Trump used his foundation to fund guerrilla filmmaker James O’Keefe

a reply to: DrStevenBrule

Something tells me that if Hillary had funded O'Keefe instead of Donald funding him, then O'Keefe would have been just as willing to "expose" Trump. Yeah, I think it matters where the money is coming from.

a reply to: Swills

Hmm lets see if I can play this game.

"Trump is either in cahoots or incompetent. "

Lets try Hillary....

1.


2.


3.


I could go on, but you get the point.

Your all about deflecting issues, like what's the content of video's, or her own words.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I think you forgot to mention he used his charity to do it. Don't you guys get mad at the Clinton foundation for doing the same exact thing?

a reply to: Swills

"......but we all get she's better than Trump"

a reply to: Black_Fox

I totally get that defending Trump automatically means to deflect to Hillary is Trump supporting 101 but as much as I agree with you shes just terrible there's no way in hell I'm going to agree with you that we should give Trump the power of our military, to say the least.

Sorry, you guys had many options to vote as your nominee and you all chose a buffoon. I would have voted for Rand Paul in a heartbeat had you nominated him. And to be fair, good job Democrats for nominating Hillary Clinton. Seriously, what the hell man?

a reply to: Swills

Did the CF do something like that? I've been too busy exposing stuff like the Clinton's role in the last 30's year of involvement in driving the global drug trade, and in driving global jihad, to notice.

a reply to: Swills

Me?

Defend Trump?

Maybe you should look through my past posts.

I think they are both trash.

They are equally garbage.

And trying to find any angles to defend any of them isn't my thing.

I'm not voting, nor should anyone else.

Choosing the lesser of 2 evils, is still choosing evil.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: seeker1963

I understand your feelings on the source because it's exactly how I feel when anyone cites Fox News, Breitbart, The Gateway Pundit, Drudge Report, and even Alex Jones, for their thread. That said, the real source of this is Trump's own campaign. They gave the documents to the WaPa so instead of hating a left wing outlet let's look at the actual content and digest facts, not feelings.

I could twist your words and ask you the same thing as to why you refuse to digest the word of AJ or any other "right wing" outlet.

If you don't get it by now, you are lost. You are a Puritan that won't accept any other view or opinion other than the political church you belong to.

Ask and ye shall receive, although I really don't think you know what you are asking for by planting your feet in the ground.

a reply to: JacKatMtn

And when that doesn't happen, what then? Will Trump go on a rampage crying about the rigged system? Will he incite his supporters? Probably!!!

Trump is a wild card, and not in a good way. He's a spoiled brat who runs on pure emotions and he can't handle losing. The entire world is watching him, and mostly hating him, and if he doesn't win I fear his world will implode and he's not gonna go down quietly.

Just wait, I'm calling it now. Riots after Trump loses.

For $10,000 I'd say they stretched those dollars 50 times further than the CF ever could.

Is it illegal for charities to donate to non-profits?

Project Veritas is the most effective non-profit on the national scene, period.

We’ve had dozens of successes, many of which are detailed on this site. The pattern is clear:

Project Veritas launches an investigation with the placement of our undercover journalists. The rollout of our findings creates a growing and uncontainable firestorm of press coverage. Corruption is exposed, leaders resign, and organizations are shut down.

We get immediate, measurable and impactful results, and our return on investment is unparalleled.

Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization. Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues that are raised through its investigations, nor do we encourage others to do so. Our goal is to inform the public of wrongdoing and allow the public to make judgments on the issues. projectveritas.com...

Can you prove that PV wasn't already going to do that investigation, without the TF cash?

Since the story they broke is real, and that any kind of activities anything like that in this nation needs to be exposed, I'd say that was an admirable investment by TF.

a reply to: seeker1963

Well, we could play this back and forth game of who is who but are you asking me to listen to Alex Jones? Funny enough, I did once upon a time, back when I couldn't care less about politics. I was in it for the conspiracies and my rabbit hole was UFOs which eventually led me to Alex Jones. Not that he ever talks about such subjects but of course I stumbled upon the NWO Lizard people conspiracy. So I used to listen to Jones when I had the time and after a while I realized he didn't provide much substance. I was looking for news but instead I got hours of rambling, bad jokes, emotional outbursts, peen stroking, much doom porn, and many, many commercials about survival products.

I got bored and moved on. It took me awhile to realize he was a conservative, the pinnacle of what a right wing conspiracy theorist is. He didn't start out this way but it's where he is now.

So that's my Jones story but I couldn't listen to Rush Limbaugh or watch Fox News or read The Gateway Pundit if you paid me too because the amount of stupid and lies that come from those sources is too much for me to handle. We all are aware Fox News is an entertainment channel, right? Just because it says News doesn't mean it's news.

