It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: underwerks
What are your questions exactly. Spell them out and maybe we can help you.
Is there absolute proof that Obama was sending emails under that pseudonym besides someone saying they "believed" he did?
I'm not sure that people are understanding the context of Huma's FBI interview. It was the FBI who told Huma they believed the email address, in question, was a pseudonym email address used by Obama.
So, their totally awesome and thorough investigation LED THE FBI TO BELIEVE THE ADDRESS BELONGED TO OBAMA.
It wasn't Huma who simply believed the address belonged to Obama without having done any investigation into it at all.
ETA: So, If the FBI believes it to be true, then they must have some concrete, evidentiary basis for believing it.
I understand the context I've been shown so far. That's what I have a problem with. I'm not going to base something I think on someone's speculation about the FBI's speculation. I don't trust the FBI, so forgive me for not just assuming they have proof because they said they "believe" something.
Maybe someone could give me the numbers of the emails so I can check them out on wikileaks myself and see the entire context.
...She recounted that when CLINTON changed her primary email address they had to notify the White House so that CLINTON's emails would not be rejected by the server...
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: butcherguy
Mean's nothing to me. That's Ms. Mills problem. It doesn't implicate Obama nor Clinton.
There was nothing illegal in Obama communicating the Sectetary of State through a private email, and I doubt that the President even took the time to look up the address that the emails were being sent to.
This is such a non-issue!
and you still make this kind of argument
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
There is also a part in the FBI interview with Huma that says:
...She recounted that when CLINTON changed her primary email address they had to notify the White House so that CLINTON's emails would not be rejected by the server...
FBI.gov
The White House was notified specifically as to the change in email address. Not to mention that this was a new email address on the same domain as the prior email address.
The White House had known all along that she was not using an @state.gov email address.
Fingers in ears and heads in the sand only excuse so much.
originally posted by: windword
This is such a non-issue!
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: queenofswords
and you still make this kind of argument
What kind of argument?
Do you disagree about the legality of Obama emailing someone on a private server? Did you know that it wasn't illegal for the Clinton's to use their own server? The catch is, they were supposed to have backed everything up on a .gov server, which they didn't. However, everything sent to a .gov address WOULD be backed up.
Apparently, it's a pretty big deal to the White House though because -- after all this time -- suddenly Obama is retracting his previous statement that he found out Hillary was using an email system outside of the U.S. government for official business "at the same time everybody else learned it through news reports."
originally posted by: underwerks
How does wanting to see evidence of something make me an apologist?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Apparently, it's a pretty big deal to the White House though because -- after all this time -- suddenly Obama is retracting his previous statement that he found out Hillary was using an email system outside of the U.S. government for official business "at the same time everybody else learned it through news reports."
It was never illegal!
What didn't happen, and what Obama could NOT have known, was that the the Clinton's private server data was NOT being backed up on a .gov server, which was required by law. That's on the IT guys. not on Hillary Clinton or Obama!
If you don't see anything wrong with that, I feel sorry for you.
and this bonehead of a POTUS doesn't stop to think, "Hey! I should make sure these communications are being backed up on a government server!"
originally posted by: windword
QOS wrote:
"and this bonehead of a POTUS doesn't stop to think, "Hey! I should make sure these communications are being backed up on a government server!"
You wrote:
"Nope. That's the last thing that should be on POTUS' mind. Please! That's up to the IT guys."
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: windword
This is such a non-issue!
Today, the WH press secretary announced that what he meant is that he “was not aware of the details of how that email address and that server had been set up.”
Link
I find it very interesting whenever the President has to revise a public statement he let stand for more than a year and a half without correction.
I'm old-school like that.
Obama is specifically asked about how this reflects on his claims to be the most transparent administration ever and he says, "The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency, which is why my emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived."