. I offered some detailed links to info about her in the post just above yours. She left the DNC her reputation with them be damned to do the right thing. She's an Iraq war veteran and is not a war hawk at all.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Nothin
But please permit a doubt, that the World truly wants what Trump will bring to the office of POTUS.
This is about America and NOT the WORLD.
Maybe that is why you don't seem to understand.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Nothin
No way the Democrat Voters let a Clinton screw them again.
They know the truth now.
What truth is that?
About how they screwed Bernie?
About how their party manipulates them?
About Clinton Foundation corruption?
About what the Clinton's really say about them behind closed doors?
How much truth can you handle???
originally posted by: dreamingawake
a reply to: Nothin
Maybe Jill Stein if she decides to run then(at least one of the few I'd not mind too much).
There's more to politicians than the Clinton and Bush family's. By 202 their should be more female contenders to look forward to.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: dreamingawake
a reply to: Nothin
Maybe Jill Stein if she decides to run then(at least one of the few I'd not mind too much).
There's more to politicians than the Clinton and Bush family's. By 202 their should be more female contenders to look forward to.
Nope, none of that
time for new blood, new ideas, a firm hand on science and innovation, of fair trade laws, a drop of identity politics in exchange for a focus on wealth disparity and creating ladders for poor regardless of gender or color.
Of fiscal responsibility mixed with projects that help the infrastructure so all the roadwork to success is there for us.
We don't need empires, we need new ideas.
And McCain's daughter seems a good fit.
originally posted by: Unity_99
Spirit gate and the dark side of the satanic murders connected to that evil family and the fact that she is married to Soros's family, REALLY PROHIBITS ANYONE WITH A BRAIN VOTING FOR HER.
originally posted by: Nothin
How does McCain's daughter, equal new blood?
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: Nothin
How does McCain's daughter, equal new blood?
Not a politician, a dad that is a moderate center right senator that overall is known to work with both sides, and doesn't seem to have any ties to any major corporate entities (outside of a columnist for Fox) and holds both liberal and conservative views in a pretty practical everyday person kind of onset..
also isn't afraid to go against not just the party politics of the right, but even her own father.
She is the middleman that may make both sides start reworking together.
Check her out, its a interesting prospect that may be what the country needs to be honest.
Meghan