Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside

a reply to: ssenerawa

no, he's just heading to court over rape charges.
and over the trump university scandal..
not to mention that he seems not to be able to go over a half an hour without his alternate personality showing up then he's off to the races, jumping from one idea to the next.

but, I'll be kind to him and say that I have a feeling that if he did happen to win the election, he'd probably shift most of his responsibility to pence and probably spend his time chasing after the pretty interns. and the worst I can say about pence is that he'd probably spend his time trying to turn the country into a theocracy, but otherwise, probably wouldn't be that bad...

and well, if the emails did happen to bring hillary down, we'd end up with kaine, who again would be that bad....
and.....
I can't believe that someone brought up the point that he's catholic and therefore not a good choice....

from Rapha

Imagine for a moment what America will become after the Pope stated that America must down size during his Sept 2015 visit and Jesuit Tim Kaine being POTUS.

The globalists want hell on earth and with Romes recent 6.6 earthquake, Lucifer has probably birthed out his little antiChrist through the cracks in the earths crust now.

I feel like I am going backwards in time...

a reply to: DAVID64

I want charges brought against her. If she broke the law, we all deserve justice. Until then, gossip.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: crazyewok

That is a stupid and reckless move and does not benfit the USA but puts YOU and the world in mortal danger.

So, your advice to Hillary Clinton and all our military Chiefs of Staff and generals is to cede the area to Russia and Assad?

Yes.

1) what benfit is it to USA or western national security? None

2) Do the benfits of involvement out weight the risks? No

3) does the USA have any treatys or obligations to Syria or its people? No

4) Can the USA (bearing in mind its past involvement in ME affairs) have any hope of improving the situation? No



Western involvement against assad is pointless, useless and most of all risky military adventurism that serves no benfit.

a reply to: ssenerawa

LOL. I am 66 and have been voting since the 70's. I am history.

a reply to: crazyewok

Okay then, I guess YOU and Donald Trump know more about ISIS than our generals and military Chiefs of Staff!

Let me let you in a little secret. Donald Trump won't be able to affect the Military Industrial Complex one iota!

Russia still has enough money in their coffers to make a charitable donation to the Clinton Foundation and maybe a few speeches from Bill.

Once they have "kissed the ring" the whole idea if WWIII will be forgotten and the world will move on.

I worry more about those groups and individuals that do not have the ability to buy their way into the Clinton graces.

a reply to: crazyewok

The only ones who can bring peace to the ME are the ones who live there. There is no messiah or savior that will unite them. Until they govern as a unified democratic society. So since you are concerned with the future, how do you see that coming about? Maybe you should relocate.

a reply to: windword

You're anti trump rhetoric is weak. Talk about something real like lying under oath, negligence with classified material or million dollar donations from groups classified terrorist organizations under the state department.

a reply to: ssenerawa

You're anti trump rhetoric is weak.

Donald Trump is weak! And, if elected will go down as the weakest prescient in American history!

Go read the National Democratic and the National Republican party platforms and then get back to me.

a reply to: windword

Literally. What does that have to do with any pertinent information or recent revelations.

Putin isn't about to go launching nukes at us, and Hillary won't either. both are smart enough and sane enough to know that there is no winner in that.
trump, on the other hand, it's like handing the nukes over to a child! they guy can't even be trusted with a twitter account and you think the nukes would be safer with him??

a reply to: ssenerawa

Party platforms have everything to do with the selection process of our political leaders and informs us what they will do and try to accomplish once they're in office.

You're the one who said that we should do some research. Maybe you should take your own advice.

a reply to: dawnstar

Right! These threats from Putin, that Hillary will lead us to war with them, LOL, are just cage rattling and showmanship. It shows that Putin is trying to affect the election results, AND, that he thinks he has Trump in his pocket.

a reply to: windword

Russia and it's allies are working on a way to give countries a way to to get out from under the petro-dollar... and that is what has been giving us an economic advantage over the rest of the world. I can understand why the rest of the world would want to get out from under it, after all we've proven to be bad stewards recently with the housing crash and securities fraud and all that. but at the same time, it will be very bad if we lose that standing...
morally, we shouldn't be in the middles east and meddling and I believe Russian is really on the moral high ground here. but as an american, I think america has to do what it has to do here...
and, I think trump is going into this not realizing the whole picture here.

a reply to: mobiusmale

Clinton is a selfish piece of work that had no business running. She did it for her own selfishness, greed, and hunger for power. She and Trump have brought America to rock bottom. I despise them both!

That said, she'll never step aside willingly. That much is obvious.

a reply to: windword

Youre really talking to me about party platforms?

originally posted by: dawnstar
I feel like I am going backwards in time...

Lucifer and the globalists never evolve. They do not have the brain capacity of the human mind as all angels are linear 2D thinkers. They love dictatorships where war is fun whilst they send peasant cannon fodder into their battle arenas.

The world has gone right back to medieval times where kings and queens kill off excess peasants. Same sht, different day.

a reply to: DAVID64

I couldn't agree with your post more.

This isn't about Trump being mean anymore, the Clinton supporters that keep side stepping her corruption without holding any idea of thought in my opinion are as guilty as she is for complicity letting her get away with it. This election is about are country's constitution, government corruption, and standing in the world. If people cannot come to reason on why Hillary is part of everything bad in the world its a sad sad day.

a reply to: windword


Ummm...HELLO...The "AREA"...is Syria and Assad the elected president...
Russia was invited in as an ally of the government of Syria...while the coalition of destabilization...who have been supporting "moderate" terrorists...are only there to continue the Libya model...




YouSir

a reply to: Rapha

actually, I was responding to your post because it kind of gave me the impression you were saying kaine was a good choice because he was catholic. which, was also said about kennedy.
both of which, I am pretty sure, are human!!!