It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: xuenchen
Melania under watchful eyes:
politicususa.com
originally posted by: goou111
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: xuenchen
Didn't Trump's son take a voting selfie in a state where it is illegal? Just sayin.
Also, Trump looked over Melania's shoulder while she voted. A NO-NO .
so just
Where did Trump look at his wifes vote? Oh wait you just believe it because you saw a picture.
abcnews.go.com...
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Cygnis
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: xuenchen
Didn't Trump's son take a voting selfie in a state where it is illegal? Just sayin.
Also, Trump looked over Melania's shoulder while she voted. A NO-NO .
so just
photoshops and derogatory innuendo
NO, true.
Ahh Reldra, I know everyone needs to believe in something, but eventually we all must see the light.
What will it take to get you to stop bashing only the right?
Don't you see BOTH sides are equally as bad?
For every negative thread about the Left, you have to point to the right. Is this your way of keeping your head in the sand?
It really is unbecoming of an intelligent person to ignore 1/2 of an issue, and only focus on one side.
I am a liberal. What do you expect me to bash? However, looking at my posts, I often compliment right wing people on their posts.
Unbecoming? I have a set of ideals. My head is not in the sand, that is insulting.
Just because I don;t follow the "both are crap" train doesn't make me unintelligent. I have my own mind.
originally posted by: Cygnis
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: xuenchen
Didn't Trump's son take a voting selfie in a state where it is illegal? Just sayin.
Also, Trump looked over Melania's shoulder while she voted. A NO-NO .
so just
photoshops and derogatory innuendo
NO, true.
Ahh Reldra, I know everyone needs to believe in something, but eventually we all must see the light.
What will it take to get you to stop bashing only the right?
Don't you see BOTH sides are equally as bad?
originally posted by: goou111
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: xuenchen
Didn't Trump's son take a voting selfie in a state where it is illegal? Just sayin.
Also, Trump looked over Melania's shoulder while she voted. A NO-NO .
so just
Where did Trump look at his wifes vote? Oh wait you just believe it because you saw a picture.
abcnews.go.com...
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: xuenchen
Didn't Trump's son take a voting selfie in a state where it is illegal? Just sayin.
Also, Trump looked over Melania's shoulder while she voted. A NO-NO .
so just
Tu quoque (/tuːˈkwoʊkwiː/;[1] Latin for, "you also") or the appeal to hypocrisy is an informal logical fallacy that intends to discredit the validity of the opponent's logical argument by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with its conclusion(s).
Tu quoque "argument" follows the pattern: Person A makes claim X. Person B asserts that A's actions or past claims are inconsistent with the truth of claim X. Therefore X is false.[2]
An example would be Peter: "Based on the arguments I have presented, it is evident that it is morally wrong to use animals for food or clothing." Bill: "But you are wearing a leather jacket and you have a roast beef sandwich in your hand! How can you say that using animals for food and clothing is wrong!"."[2]
It is a fallacy because the moral character or past actions of the opponent are generally irrelevant to the logic of the argument.[3] It is often used as a red herring tactic and is a special case of the ad hominem fallacy, which is a category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of facts about the person presenting or supporting the claim or argument.[4]
"The pot calling the kettle black" is a proverbial idiom that seems to have been of Spanish origin, versions of which began to appear in English in the first half of the 17th century. It is glossed in the original sources as being used of a person who is guilty of the very thing of which they accuse another and is thus an example of Psychological projection.
"Oho!" said the pot to the kettle;
"You are dirty and ugly and black!
Sure no one would think you were metal,
Except when you're given a crack."
"Not so! not so!" kettle said to the pot;
"'Tis your own dirty image you see;
For I am so clean – without blemish or blot –
That your blackness is mirrored in me."[8]
In ancient Greece, mention of 'the Snake and the Crab' signified much the same, where the critic censures its own behaviour in another. The first instance of this is in a drinking song (skolion) dating from the late 6th or early 5th century BCE.[9] The fable ascribed to Aesop concerns a mother crab and its young, where the mother tells the child to walk straight and is asked in return to demonstrate how that is done.[10]
The same theme differently expressed occurs in the Aramaic version of the story of Ahiqar, dating from about 500 BCE. 'The bramble sent to the pomegranate tree saying, "Wherefore the multitude of thy thorns to him that toucheth thy fruit?" The pomegranate tree answered and said to the bramble, "Thou art all thorns to him that toucheth thee".[11]
In Matthew 7:3-5, it is criticism of a less significant failing by those who are worse that is the target of the Sermon on the Mount: "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"