Secret messages hidden within the SPAM of the Podesta Emails ?

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Great link Vasa!

There are terrific tools (like PGP and GPG) for encrypting your mail. If somebody along the way looks at the mail they can't understand it. But they do know you are sending encrypted mail to your pal.

The answer: encode your message into something innocent looking.

Your messages will be safe and nobody will know they're encrypted!

There is tons of spam flying around the Internet. Most people can't delete it fast enough. It's virtually invisible. This site gives you access to a program that will encrypt a short message into spam. Basically, the sentences it outputs vary depending on the message you are encoding. Real spam is so stupidly written it's sometimes hard to tell the machine written spam from the genuine article.

Explanation

Sometimes the best place to hide something is in plain sight whereas hiding something in an obscure out of the way place is a sure method to attract attention to it.

If you want to trade secret communication and not look like you are hiding secret communication, this would be an ideal way to do so.



a reply to: roadgravel

how about a 4chan member...

Certainly a possibility.



Another thing to keep in mind is that Comey said that when they were investigating, all that was looked at was subject lines, not the entire contents of an email. Might this have been a way that incriminating communication would have not been found?

The email headers might help resolve the spam versus secret email issue.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

That's the way the CIA did it with news paper classifieds long ago...this is just an updated method and not hard to believe at all really.

Spam mimic is just an example...they could easily have a tool built just like it that was distributed and used with a specific encryption that all they had to do was copy the body of the email and paste into the program and voila....message appears. And unless you have the program with the decryption key you can't read it.

Very covert!

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Keep up the good work j&c!

Your threads represent the epitome of ATS.

Eff Soros. Such a cancer to Our democracy!

What the spam has in common shows that Podesta had specific filters to SAVE any email that mentions Soros and other keywords.

THAT shows me that someone from Soros' machine is secretly communicating with him and others through spam.
I think the 'Gold' spam references are Rothschild secret communications.

Another comment from the Mos Eisley of the internet:

Alright lads, even if the spam weren't anything other than spam, the fact that it inserts relevant dummy text to avoid the slam filter means that someone is compromised.

The program runs on a client phone or computer and scans all conversations. Then it reports back the content to another service that fetches snippets of text that are related to thw emails AND IN DOING SO AVOIDS THE SPAM FILTER.

This means that all the communication on one of these accounts was being uploaded to some nefarious spam service somewhere.

Aka national security secrets leaked out to God knows where.

If it is just spam, as mentioned above, someone in the communication circle of the power players (remember Podesta worked for Obama and is now Hillary's campaign chair) had their communications compromised.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Reminds me of the way people use to pass messages in classified ads back in the day.

So Podesta has a spam filter that singles out and save's keyword 'Soros' spam.

He clicks the link which is a drop box exclusive to him...and one which is available for a limited time.

The website opens to him only...where he may read an actual communique from George Soros.
Once read, it is deleted on the spam site...and after a month or two, the site is closed...and another is set up.

Lather-Rinse-Repeat.

So what are the "secret messages" that have been found?

originally posted by: introvert
So what are the "secret messages" that have been found?

Yoga and wedding arrangements.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Digital dead-drops. I could see that.

Well, if this topic gets inundated with ravening hoards of 'it's nothing,' that might be an indication of something there.

If it is just passed over and eventually fades to background noise then that might indicate normal SPAM.

In either case, we still have high level insiders communication compromised in such a way as to indicate horrid OpSec practices; and these are the people who will be running the show under a Hillary circus.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Why would Wikileaks (assuming it is them) re-register this domain today and add a redirect to them?

Perhaps it''s Team Satan, I mean Clinton, who purchased the site and redirected it to Wiki to make it look like they are involved to try and discredit them?

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Why would Wikileaks (assuming it is them) re-register this domain today and add a redirect to them?

Perhaps it''s Team Satan, I mean Clinton, who purchased the site and redirected it to Wiki to make it look like they are involved to try and discredit them?

Or it could be WL picking up the abandoned domain name...in order to say "We Know What You Were Doing".

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Or it could be WL picking up the abandoned domain name...in order to say "We Know What You Were Doing".

You know, that does fit in with their (Assange's) sense of humour...

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Another thing to keep in mind is that Comey said that when they were investigating, all that was looked at was subject lines, not the entire contents of an email. Might this have been a way that incriminating communication would have not been found?

Comey's a "real winner", isn't he, not to have thought of this. Sloppy sloppy sloppy investigation, imo. Does he really belong as Director of the FBI? Does he even belong IN the FBI?!

J&C, you rock! This thread is fascinating and one I definitely want to keep up with.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: introvert
So what are the "secret messages" that have been found?

Yoga and wedding arrangements.

So nothing secret then?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical
I think this makes the most sense. Kinda like the invisible ink.

Again, who were they hiding from at that point?

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
I think this makes the most sense. Kinda like the invisible ink.

Again, who were they hiding from at that point?

Insurance against potential future email subpoena?

Could the Wiki link be a covert setup to say hey Wikileaks set us up ?

Do others here have faith that the email headers in this copy from WK are unchanged?