WIkileaks Release 16

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Isn't Benenson the person WL just announced that they had a "surprise" for?

a reply to: IAMTAT

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Last night wikileaks tweeted they will be releasing a "surprise for Kaine & Brazile".

You knew, you just forgot, lol.

Outstanding thread Gentlemen !!!

Well done.

Buck

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: IAMTAT

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Last night wikileaks tweeted they will be releasing a "surprise for Kaine & Brazile".

You knew, you just forgot, lol.

Heh heh...TAT never forgets...

Wikileaks puts Clinton advisor Benenson on notice

thehill.com...

Wikileaks now has a tweet pinned for this release.

Love the gif they have for the tweet.



Hm, what activities could the CF be involved in that were 'more than just charitable activity?'

As you and I discussed Friday, we are still identifying activities hrc could be involved in once she leaves the State Department. We are presuming there will be a foundation piece but there are obviously other things and we are still in the early stages of that decision-making process. As cdm reminded me today, as there is a review going on about the nature of business that can take place on CF property, the outcome will presumably affect the nature of the office hrc will be able to have at CF. Since in the near term, we are talking about a small staff that could be handling potentially more than just charitable activity, we may have to be elsewhere. Plus we still have the logistical concern that her daily commute to water street will be challenging.

/emailid/26511

This is from the same email that was mentioned prior in the thread.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical
"cvc" (Chelsea Victoria Clinton) mentioned in the email...
I wonder if a medical facility falls under the heading of "more than just charitable activity".

originally posted by: Socrato
Could it be that Assange might turn himself in soon knowing that Trump is going to win and will then pardon him?

You may be right, Socrato. Hillary has said for years that she wants to kill Julian Assange, given the opportunity. Donald Trump is certainly his best hope for freedom...and for LIFE.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
"cvc" (Chelsea Victoria Clinton) mentioned in the email...
I wonder if a medical facility falls under the heading of "more than just charitable activity".

Or were they talking contributions that were not for charity?

a reply to: butcherguy

Always...but mentioning Chelsea brings it a little 'closer to home'...as she has been noted in Podesta emails as questioning some possible Clinton Foundation fundraising corruption. They like to keep that part away from her.

Edit:
BTW...How close is Chelsea's apt. (21 E.26 th. St.) to 77 Water Street?

a reply to: IAMTAT

BTW...How close is Chelsea's apt. (21 E.26 th. St.) to 77 Water Street?

Not too far:

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

LOL...about 4.5 mi. How convenient.

Here is a revelation, Clair McCaskill was in on a plot to discredit
the Inspector Generals Report....but how was she getting her information?

Wikileaks exposes plot toDiscredit Clinton Email Investigation
Emails show top Senate Democrat Claire McCaskill and Clinton camp
conspired to smear State Dept. watchdog...


www.lifezette.com...

a reply to: burntheships

Thanks for the post. McCaskill is my Senator. I'll spread the word here.

Is this fraud ?

Since the Clinton Foundation's taxable year is a calendar year that ends 12/31/11, I thought that you might want a portion of this total amount billed and paid this year. In that way, we and you could for optics purposes spread the billing and payment cycle over two Form 990 reporting years 2011 and 2012. For example, I could prepare and send you an invoice Monday for governance review services for half of the total which the Foundation could pay before 12/31 and then send a second bill in January 2012 for the remainder (and any new work you might ask us to do).

a reply to: Denoli

I am not an accountant, but I don't think that it is fraud.

Ok 👌

Thanks a reply to: butcherguy

I just saw this one come up on Twitter.... WikiLeaks ID #26336.
Apparently a Reuters 'journalist', Mark Hosenball, offered up a document to the Hillary people.

From: Date: Apr 21, 2015 5:38 PM Subject: RE: hello To: Cc: Please do. I put in a call to Kendall yesterday but they said he was out of town til Weds or Thurs. I would love to talk to one or both of them about this. Many tks for any encouragement you could offer to that end. Rgds mh *From:* John Podesta [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Tuesday, April 21, 2015 5:29 PM *To:* Hosenball, Mark J. (Reuters News) *Cc:* John Podesta *Subject:* Re: hello Mark, That's in a different lane with Kendall and Cheryl. Mind if I share this email with them? John On Apr 21, 2015 5:11 PM, wrote: I have run across a rather interesting document which outlines in detail the principal current objectives of the House Benghazi Committee, and was wondering if you might have a minute or two to discuss this. If you are anywhere near 1333 H in next day or two I might even show the document to you (I’m out on Thursday, however) though I am reluctant to hand out copies at this stage. It is a document which raises some questions about the bona fides of the committee’s investigation, rather than about anything specific a certain former SecState might have done. If this is something that you would not want to get involved in, if you had any alternative ideas as to who I ought to speak to I would welcome them. Hope all is well etc. All best & regards mh

He got hold of the list of objectives of the House Benghazi Committee and offered it up to Hillary.
Objective journalism?

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: digital01anarchy

I recall seeing conversations on the chans that revolved around the notion that Wikileaks being hacked was a CTR campaign designed to throw shade on WL.

it is. it's the only possible thing they can do about it.

Have you been in the just attachment files few interesting things 👍a reply to: jedi_hamster

I would disregard any of the new emails as not being valid at this point in time. Wikileaks has been acting strange in their twitter and website responses.

a reply to: digital01anarchy


I have had this fear myself. I would be very cautious about what is coming out right now. Until I see an image of Julian with today’s newspaper. I think everything now could be suspect. Our own government may have even been the ones pretending to be Julian the other day during the cyber -attacks telling everyone to stop attacking our internet. So sad...