It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: jtoj123
Stopped reading right here:
I can't say I know what is going on but I have solid faith in her but I am going to vote for her.
.
originally posted by: Throes
IRS also investigating Foundation:
www.dallasobserver.com...
A lot of investigations going on..
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: jtoj123
The Haitians picketing outside Clinton's offices think differently.
originally posted by: jtoj123
if there is evidence that she is guilty she should be tried and we should be informed so that a suitable candidate that represents the dem platform should be brought forward and the vote should be delayed. Suppose the Feds really do have all this evidence. That means in my estimation the election should not go forward. If they allow the elction to go forward knowing there is evidence to put her in jail, then I don't see how they can allow this election to go forward. There must be some election laws to prevent this circumstance. If the Feds or whoever it is witholding evidence then they must be guilty of something. they owe it to us to bring it forward. The only reason I can think as to why they are not is that it does not exist