Yes, Donald Trump, the FBI Can Vet 650,000 Emails in Eight Days

a reply to: lSkrewloosel

they obviously did not or she would be locked up. thats the £500,000 that the FBI wife was paid to keep quiet. wether ti can or not be done is different. it just was not done.

comey obviously brought it attention to clear the air so it cant be brought up again.

This is a mess in all the dirt that has been left by the usually super cleaners. Whom ever did the cleaning for the Clintons on this latest scandal did a pi$$ poor job. I wouldn't be surprised if the person/persons responsible for the clean up wake up with a horse head in their bed, if you do a job for any of these politicians, better do it correct.

What happens if Hillary Clinton wins the US Presidential Election Do You accept the result?
Me: Hell no I will not accept a blatant criminal to be the president of the United States. As far as I'm concerned if she's President, I'm no longer a citizen.

a reply to: MysteryTime1970

your tube vid doesn't work. you need to paste the highlighted portion into the box that comes up after you hit the you tube button.
youtu.be...-zV2GdctaKU you only need the stuff after the last forward slash in the URL , looks like the bold example.

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
The fact he didn't know there is technology to read them, software that was written in a few days, shows how sublimely stupid and ignorant the man is.

No, technology does not read anything, people do. Software written in a few days? And you call Trump stupid and ignorant?

a reply to: seasonal

Here is the thread we already had this discussion over in fair detail right before you re-posted a new version:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I'm disappointed the mods didn't catch this purposeful action and take corrective action, but I'll just go ahead and post this link on each new page. I don't KNOW you did this just for personal attention, but none the less I'll post the links. Its annoying.

a reply to: fractal5

I'm disappointed the mods didn't catch this purposeful action and take corrective action, but I'll just go ahead and post this link on each new page. I don't KNOW you did this just for personal attention, but none the less I'll post the links. Its annoying

This was posted in a different forum, I did do a search and I think the fact that Trump was questioning the FBI's actions was a different approach to the story. Also these were posted 6-7 hours apart.

While I do all I can to try to bring fresh info to the forums, I can't guarantee this won't happen again.
I hope you understand and we can still read my threads and get involved.

Thanks for taking the time to point this out.

Seasonal

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Where they searching for child porn, or were they searching for corruption. Corruption would have to be hand read. Big spools of yarn. If they were about shutting down corruption they would have already. We've already done half the work for them. I call straw man (we needed a yarn man).

And I call bull crap steaming stinky cow pie man.

Get your act together.
It's no different than a computer algorithm scanning applications for a job ---- they look for keywords.
None found? Move along, folks. NOTHING TO SEE HERE.

originally posted by: MysteryTime1970
What happens if Hillary Clinton wins the US Presidential Election Do You accept the result?
Me: Hell no I will not accept a blatant criminal to be the president of the United States. As far as I'm concerned if she's President, I'm no longer a citizen.

See ya. Don't forget to pack clean underwear.

a reply to: fractal5

I'm disappointed the mods didn't catch this purposeful action and take corrective action, but I'll just go ahead and post this link on each new page. I don't KNOW you did this just for personal attention, but none the less I'll post the links. Its annoying.

THere is nothing "catchable" about this thread. It is perfectly acceptable to post a second thread in a separate forum. So - get over your annoyance.

If you spam the boards with your "post this link on each new page". YOU will be in violation. Not the OP.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

It's no different than a computer algorithm scanning applications for a job -

That is 100% correct. Computers programs are programmed, they are instructed to do something and then if programmed properly, they will do "their" job, BUT l the computer program will ignore all the words except those it is programmed to "see".

a reply to: seasonal

The problem with ASCII emails is they are not exactly tamper proof.

People keep saying 650,000 e-mails..that's not including e-mail attachments and then figure out how pages per document, and you'll easily get up to 2 million pages or more. So they reviewed at least 2 million pages in a week. Making it even less plausible when you look at it this way.

a reply to: mkultra11

People keep saying 650,000 e-mails..that's not including e-mail attachments and then figure out how pages per document, and you'll easily get up to 2 million pages or more. So they reviewed at least 2 million pages in a week. Making it even less plausible when you look at it this way.

The quality of the search is only as good as the quality of the program that searches the emails.