It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Secondly, I want to say that upon reading the document in it's entirety and finding so many numerous and blatant grammar and spelling inconsistencies, I would have to seriously question the veracity of the author.
Correction: ...its entirety...
originally posted by: flatbush71
I'm not going to comment on the article, but there are thousands who can not write and spell worth a #, that are employed by various organizations. Anyone who uses that premise to determine if intel is legitimate or not, is in the wrong line work. I had meant to comment on this a long, long time ago. In many case misspelling and grammatical errors are intentional. Its a leak, for Christ's sake, not Mrs. Brown's english grammar class.
I had an aide for 9 years that did 100% of all my formal communications.
Look at all these emails that have been released. Hint, hint.
Buck
EDIT : The only Bravo that I knew personally, that always used perfect grammar was G. Gordon Liddy.
Believe it or don't.
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Advantage
Part of my job is reading police reports and etc from attorneys, prosecutors, etc. Good lord people... Ive founf FEW that can spell perfectly and have perfect grammar. I about rolled off of the chair when the legitimacy was questioned due to errors! LMAO!!
I've seen my share of them as well. I'm not outright discounting the claims therein. Additionally, the author's position is intentionally obfuscated so that we cant draw any conclusions on his or her authority to make such bold claims. Now I understand the need for personal protection under such circumstances, but if he or she espouses those "brave patriots" that he or she has worked along with, then he or she is not doing much in the way of being a patriot by hiding themselves away and releasing this information in obscurity.
Patriots don't hide, they lead.
Also, questioning something and it's veracity is tantamount to critical thinking. Are you suggesting we ALL should just let every claim be made sight unseen and accept it as fact? Sorry brother, aint gonna happen.
Nope, I meant exactly what I said.
ETA.. and its Sister, not brother.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: Fools
a reply to: carewemust
Well it has been confirmed publicly that Weiner checked into a sex addiction clinic. Or, more than likely a safe house?
Yeah, I'm guessing "the clinic" is code for some FBI safe house.
Last I heard, Huma hasn't been spotted since Weiner popped up again
Maybe she's in the "clinic" as well.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Advantage
Part of my job is reading police reports and etc from attorneys, prosecutors, etc. Good lord people... Ive founf FEW that can spell perfectly and have perfect grammar. I about rolled off of the chair when the legitimacy was questioned due to errors! LMAO!!
I've seen my share of them as well. I'm not outright discounting the claims therein. Additionally, the author's position is intentionally obfuscated so that we cant draw any conclusions on his or her authority to make such bold claims. Now I understand the need for personal protection under such circumstances, but if he or she espouses those "brave patriots" that he or she has worked along with, then he or she is not doing much in the way of being a patriot by hiding themselves away and releasing this information in obscurity.
Patriots don't hide, they lead.
Also, questioning something and it's veracity is tantamount to critical thinking. Are you suggesting we ALL should just let every claim be made sight unseen and accept it as fact? Sorry brother, aint gonna happen.
Nope, I meant exactly what I said.
ETA.. and its Sister, not brother.
Right.
Which was precisely, don't question its veracity if there seems to be inconsistencies...even in spelling.
Sorry, I will question every single thing about it until it's from a known and verified source. until then, it's simply propaganda.
ETA: I don't care which gender it is.
originally posted by: flatbush71
I'm not going to comment on the article, but there are thousands who can not write and spell worth a #, that are employed by various organizations. Anyone who uses that premise to determine if intel is legitimate or not, is in the wrong line work. I had meant to comment on this a long, long time ago. In many case misspelling and grammatical errors are intentional. Its a leak, for Christ's sake, not Mrs. Brown's english grammar class.
I had an aide for 9 years that did 100% of all my formal communications.
Look at all these emails that have been released. Hint, hint.
Buck
EDIT : The only Bravo that I knew personally, that always used perfect grammar was G. Gordon Liddy.
Believe it or don't.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: flatbush71
I'm not going to comment on the article, but there are thousands who can not write and spell worth a #, that are employed by various organizations. Anyone who uses that premise to determine if intel is legitimate or not, is in the wrong line work. I had meant to comment on this a long, long time ago. In many case misspelling and grammatical errors are intentional. Its a leak, for Christ's sake, not Mrs. Brown's english grammar class.
I had an aide for 9 years that did 100% of all my formal communications.
Look at all these emails that have been released. Hint, hint.
Buck
EDIT : The only Bravo that I knew personally, that always used perfect grammar was G. Gordon Liddy.
Believe it or don't.
Honestly, I think more along the lines of you being in the wrong line of work, if you cant discern the difference between pointing out inconsistencies from lambasting someone for poor spelling. The former I did, the latter I did not.
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Advantage
Part of my job is reading police reports and etc from attorneys, prosecutors, etc. Good lord people... Ive founf FEW that can spell perfectly and have perfect grammar. I about rolled off of the chair when the legitimacy was questioned due to errors! LMAO!!
I've seen my share of them as well. I'm not outright discounting the claims therein. Additionally, the author's position is intentionally obfuscated so that we cant draw any conclusions on his or her authority to make such bold claims. Now I understand the need for personal protection under such circumstances, but if he or she espouses those "brave patriots" that he or she has worked along with, then he or she is not doing much in the way of being a patriot by hiding themselves away and releasing this information in obscurity.
Patriots don't hide, they lead.
Also, questioning something and it's veracity is tantamount to critical thinking. Are you suggesting we ALL should just let every claim be made sight unseen and accept it as fact? Sorry brother, aint gonna happen.
Nope, I meant exactly what I said.
ETA.. and its Sister, not brother.
Right.
Which was precisely, don't question its veracity if there seems to be inconsistencies...even in spelling.
Sorry, I will question every single thing about it until it's from a known and verified source. until then, it's simply propaganda.
ETA: I don't care which gender it is.
You might care to not read into something very simple, grandious bullcrap and accuse posters of it though. Maybe. Might be a thought to keep in you head.
originally posted by: Advantage
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: flatbush71
I'm not going to comment on the article, but there are thousands who can not write and spell worth a #, that are employed by various organizations. Anyone who uses that premise to determine if intel is legitimate or not, is in the wrong line work. I had meant to comment on this a long, long time ago. In many case misspelling and grammatical errors are intentional. Its a leak, for Christ's sake, not Mrs. Brown's english grammar class.
I had an aide for 9 years that did 100% of all my formal communications.
Look at all these emails that have been released. Hint, hint.
Buck
EDIT : The only Bravo that I knew personally, that always used perfect grammar was G. Gordon Liddy.
Believe it or don't.
Honestly, I think more along the lines of you being in the wrong line of work, if you cant discern the difference between pointing out inconsistencies from lambasting someone for poor spelling. The former I did, the latter I did not.
AGAIN... you read into something simple something way way way out there. I meant what I said. No more or less. But you get your angst and whiny bichness out on me, you seem to need it. You see things that arent there and arent being said.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Fools
First of all, I just want to say that the title of this thread is hilarious to me, so there's that.
Secondly, I want to say that upon reading the document in it's entirety and finding so many numerous and blatant grammar and spelling inconsistencies, I would have to seriously question the veracity of the author.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
The NY Post has a picture of Weiner on horseback at his sex rehab facility from "this morning."
So either that picture is fake or the OP source has incredibly quick information feeds.
originally posted by: carewemust
is Huma with Hillary on the campaign Trail today?