'Clinton's black son' to make 'bombshell announcement'

What if he has audio of Hilary threatening him?

Lot's of possibilities...

a reply to: pianopraze

What if he has audio of Hilary threatening him?

Could you imagine that, he is young enough to not know who he is messing with and therefore not know the cost of the purchase he is making at the press conference.

Poor kid says he went to bed hungry many times.

And, the whole time his dad was the President.

originally posted by: schuyler

The issue may be one of Hillary interfering or somehow "taking out" the Mom.

'May' being the operative word. If that's true then sure I see your point.

It's a technique she used when she defended a rapist

Are you suggesting he shouldn't have had a defense lawyer? It was her job. That's how the legal system works.

and got him off by questioning the reputation of the accuser, then bragged about it.

I've listened to the entire audio interview multiple times. I didn't hear her brag about it. Is that what you're referring to when you say she 'bragged' about it? Can you link it if it's something else?

originally posted by: seasonal

Bill denies his son, you say that won't change your mind.

We are assuming 1. he's actually his son 2. Hillary has some malicious involvement in this. Both these things need to be proven for it to change my mind.

It was mentioned Hillary might have even "taken out the mom". Okay, why are we entertaining that notion? Do we have reason to?

originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: NthOther

How was I being defensive? Seemed like a sensible question to me.

I agree, it is a sensible question. For one, it is old news, for another, it has to do with Bill not Hillary, and for yet another an illegitimate child (that isn't yours) has nothing to do with ruling the country well or not.

Also, if Bill had sex with a black woman that is not a big deal either for Dems. Maybe it is for Republicans.

originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy

It was mentioned Hillary might have even "taken out the mom". Okay, why are we entertaining that notion? Do we have reason to?

I think that was mentioned due to the treatment that Hillary gave to Bill's other victims and mistresses.
Her abuse of and threats towards them are well known.

a reply to: Lucid Lunacy

Hillary has some malicious involvement in this

From my perspective, with her horn dog hubby, it is a possibility that this young man is his, there for an huge inconvenience (and she secretly wishes he would have never been").

In America it is the correct thing to take responsibility for your actions. I'm sure she preached that as a senator, and would preach it again if America was silly enough to shoot our collective foot and elect someone who possibly has been allowing a spouse to be a dead beat 125 X millionaire.

originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
originally posted by: schuyler

The issue may be one of Hillary interfering or somehow "taking out" the Mom.

'May' being the operative word. If that's true then sure I see your point.

It's a technique she used when she defended a rapist

Are you suggesting he shouldn't have had a defense lawyer? It was her job. That's how the legal system works.

and got him off by questioning the reputation of the accuser, then bragged about it.

I've listened to the entire audio interview multiple times. I didn't hear her brag about it. Is that what you're referring to when you say she 'bragged' about it? Can you link it if it's something else?

originally posted by: seasonal

Bill denies his son, you say that won't change your mind.

We are assuming 1. he's actually his son 2. Hillary has some malicious involvement in this. Both these things need to be proven for it to change my mind.

It was mentioned Hillary might have even "taken out the mom". Okay, why are we entertaining that notion? Do we have reason to?

I gave you a straightforward answer to your question, just as you asked. "It may be, etc...." Last time you complained that you weren't really defensive by asking the question. I think it is obvious that this time, you are. You want to question and oppose every sentence I wrote. So much for me giving you a straightforward answer.

But you have proven my point. I knew you would. You don't care that your gal is a crook. You'll find a way to explain away everything she does. And you know what? I really don't give a crap what you think. We'll see what this young fellow has to say tomorrow. If I'm right, you'll know it, but I know you'll find a way to avoid the issues once again.

a reply to: darkbake

I agree, it is a sensible question

. For one, it is old news, for another, it has to do with Bill not Hillary, and for yet another an illegitimate child (that isn't yours) has nothing to do with ruling the country well or not. Also, if Bill had sex with a black woman that is not a big deal either for Dems. Maybe it is for Republicans.

Like it or not Hill and Bill are a married couple, and with his horn dogged history it is a possibility that this young man is his. Both these "leaders" preach to us unwashed about family, person responsibility, love, devotion, good old Christian values.
But as the world knows, Hillary is still married to a serial cheater. She needs to step up and do the right thing and compel Bill to do the right thing. That thing is taking care of his mess. That means financially taking responsibility at the least, after all they are 125 X millionaires.

So not only are we regaled with a constant barrage of unproven hypotheticals regarding the email investigation, but now we've got Bill Clinton's unsubstantiated black son to contend with? Along with all the made up stuff about the wiki leaks?

Hillary is no saint, but election season might as well be April Fool's.

originally posted by: schuyler
it would hurt "our" view of Hillary, although truth be told, her rabid allocates don't seem to care how corrupt, crooked, and despicable she is.

Schuy- I think You meant to use the word "Acolyte" One who is led around by a leader, usually w/their melons secreted so far up the leader's sphincter that they will parrot the leader's words and defend/deflect any deeds perpetrated by that leader...

They were the 2 turds who followed around both "The Undertaker" and "Kain" from the World Wrestling Federation. They did the "dirty work" like throw fold-up chairs and the like..

Will HRC Acolytes get paid if Hillary ends up in Jail?
Will She ask to be incarcerated in a "Private Prison" Maybe someone should scour Her un-secured e-mails and see how much $$$ She has extracted from the Private Prison Lobby..

