It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Annee
You are entitled to your opinion.
I am, and it happens to be shared by many.
originally posted by: Encryptor
a reply to: intrptr
hehe... oh she'll fall .... hard.
originally posted by: Encryptor
a reply to: dreamingawake
Trump has this one. Hillary will burn in hell.
Cheers
originally posted by: imjack
originally posted by: Encryptor
a reply to: dreamingawake
Trump has this one. Hillary will burn in hell.
Cheers
If Trump wins, just promise the he will reform the Presidential Election into a reality-TV show, where he finds the next POTUS.
Maybe he can call it The Pupil or something.
originally posted by: imjack
originally posted by: Encryptor
a reply to: dreamingawake
Trump has this one. Hillary will burn in hell.
Cheers
If Trump wins, just promise the he will reform the Presidential Election into a reality-TV, where he finds the next POTUS.
Maybe he can call it The Pupil or something.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Encryptor
Need to do what? Protest or invade? If we become violent we play into their hands. Gandhi and MLK both stated if you can't demonstrate without becoming violent, don't come to the Marches.
Non violent protest is really hard to carry off nowadays, the gubment has agitators that infiltrate and manipulate movements to become destructive to property or violent towards police, whatever.
Then the media focus on the violence, discrediting the movement in the main stream. Back during the last civil rights and anti war demonstrations during the mid to late sixties, the media just reported on events instead of manipulating the mass mind.
Maybe both? I don't know yet. We needn't become Violent animals to prove the point. Unless you're Gandhi or MLK.. then Violence means something.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Encryptor
Maybe both? I don't know yet. We needn't become Violent animals to prove the point. Unless you're Gandhi or MLK.. then Violence means something.
MLK was very specific. "If you can't take a police baton to the head without raising a fist and fighting back then you aren't welcome on a Peace March".
Him and Gandhi insisted on this non violence because they both knew the minute theres a response to police abuse or brutality that justifies the use of full force to break it up. Tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs in a riot are what makes the nightly news.
If all the cameras can cover is peaceful protesters being beat up, then thats what stirs the masses to anger against the authorities instead. One results in sympathy for the cause the other sympathy for the state.
This is key. Like I said, nowadays, agitators and infiltrators hijack demonstrations by destroying property, starting fires and throwing rocks at police.
originally posted by: Darkmadness
Just went through multiple pages of info and couldn't find a single post that actually discusses the info in the video.
WTF!!!!!!
originally posted by: Bluesma
I would like to see if anyone has really vetted the info in this video.