And you may be surprised to know I'm not a democrat and I don't subscribe to either party. I just don't agree with much of anything coming from the Trump camp and his supporters. Well, conservatives in general and it has nothing to do with some kind of blind party loyalty.

Are you loyal to your party? Kinda sounds like it to me.

originally posted by: seeker1963

Who the hell can make this kind of stuff up?

Anybody, a bit like that dodgey video you posted on another thread re CNN blacking out reporters and guests.

So Trump donated 10K to a film maker and Hillary armed both ISIS and the Mexican cartels.

Sure, let's act like the first part of that sentence is the important part.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I'm sure you have and yet here you are supporting a man who would do the same exact thing! Will you then investigate president Trump when he's busted for corruption? That's the question you should be asking yourself?

The Center for American Progress (CAP) is a progressive public policy research and advocacy organization. The first president and CEO was John Podesta

Source

Extra: CAP donor lists show many with Clinton ties

ThinkProgress is an American political news blog. It is a project of the Center for American Progress. ThinkProgress was founded in 2005 by editor Judd Legum, a lawyer.

Source

Clinton also got a boost from Judd Legum, the editor of ThinkProgress, who emailed Podesta several times with tips, using his personal email account.

Source

Judd Legum, founder and editor of the liberal ThinkProgress blog, repeatedly fed the Hillary Clinton campaign information about Bernie Sanders during the Democratic primary, hacked emails published by WikiLeaks reveal.

Source

I'm sure I could go on and on forever, but you get the point. So Donald Trump donated $10,000 to PVA. Neither Trump nor O'Keefe forced Zulema Rodriguez to take credit for violent protests in Chicago that forced Trump to cancel a March rally.

I would like to think years ago many here at ATS would be happy that corruption in politics is being exposed. It's sad that this is what ATS has become.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Well, I'm just an armchair warrior but I would love to see the Trump foundation under investigation.... oh wait! They are, right?

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: seeker1963

Well, we could play this back and forth game of who is who but are you asking me to listen to Alex Jones? Funny enough, I did once upon a time, back when I couldn't care less about politics. I was in it for the conspiracies and my rabbit hole was UFOs which eventually led me to Alex Jones. Not that he ever talks about such subjects but of course I stumbled upon the NWO Lizard people conspiracy. So I used to listen to Jones when I had the time and after a while I realized he didn't provide much substance. I was looking for news but instead I got hours of rambling, bad jokes, emotional outbursts, peen stroking, much doom porn, and many, many commercials about survival products.

I got bored and moved on. It took me awhile to realize he was a conservative, the pinnacle of what a right wing conspiracy theorist is. He didn't start out this way but it's where he is now.

So that's my Jones story but I couldn't listen to Rush Limbaugh or watch Fox News or read The Gateway Pundit if you paid me too because the amount of stupid and lies that come from those sources is too much for me to handle. We all are aware Fox News is an entertainment channel, right? Just because it says News doesn't mean it's news.

And you may be surprised to know I'm not a democrat and I don't subscribe to either party. I just don't agree with much of anything coming from the Trump camp and his supporters. Well, conservatives in general and it has nothing to do with some kind of blind party loyalty.

Are you loyal to your party? Kinda sounds like it to me.

I have been an Independent until Trump ran, which forced me to register as a Republican because of my states laws.

I vote on someone based upon their adherence to our Constitution PERIOD!

I am loyal to the Constitution and could give a damn about R or D!!!!

How about you?

a reply to: Swills

I'd wager most of the charities out there could use a good investigation, while it should be a mandate for those owned by POTUS contenders.

The things people from each side keep complaining about should already be a norm (i.e. campaign email become FOIA).

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: DrStevenBrule

Grasping at straws? It's literally in the documents he submitted to the WaPa! His documents! You can view them here!

www.washingtonpost.com...< br />

5/13/2015

PROJECT VERITAS

soo.oo
10,000.00

Come on Trump supporters, to deny this is truly embracing ignorance. Don't do that.

Seriously, calling me a Clinton shill? First of all, that's literally not allowed but more importantly if you knew me you would know I'm no Clinton shill. Feel free to visit my thread history.

WApo? The Inquirer has more respect these days. Oh, you are one of the S's. Rent due?

a reply to: Swills

He'll have a lot to live up to, and I will have very little patience if he doesn't.

I'll observe for maybe 6 months, we'll see, and unless he's standing up to the NWO kind of stuff, if he proves just to be another FAKE Change party hack agent like Obama, I'll be on him like black on outer space.

I actually tuned out during the Obama years, so he hardly even 'had to deal with' my usual cream the figurehead treatment post-election day. Poor Bush I made a sport out of beating the evil out of him every day, internet'ally speaking.