is the movie "Tommy boy" proof of the mandela effect?

is the scene where tommy says into his desk fan "Luke, Luke I am your father." proof that the history of the universe has been altered and that the mandela effect is real? after richard starts to leave the room tommy tells richard that its from starwars.

this is the scene in question.
www.youtube.com...
remember this movie was in 1995



this is the starwars reference where darth vader says no. i am your father.
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: Belcastro

People think that's the line because if you were trying to reference it in real life, saying "no, I am your father" people might not get it, but if you say "Luke" instead then people immediately recognize that you're quoting Star Wars.

Which is why Tommy Boy did that.

It's always been "No, I am your Father."

It's actually proof that the "Mandela effect" is nonsense.

If the timeline of the universe HAD been changed, you would never have experienced the other line, as from your point of view it would never have happened that way, and thus you would not remember it whatsoever. So there can't BE a 'Mandela effect'.

What you're seeing instead is that most people's memories work somewhat alike, and have the same types of errors.

a reply to: Belcastro

OMG! I thought it was just me that thought this! YES, absolutely Tommy Boy is proof of the Mandela effect!!

If you go 45 minutes in and pause it at frame 18 you'll see a poster of The Who's album for Tommy. "T" is the 20th letter of the alphabet. There are no letter T's in "Mandela" but there ARE two A's and one E, which, if you add them up, you get 20. And there are two A's in Star Wars (18), but if you add the two S's, then you get 20!

What's in question I'm confused??

originally posted by: Belcastro
is the scene where tommy says into his desk fan "Luke, Luke I am your father." proof that the history of the universe has been altered and that the mandela effect is real?

No, because, as myself and others have been saying, had he said the REAL quote, "No, I am your father" -- many people would not have picked up on the reference.

Changing the quote, as in to contextualise it, by saying "Luke, I am your father" uses the easily identifiable name "Luke" to contextualise the reference to Star Wars ESB.

There is no such thing as ME. It's your own memory being incorrect. Get over it.

i dont see the point of having luke i am your father in the movie at all unless thats how it really was once.

a reply to: Belcastro

I believe the Mandela Effect to be real, yet I would not count that as proof of it.

originally posted by: Belcastro
i dont see the point of having luke i am your father in the movie at all unless thats how it really was once.

It really was, but somewhere else.

originally posted by: thesungod
a reply to: Belcastro

People think that's the line because if you were trying to reference it in real life, saying "no, I am your father" people might not get it, but if you say "Luke" instead then people immediately recognize that you're quoting Star Wars.

Which is why Tommy Boy did that.

It's always been "No, I am your Father."

If you start with "People think that's the line because...." You really don;t understand this concept at all.

originally posted by: FuggleHop
a reply to: Belcastro

OMG! I thought it was just me that thought this! YES, absolutely Tommy Boy is proof of the Mandela effect!!

If you go 45 minutes in and pause it at frame 18 you'll see a poster of The Who's album for Tommy. "T" is the 20th letter of the alphabet. There are no letter T's in "Mandela" but there ARE two A's and one E, which, if you add them up, you get 20. And there are two A's in Star Wars (18), but if you add the two S's, then you get 20!

Your posts are not really helping.

a reply to: reldra

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Rel believes in the ME...

originally posted by: thesungod
a reply to: reldra

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Rel believes in the ME...

You just realized this today?

I will also tell you I believe all the Chemtrails stuff.

There may be a few other things you missed that I am interested in. We are on a conspiracy website. Just thought i would save you
another long bwahaha.

i dont understand why you would say that, if it has always been no i am your father then people shouldnt need you to say luke because its a famous movie quote and supposedly recognized by anyone whos ever seen starwars.

originally posted by: Belcastro
i dont understand why you would say that, if it has always been no i am your father then people shouldnt need you to say luke because its a famous movie quote and supposedly recognized by anyone whos ever seen starwars.

There are some people that remember it differently. Even James Earl Jones, in interviews says 'Luke, I am your father'. But that doesn't seem to be enough evidence to sway people who remember it another way.

a reply to: reldra

I don't look at ME stuff, I don't believe it. I just know the answer to the star wars one.

Chemtrails are real, but they aren't on civilian flights and they are not for geoengineering. I'm not going to say anymore on that topic though.

a reply to: Belcastro

Because, not everyone, especially the young'ins of today, have seen the original Star Wars films, or were around when SW:ESB was out in the cinemas and the the shock of finding out vader was Luke's father.

So, to add context to the ambiguous quote of NIAYF, it was changed by adverts, media, pop culture, sitcoms, etc, to give it a frame of reference --"Luke, I am your father" so it became very clear this was a reference to Vader and Luke.

And, as this has been used for ages OUTSIDE of Star Wars, the chances are far more likely you and many others who were not die hard SW fans like myself, remember it wrong as LIAYF, when the quote was always, NIAYF.

Simple as that. No Mandala Effect needed. Just you being influence by the people and world around you.

a reply to: Belcastro

Because it's not in the script that way. It's not in the print that way. It's not on the old VHS that way. Or ANY other format.

This is purely psychological confabulation.

For crying out loud, this is not proof of anything. Why do people use the word "proof" so freely? It has always been "no, I am your father" in Star Wars. People SAY "Luke, I am your father" for reasons that have already been mentioned here.