It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chopper2017
The rubber bullets, which are used as a non-lethal alternative to standard bullets, are known to cause significant pain and result in haematomas where clotted blood swells within the tissues and bruises. So far, PAVA is used by some Police officers as Pepper spray and to my knowledge is not used in bullet form. There are hundreds of taser deployments every day, and in the huge majority of them the suspect will fall and be apprehended. But in a situation where n assailant is facing an officer and threatens deadly force, he may get to employ only one option before the suspect shoots. That’s why cops will usually go for their firearm in these situations. The cop is usually reacting to the threat offered by the adversary, and action is going to beat reaction in terms of elapsed time. Can we say that there needs to be solution in order to stop these questionable shootings and to put all argument to rest? It is easy to say that the right to due process is something that should be honored, but most people would fire if drawn upon. However in questionable circumstances wouldn’t be a solution for officers to set weapons for stun?
State impunity is at the root of the problem of police violence. The government has granted the police special consideration to use excessive violence to enforce the law and combat crime. We have expected this, and many have accepted this as our way of life in the post 9/11 era. However, it is not at all anti-law enforcement to say that some of what we are seeing being done by badly trained and corrupt police officers would be and could be considered criminal behavior if it were committed by the average citizen. This power to use deadly force at will for any reason has now given every police officer “qualified immunity.” So why is it so bad to ask if the other option is to set weapons for stun?
P.S. When AT&T merged with Time Warner, this sealed the deal to a certain kind of surveillance in Hillary's New World Globalization Order. WATCH WHAT COMES NEXT!
October 23, 2016
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: bluerabbit7788
Are you mad because Trump is the President of the United States and Russia will not be baited by the Obama Administrations criminal State Department, many who will be in prison or disappear when President Trump is inaugurated in January?
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: bluerabbit7788
Are you mad because Trump is the President of the United States and Russia will not be baited by the Obama Administrations criminal State Department, many who will be in prison or disappear when President Trump is inaugurated in January? Yea, you are mad that President Trump is going to be inaugurated and that Russia will not be bankrupt in April! Ha, it so easy to see when people are angry that President Trump will be inaugurated in January and that Russia will not be bankrupt in April.
LOL ROFL LMFAO!!! LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!LOL ROFL LMFAO!!!
why not?
I didn't dig too far into the geopolitics at the time.