It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But to try to drag this thread on for pages about news from days ago is trolling to push past this very spot with it.
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
It appears that Hillary supporters are not willing to go
to bat for her anylonger on these big hits, its easier
for them to post ad homs. They are probably napping
on the job, just like their "queen"
Look at this, really beyond the pale of disgusting.
John Podesta says this about why they are talking
about Niki Minaj's Bu**
Gender, and racial, and booty equity
Gender, and racial, and booty equity
Im not sure which release it is from, but John Podesta
was found saying really lewd remarks.
Really deserving of its own thread, my internet is wonked
so anyone feel free.
www.washingtontimes.com...
This is more proof that Clinton does not care about Women,
except to find a way to use them or capitalize on some
spin they can put on a story.
Disgusting!!
I instead think that the president will be inclined to appoint a highly qualified black woman to the Court who has been recently confirmed. In a previous post, I said that the most likely candidate is Attorney General Loretta Lynch. I continue to think her credentials are strong.
There is another potential sticking point – one on which people directly involved in Democratic Supreme Court nominations are torn.
The confirmation process would give Republicans the excuse to demand a wide array of documents that are related – maybe tangentially – to Lynch’s service as attorney general. These could include documents relating to decisions to initiate investigations and prosecutions. Benghazi is one example among many. In the view of some, that is a deal-breaker for the nomination. The administration won’t want to expose itself to those demands.
originally posted by: bknapple32
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I dont know what you arent getting at. Saw those. Im not surprised. And if you did that to Trump or any other politician, we will find all sorts of pay for play issues. Again- both sides. Thats the point. The alt right acts like the left has descended from hell. But their side of the lawn is pristine. What a joke.
This is on both sides. And that's why the general public DOESNT CARE ABOUT THESE EMAILS.
ETA: enjoy the loss on Nov 8 even with 10,000 more emails coming
Over the past several years, the groups, which include American Bridge 21st Century, Media Matters for America and the super PAC Ready for Hillary, have paid Ms. Bonner’s consulting firm in excess of $6 million to help them cultivate wealthy donors and raise money, according to tax filings and campaign disclosures.
Ms. Bonner’s contracts give her firm a commission, typically 12.5 percent, on any money she brings in. Her tenacity, ties to wealthy givers and mastery of making donors happy have made Ms. Bonner, 48, among the most successful practitioners of a trade that is virtually invisible to voters but has taken on immense power and influence in the post-Citizens United world.
Almost every candidate for high office must now court ultrarich donors to finance super PACs. And with each party more reliant than ever on networks of outside groups to supplement its advertising and opposition research, fund-raisers like Ms. Bonner hold the keys to the big-money kingdom. www.nytimes.com...