It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Indigo5
Early voting is underway in many states, and things seem to look good for Democrats.
CNN suggests that Democrats have improved their standing in Arizona and Nevada, compared with 2012. Democrats also are voting at high rates in the key battlegrounds of Florida and North Carolina, according to news reports"
What a completely bizarre thing to report.
Why would the Washington Post look at "news reports" when Florida posts the actual statistics of the votes cast, so far?
In Florida...so far, republicans have cast more votes:
Link
It's interesting how that was spun into 'early voting looks good for Hillary.'
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Which isn't very likely so....
She's ahead in New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Nevada, plus all the traditionally blue states.
Trump needs to wrestle those swing states away from her plus some blue one.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Indigo5
Which is unchanged from prior to Comeys error.
That news is not having the affect that the GOP was hoping for.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Indigo5
Early voting is underway in many states, and things seem to look good for Democrats.
CNN suggests that Democrats have improved their standing in Arizona and Nevada, compared with 2012. Democrats also are voting at high rates in the key battlegrounds of Florida and North Carolina, according to news reports"
What a completely bizarre thing to report.
Why would the Washington Post look at "news reports" when Florida posts the actual statistics of the votes cast, so far?
In Florida...so far, republicans have cast more votes:
Link
It's interesting how that was spun into 'early voting looks good for Hillary.'
Your link shows party affiliation, Dem, GOP, Independent...it does not show who voted for whom.
Noted though that FL will likely go to Trump..by a hair..
originally posted by: Indigo5
but then he has to go on to win GA - NC - OH - IA - AZ - CO - NV
North Carolina and NV are his worries after Florida. GA, OH, IA will likely go his way. NV? Maybe. CO? Very Unlikely, but possible...then NC.
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: jrod
Nate Silver has updated his forecast.
It includes Trump taking Florida and Clinton winning 304 to 232
projects.fivethirtyeight.com...
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Indigo5
Which is unchanged from prior to Comeys error.
That news is not having the affect that the GOP was hoping for.
originally posted by: netwarrior
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: jrod
Nate Silver has updated his forecast.
It includes Trump taking Florida and Clinton winning 304 to 232
projects.fivethirtyeight.com...
Same Nate Silver that said Trump had no chance of winning a primary, much less the whole nomination? Yeah, that's what I thought.
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I understood. But the vote totals you linked to showed a virtual tie in GOP and Dem early voting...and Florida has more GOP than Dem.
Put another way, I think the WAPO article wasn't stating that FL had more Dems early voting, but rather early turn-out showed more Dems voting than usual..but not looking to tussle on the matter, I still think FL will go trump.
originally posted by: LifeMode
Trump has gone up by over 15 pts since Friday according to Five Thirty Eight, a medium of like 30+ polls . What are you talking about no affect? Just flipped Fla today. I'm not saying he will win just that it had a big time effect on the situation. If you want to ignore 30+ polls that is your choice.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
originally posted by: Indigo5
but then he has to go on to win GA - NC - OH - IA - AZ - CO - NV
North Carolina and NV are his worries after Florida. GA, OH, IA will likely go his way. NV? Maybe. CO? Very Unlikely, but possible...then NC.
As far as the other states go. I don't see Hillary taking Nevada with how much of a strong opposition to Federal overreach the population has. Just look at the armed protest against the Bundy incident in 2014, those are not the types of people who look forward to a Hillary candidacy.
Arizona - is a key battle for Cartel trafficking and crime due to wide open borer policies, again, the demands of the citizens in AZ are not in line with what Hillary is pushing. Hell, many there are clamoring for a wall, they live on the front lines of a mongrel and criminal invasion from the South.
Georgia - Really???? You really think there is a question to who this is going to grab Georgia?? Have you actually interacted with the humans in Georgia??? Outside of Atlanta, its alot of us "gun toting bible thumping deplorables" .
Colorado - , hmm many of the citizens and even Sheriffs there are not happy with the governors second amendment infringements he signed into law. That will translate into a revolt at the polls. Although I am worried the marijuana may have pacified them a bit more than needed.
I don't know enough abut Ohio and Iowa though to make a reasonable assessment.
North Carolina, well thats a pretty diverse place as well, so no telling how that one will go.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
ETA: We aren't tussling...just discussing. I don't see how the WaPo spun Florida's numbers into being good for Hillary.
Trump’s team also knows where its fate will be decided. It’s built a model, the
“Battleground Optimizer Path to Victory,”
to weight and rank the states that the data team believes are most critical to amassing the 270 electoral votes Trump needs to win the White House.
On Oct. 18 they rank as follows: Florida (“If we don’t win, we’re cooked,” says an official), Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Georgia.
And her 1996 suggestion that some African American males are “super predators” is the basis of a below-the-radar effort to discourage infrequent black voters from showing up at the polls—particularly in Florida.
...
On Oct. 24, Trump’s team began placing spots on select African American radio stations.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I understood. But the vote totals you linked to showed a virtual tie in GOP and Dem early voting...and Florida has more GOP than Dem.
Put another way, I think the WAPO article wasn't stating that FL had more Dems early voting, but rather early turn-out showed more Dems voting than usual..but not looking to tussle on the matter, I still think FL will go trump.
That's wrong.
Voter registration (Republican) -- 4,500,960
Voter registration (Democrat) -- 4,800,905
Link
ETA: We aren't tussling...just discussing. I don't see how the WaPo spun Florida's numbers into being good for Hillary.