James O'Keefe Deadmans Switch On: Hillary Will Be Implicated Monday Part III Project Veritas

a reply to: Steak

Hillarys look when she finds out she lost in a landslide to Trump

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Connector

That is my point. And now why do you provide a video about BO being born in Indonesia when your other posts say Kenya. See what I'm getting at......

Yes, I see your trying to create something to argue about,
and not much more.

Actually no. I hate to be blunt on the interwebs ' cause it comes across rude but, I'm pointing out your posts are contradictory. A normal person would have admitted their fault after it being pointed out. You doubled down. lol

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: proximo

Layers can be caused when using a scanning program that does OCR. Sections that are hand written especially will appear to be a layer. His birth certificate is authentic.

OCR is not used to scan a document and then retain it's original formatting. It's a post-process effect.

Nice try.

a reply to: Tempter
So, Trump lied?

a reply to: Steak

Reminds me of that Song Crazy Bitch by Buckcherry ....That Women Needs a Restraining Order....Yep

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Tempter
So, Trump lied?

So, Hillary lied?

I noticed you did not answer my question about that, but still want
to talk about Trump in this thread, but the subject here is speculating
about what kind of dirt someone has on Hillary and Donna.

a reply to: burntheships

Yes. Hillary lied.
As has every politician who ever lived.

Happy?

a reply to: Connector

Speaking bluntly, this thread is not about me,
if you have no speculation about the video
that could implicate Hillary Clinton, or a related
subject matter, perhaps you could create your
own thread bashing ATS members...like you did here.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Yes. Hillary lied.

So, what is more criminal in your book, lying about deleting
emails that were subpoenaed by Congressional oversight,
mishandling classified email, and etc etc. or a billionaires
tax returns under examination?

a reply to: burntheships

Criminal is criminal, I suppose.
And that would depend on the judgement of a court of law, no?

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Steak

Hillarys look when she finds out she lost in a landslide to Trump

And immediately after showing her real emotions, Hillary will keel over with a stroke. Only this time, no one will come to her aid, because her "friends" will have abandoned Hillary, just like Hillary abandons friends and colleagues, when they hit a rough patch in life.

a reply to: Phage

Comparing the two, Clinton violated several laws, even
the FBI director implied there would be consequences
if she were under his office, loss of security clearance,
loss of job, etc.

I don't see any evidence so far Trump has violated any
tax laws, do you?

a reply to: burntheships

I have seen no evidence being presented in a court of law in either case.

Until and unless that occurs what anyone thinks is moot.

Look. Guys and gals. The BC issue is a moot point. And I'm with you that it is suspicious. I'm probably one of the few that saw his BC on his original site, when it was a fake of his sisters certificate. I saw it myself and I know what I saw. Also, the BC that is "original" in Hawaii isn't. That's the computerized copy. The original, done in handwriting, isn't there, and it hasn't been shown. Those are points in favor of the 'conspiracy.'

Now here are some points that are not. Obama's Mama, Stanley, grew up less than 20 miles from me. She was less than 5 years older than me. I could have dated her kid sister if she had one. We both went to the University of Washington and studied anthropology. She was gone before I got there, but we studied under the same professors. We knew the same people. We traveled in the same circles. I know her type, what I would all a proto-feminist. She then moved to the University of Hawaii. The UW and U of H have strong ties. She became pregnant almost immediately. There is some valid speculation that Obama Sr was not the father. He 'took the fall' and coincidentally desperately needed to retain his student visa at the time. I'm guessing that is what happened.

Bu NO ONE in their RIGHT MIND back them would ever travel to Kenya to have a baby. Kenya back then was not in the least modern. It was still emerging from colonialism. Frankly, compared to a modern American hospital, like that found in Honolulu, Kenya was primitive. I'm convinced, having lived in that time at that place, that Obama was born in Hawaii. And I'm not a fan of Obama-at all. There is NO QUESTION that he had an American mother, and very likely he had an American father as well. That make him an American citizen.

Now, EVEN IF HE WAS, it no longer matters. With an American mother it's murky enough. Besides, after a childhood in Indonesia he grew up in Hawaii and is thoroughly indoctrinated in American life as you or me. In terms of "THE ARGUMENT" it is OVER. Do you get that? It's OVER. just as it is over for McCain, and it is over for Cruz. And it's not a question for Hillary, is it? Then why the hell are you still arguing it??

It's DONE. Put a fork in it. It's pedantry. Get over it. Find something else to argue about because you are simply wasting time and space arguing about that here and now.

a reply to: Phage

It seems that Benghazi hearings, while not a
being a "court of law" are a legal process, and in such
according to the House Oversight Committee Hillary
Clinton is thought to have perjured herself in the hearings.

That still hangs in the balance, ongoing past the election.

a reply to: burntheships

Until and unless that occurs what anyone thinks is moot.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Until and unless that occurs what anyone thinks is moot.

Not moot, people can still think it is criminal, which it could turn out to be.

oversight.house.gov...
oversight.house.gov...

a reply to: burntheships
Until and unless evidence is presented in a court of law, it is moot.

ETA: Impeachment is also an option, should she be elected.

a reply to: Phage

She could be held in Contempt of Congress,
without ever entering your "court of law".

Again, not moot at all.

According to John Podesta's emails, this is the
stuff of her nightmares.