It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
a reply to: reldra
If Clinton, for some sick reason does win, she won't hold onto that power for very long.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
That map assumes Hillary carries all the "Lean Democrat" states. There are some plump electoral votes there that are not sewn up.
Even with just the solid Democrat, she wins.
No, with the solid she only has 210.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
That map assumes Hillary carries all the "Lean Democrat" states. There are some plump electoral votes there that are not sewn up.
Even with just the solid Democrat, she wins.
No, with the solid she only has 210.
Ans with solid Republican, what is Trump's count?
One red state has both senators supporting her and Texas OWNED by the Bush family. They support her.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
That map assumes Hillary carries all the "Lean Democrat" states. There are some plump electoral votes there that are not sewn up.
Even with just the solid Democrat, she wins.
No, with the solid she only has 210.
Ans with solid Republican, what is Trump's count?
One red state has both senators supporting her and Texas OWNED by the Bush family. They support her.
This thread is about Hillary, not Trump. Stay on topic.
Trump falls into a lot of those categories, besides being incureably stupid.
By federal statute the electors for each state are required to cast their votes in mid-December, after which the votes are sealed and sent to the president of the U.S. Senate. Though the public votes for the party as a whole, the electors cast individual votes on separate ballots for president and vice president. This has become important in several elections in which electors voted for candidates other than those to whom they were pledged.
[SNIP]
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
That map assumes Hillary carries all the "Lean Democrat" states. There are some plump electoral votes there that are not sewn up.
Even with just the solid Democrat, she wins.
No, with the solid she only has 210.
Ans with solid Republican, what is Trump's count?
One red state has both senators supporting her and Texas OWNED by the Bush family. They support her.
This thread is about Hillary, not Trump. Stay on topic.
It is my thread. It is the fact that she will surpass Trump in the electorate, so that is definitely part of it.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: reldra
But if one is going to vote and they vote Trump, I would find them to be lacking a lot of brain cells.
This is why no one will take you seriously.
There are a lot of intelligent people who are voting Trump. Likewise, I happen to have many friends whom I know to be intelligent people that are also voting Clinton. We disagree, but I don't generalize.
For you to put all Trump supporters into a category of ignorants is to say that it is impossible for an intelligent person to find legitimate reasons to support Trump.
Your statement is a subtle pantomime of Hillary's deplorable comment.