Extra Credit: Doesn't it 'royally' suck that this is the stable of picks that We have to choose from?

How pissed do You think Bernie Sanders is now? You know after He got screwed By Hillary et al?

originally posted by: Greggers
So not only are we regaled with a constant barrage of unproven hypotheticals regarding the email investigation, but now we've got Bill Clinton's unsubstantiated black son to contend with? Along with all the made up stuff about the wiki leaks?

Hillary is no saint, but election season might as well be April Fool's.

And yet all the other side of the aisle has is unsubstantiated rumours of being a chauvinist and not much more.

Weird that isn't it? Especially when one takes into account the amount exposure in the news given to each...

a reply to: Greggers

Yes, yes she is a victim of a huge conspiracy. This of course started with the Watergate investigation when:

Details of Hillary Clinton’s firing from the House Judiciary Committee staff for unethical behavior as she helped prepare articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon have been confirmed by the panel’s chief Republican counsel. Read more at www.wnd.com...

From then on the poor poor HRC, and for that matter her poor poor philandering Husband have been the target of people singling them out. After all the odds of become president is like 1 in 17,000,000, so they were really held back. Oh and they are 125 X millionaire. Gosh I shed tears for someone who is so disadvantaged and treated so poorly.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: seasonal

NEW YORK – Danney Williams, the man from Little Rock, Arkansas, who has claimed since the 1990s to be the black illegitimate son of former President Bill Clinton, will hold a press conference Tuesday at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., to make an announcement his supporters characterize as a “bombshell that will rock Hillary’s campaign.” Read more at www.wnd.com...

Wow what a week for HRC. I wonder how much of this is orchestrated?

The conference will be hosted by a non-partisan coalition of civil rights, child-welfare and pro-life leaders.

Hosted bu profilers, this is a vial of holy water or a cross to the Clintons.

WND reported Oct. 19 that lawyers representing Williams, in the hours before the third and final presidential debate in Las Vegas, announced their intention to file a paternity suit demanding DNA evidence from the former president.

This is a big scary skeleton in a big old scary closet. Is this going to be the main subject of press conference? What are your thoughts?

www.wnd.com...

Unless he somehow obtained a DNA sample outside of regular channels and had it tested and it came back positive for WJC being the dad, not really sure what kind of bombshell he could drop.

Or maybe a bank statement with deposits of some sort coming from a Clinton foundation? I could see that rocking a few minds.

Anywho...pretty old story and I look at it similar to the ones of the sex assault women against trump happening to come out decades later.

They already have his DNA signature from the cum stained Monica dress. Go get a court order to compare them. If it's a match he owes him back pay for child support.

a reply to: LifeMode

Your point?

a reply to: schuyler

I gave you a straightforward answer to your question, just as you asked. "It may be, etc...."

Yes. Which I said if that's the case then i'll see your point. I gave a reply to your straightforward answer. It's called a discussion.

You don't care that your gal is a crook.

I'm not pro-Hillary. I'm anti-Trump. I'm consistently so on ATS and elsewhere. You're making assumptions about me. This entire thread is about assumptions. Apparently you don't care about doing that.

I really don't give a crap what you think.

Am I supposed to give a crap you don't?

but I know you'll find a way to avoid the issues once again.

Like how you avoided my questions?

My guess is he will announce the test is positive, that he's Bill Clinton's son, and Bill wanted his "girlfriend" to abort.

originally posted by: LifeMode

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: seasonal

NEW YORK – Danney Williams, the man from Little Rock, Arkansas, who has claimed since the 1990s to be the black illegitimate son of former President Bill Clinton, will hold a press conference Tuesday at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., to make an announcement his supporters characterize as a “bombshell that will rock Hillary’s campaign.” Read more at www.wnd.com...

Wow what a week for HRC. I wonder how much of this is orchestrated?

The conference will be hosted by a non-partisan coalition of civil rights, child-welfare and pro-life leaders.

Hosted bu profilers, this is a vial of holy water or a cross to the Clintons.

WND reported Oct. 19 that lawyers representing Williams, in the hours before the third and final presidential debate in Las Vegas, announced their intention to file a paternity suit demanding DNA evidence from the former president.

This is a big scary skeleton in a big old scary closet. Is this going to be the main subject of press conference? What are your thoughts?

www.wnd.com...

Unless he somehow obtained a DNA sample outside of regular channels and had it tested and it came back positive for WJC being the dad, not really sure what kind of bombshell he could drop.

Or maybe a bank statement with deposits of some sort coming from a Clinton foundation? I could see that rocking a few minds.

Anywho...pretty old story and I look at it similar to the ones of the sex assault women against trump happening to come out decades later.

They already have his DNA signature from the cum stained Monica dress. Go get a court order to compare them. If it's a match he owes him back pay for child support.

Unless he's been paying more in hush money for a while....then it's just that the kid wants recognition.

originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: seasonal

Why should this possibility hurt our view of Hillary?..

Uh, the announcement is tomorrow.

How are you dismissing what hasnt been revealed yet?

Ive noticed this is a popular technique among the HRC supporters.

Pretend nothing means anything with regards to Hillary's campaign.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: LifeMode

Your point?

He's making this way too complicated. File a lawsuit and get the DNA compared. He could actually go through a state agency. The laws on child support are very strict. Or, just get a waiter at a venue to take his glass and bag it. Then if it checks out file a lawsuit. Not that complicated. He has been traveling around the country like crazy. Water bottles, plastic cups...he's drinking out of something.