It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Would Mrs. Clinton delivers on he threats and harsh rhetorics against Russia if she became President? Or will she correct her position against us?"
He then issued what sounded like a horrifying ultimatum to US politicians, saying: "Jeopardising Russian-American relations in order to gain brownie points internally – I consider this to be harmful and counter productive.
"It's not funny anymore. If somebody out there wants confrontation. This is not our choice but this means that there will be problems."
SOURCE
originally posted by: Profusion
"Would Mrs. Clinton delivers on he threats and harsh rhetorics against Russia if she became President? Or will she correct her position against us?"
He then issued what sounded like a horrifying ultimatum to US politicians, saying: "Jeopardising Russian-American relations in order to gain brownie points internally – I consider this to be harmful and counter productive.
"It's not funny anymore. If somebody out there wants confrontation. This is not our choice but this means that there will be problems."
SOURCE
I can already hear the cries of "it's more saber rattling." Let's review the definition of saber rattling:
"the display or threat of military force"
Putin is simply saying that he will defend Russia and its interests against Clinton. This is not saber rattling by definition.
Putin's statements above are exactly what I've been posting about here for weeks. Does it mean anything now that it's coming directly from the two most important people involved, Clinton and Putin? Does that have any meaning to the "it's more saber rattling" crowd?
So, Mrs Clinton has chosen to take up a very aggressive stance against our country, against Russia.
Mr Trump on the other hand calls for cooperation, at least when it comes to the international fight against terrorism
Naturally we welcome those who would like to cooperate with us and we consider it wrong that we always have to be in conflict with one another creating existential threats for each other and for the whole world.
As well as fail in delivering results in the international fight against terrorism
How will things be after the US elections, we don’t know would presidential candidate trump deliver on his views of cooperating with Russia? how far would he take those aspirations?
Would Mrs Clinton deliver on her threats and harsh rhetoric against Russia if she became president or will she correct her position against us?
We don’t know.
originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: Profusion
It is only natural that Putin wants to continue with a P***y like Obama and not have to take on this new one. Frankly, I doubt that the relationship between the two would suffer so much as bluster and posturing is the part of the game. But of course, Putin has his druthers and Trump wanting NATO and other "friends" to pay their way for protection is entirely an excellent idea. We're tired of holding the free world up.