Huma terror ties exposed by Anonymous 10-25-2016

I guess everyone already knows all about Huma and her family
and their Saudi business? She needs to be interviewed re: top
secrets by the cia.

the expose that was uploaded this morning:
www.youtube.com...

You'll wanna expand that OP if you want ensure this thread remains.

Yeah! What IIB said. If we want to watch youtube videos we'd go to youtube.

Star nd Flag.

I have known about this for some time...but most people have no idea.
I hope this goes viral.

originally posted by: Drawsoho
I guess everyone already knows all about Huma and her family
and their Saudi business? She needs to be interviewed re: top
secrets by the cia.

link to the expose that was uploaded this morning:
www.youtube.com...

This has been known for a long time her involvenent was cleared by the FBI. There is nothing here bigger security threat was Anthony Weiner her husband. And I would be more worried about her incolvementioned with him but she is rectifying that mistake.

Being cleared by the FBI means very little if you are part of the global establishment. Not saying that the Vid is right or wrong, but using the FBI as a cover for innocence do not have much weight to it these days.

FBI, lol-corrupt at the top. I said CIA.
a reply to: dragonridr

CIA - FBI ...what difference, at this point does it make? Corruption has no boundaries.

Can the video be embedded (here) by somebody who knows what they're doing? so ATSer's can better see it and decide for themselves what to conclude.

a reply to: Drawsoho

originally posted by: Drawsoho
I guess everyone already knows all about Huma and her family
and their Saudi business? She needs to be interviewed re: top
secrets by the cia.

link to the expose that was uploaded this morning:
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: annabanana

what difference, at this point does it make?

Of all the times I've read and listened to people try and quote this, I think this is the second time I've seen someone got it verbatim since it was shrieked out of the squakbox we all know as HRC.

Aw...quit picking on poor Huma...She's going to be our next Secretary of State, donchaknow.

originally posted by: GraffikPleasure
a reply to: annabanana

what difference, at this point does it make?

Of all the times I've read and listened to people try and quote this, I think this is the second time I've seen someone got it verbatim since it was shrieked out of the squakbox we all know as HRC.

HaHa GraffikP
Thanks for noticing.
I can be sort of a stickler about that sort of thing. Sometimes. (When it matters.)

I'm glad the video got embedded. Thanks CynConcepts. Since it's fairly short (5 or so min) folks can have a quick lookie.
And I see it's now been added to the Original Post as well.
AB

This shows for anyone who can operate a web browser they can prove Hillary, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda all connected together by Huma and sharing all of our top secret most highly classified materials.

What an evil web Hillary is part of.

Now we can wonder anew why Bill lobbed cruise missiles at empty tents and never told us Al Qaeda declared war on the US. This position of the Clintons may extend further back than Huma's time.

I remember hearing that Huma has ties to Islamic terrorism, but I never actually looked into it. This video is simple enough and easy to see the links. I'm glad I took the time to watch, but I don't see how it helps us at all. Truly, we can know this and not be able to change a thing. I feel so helpless and this literally makes me nauseated. I can't imagine what our country, our world, will be like for my kids in years to come.

a reply to: Drawsoho

I also hope you have more sources than one YouTube video.

YouTube is hardly known to be a source of unassailable truth.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Drawsoho

I also hope you have more sources than one YouTube video.

YouTube is hardly known to be a source of unassailable truth.

That is certainly true. However, I believe all of what the video brings forth can be verified through independent research.
This is actually not new information brought to light. It's been out there for some time - just not been picked up by the MSN. No surprise there.

a reply to: annabanana

In threads dealing with current events, specifically ones which make a proposition which requires verifying data, it is upon the OP to provide sourcing material relevant to the subject matter, and the more important the issue, the more data is expected.

a reply to: TrueBrit


I agree with you there too, TrueBrit.

The more widely-sourced data, the better.

a reply to: Drawsoho

YouTube.

a reply to: Drawsoho

Exposed by Anonymous? No, it is some guy calling himself that.