Project veritas part 1 Rigging the election

a reply to: daskakik

Alright Debbie downer. Maybe I should call the suicide prevention squad for you. You sound depressed? A Trump win might cheer you up.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

I'm not happy or sad about any of it. I'm just questioning how you came to the conclusions that you did when everything you mentioned is in opposition to those conclusions.

Trump winning would not cheer me up or bring me down. That would mean that I am hoping for one outcome or another. That isn't the case.

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
In this 1st undercover video release, Project Veritas reveals the workings of Democrat operatives, coordinating protests, scripts to incite violence at Trump/Pence events, explain the gray area of walking a legal fine line to insulate the DNC, Hillary campaign providing "plausible deniability", all the while keeping each other informed of their efforts... From shutting down the Trump rally in Chicago earlier this year, to having 500+ show up to disrupt a Trump event in DC, and shutting down a highway in Arizona, this report shows that there is nothing spontaneous about these events.. They are organized and coordinated.



THis just dropped.... watching it now... just sharing in case it's removed soon...


WARNING... Explicit Language!!!

www.youtube.com...

Thanks for the op.

I am like many that are gravitating more and more towards the idea that our election system is heavily manipulated, by media, pundits, campaign finance, etc.

I abhor Clinton (and Trump) and the level of corruption our system has reached, not to mention the endless wars and horrific foreign policies.

I'm a bit in a bind though, as a liberal. I work in let's just say a city government office for a major US city. All of the upper management, including my bosses, are functionally political appointees who all worked on the Obama campaign as well as various senatorial, governor, and mayoral campaigns. All democrat.

While interesting to have such exposure, this election cycle is realllllyyyy exposing their bias and how different I am from them. 95% of them are spouting the standard pro-HIllary propaganda, and castigating any of us who question the narrative or dare to even offer moderate, calm critiques. Even more horrific would be admitting to want to vote for let's say Jill Stein. Within my office, it would irreversibly affect someone's social standing and possibly behind the scenes job security if they were a Trump supporter. Literally not one person has admitted to that. At most 2-3 of us have had the courage to offer Clinton critiques, and that alone marks us for some colder treatment. Meanwhile, they invite some of us to fundraisers for Hillary or other candidates, which is actually possibly illegal or at least very unethical for upper mgmt to do. A number of the director level people have left for the Clinton Campaign. At work I literally have to get subjected daily to convos that sound like Hillary campaign sound bytes, and be shown videos and memes mocking everyone else.

It's really quite uncomfortable, and I'm questioning my job as a result.

I'm voting Waldo.


Watch "Black Mirror" on Netflix, episode 3 to see what I mean.

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
In this 1st undercover video release, Project Veritas reveals the workings of Democrat operatives, coordinating protests, scripts to incite violence at Trump/Pence events, explain the gray area of walking a legal fine line to insulate the DNC, Hillary campaign providing "plausible deniability", all the while keeping each other informed of their efforts... From shutting down the Trump rally in Chicago earlier this year, to having 500+ show up to disrupt a Trump event in DC, and shutting down a highway in Arizona, this report shows that there is nothing spontaneous about these events.. They are organized and coordinated.



THis just dropped.... watching it now... just sharing in case it's removed soon...



WARNING... Explicit Language!!!

www.youtube.com...

lol trump isnt gonna win.

he is a hillary plant.

trump ran to divide and polarize the republican party so hillary would win.

trump was buddy buddy with the clintons and soros before the election.


think of it like the ross perot effect.

ross perot ran so bill clinton would be elected president against poppa bush

trump will only get like 35-39 percent max.

look at utah, republicans are losing utah to an independent cuz of trump. utah has be republican for 52 years.

if you think trump is going to win, its delusional thinking.

Take the Red Pill Neo and see how deep the Rabbit hole goes.

I have thought this whole thing playing out in front of us could be a well orchestrated scam too. Do you have any evidence to support that theory? I'd be interested in reading it.

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
In this 1st undercover video release, Project Veritas reveals the workings of Democrat operatives, coordinating protests, scripts to incite violence at Trump/Pence events, explain the gray area of walking a legal fine line to insulate the DNC, Hillary campaign providing "plausible deniability", all the while keeping each other informed of their efforts... From shutting down the Trump rally in Chicago earlier this year, to having 500+ show up to disrupt a Trump event in DC, and shutting down a highway in Arizona, this report shows that there is nothing spontaneous about these events.. They are organized and coordinated.



THis just dropped.... watching it now... just sharing in case it's removed soon...



WARNING... Explicit Language!!!

www.youtube.com...

october surprise!

"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy, he's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." - Donald Trump

nymag.com...

In light of the access hollywood video and groping donalds got bigger problems.

On Dec 20 2016 donald has to be in court in Jane Doe Case involving alleged rape of a 13 year old girl with buddy billionaire and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein at a party at Epstein's Mansion with underaged girls.

www.buzzfeed.com...

www.dailywire.com...#

www.bluedotdaily.com...

In another deposition, Epstein’s brother Mark testified he once flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane with both him and Trump, who were “friends.” Asked why Trump was on board, Mark Epstein replied, “You’ll have to ask Donald."

www.documentcloud.org...

Without sounding too anatomically demeaning, we don’t think very much about the three pounds of gray matter that is encased in our skulls. We use it to think, but do we stop to think about why we think and why we accept certain things as truth? The truth as simple as it maybe, is that every day, our brains use a vastly simplified, symbolic model of reality and we store all of it in this relatively small space. Every day, we are forced to observe critically a world that has been said to be infinitely scaled and interpreted by science. This is a myth, because there are limitations that have been presented to us by science and there are even more limitations provided by religious dogma. Most people take for granted that science and even superstition give us a limited vision of what is contained in an unlimited and infinite universe. Truth formulations come from deep inside the core belief systems of everyone. We should at least attempt to form truth from objective observations. Sadly, it appears that critical thought and objectivity are being sacrificed for emotional decisions that are in some cases misguided and are quite simply, self-defeating. It appears the newly allowed arrogance of scientists claiming that science answers everything is a modern phenomenon. The idea that skepticism is another word for non-belief or active debunking defeats the true meaning of what science sets out to accomplish. It is unfortunate that science raises questions faster than it answers them and it does not lay claim to fundamental metaphysical concepts like truth, reality, or causation. Recently, we have discussed quantum entanglements, parallel universes, answers to paradox theories, timelines, theoretical dimensional travel and their applications towards theories about ghost appearances and extra-terrestrial encounters.

Advanced technology and its use most certainly is indistinguishable from magic and the paranormal and what it means to causal engineering has been and always will be a topic that for the most part. All things paranormal should be left up to analysis and anymore, the cause and effect cannot be easily defined. We do know that minds are powerful things and whether or not you see a paranormal world in front of you, it is becoming quite clear we must all take a bracketing approach to things like “truth” “reality” and “normalcy.” Disputes over the paranormal have literally gone from being challenged by science to being absorbed in the political agenda. Demanding disclosure of UFO’s for example has been seen as both a political and scientific debate. Now it seems it is more political or parapolitical and so the juxtaposition of the topics and the importance of both politically and scientifically gives me more reason to combine the political with the paranormal. Belief in the paranormal, especially when it ventures towards discussion about extra-terrestrial intelligence has been in the past political suicide. We have learned with the recent candid comments made by Donald Trump that the importance of talking points and language control when running for political office are paramount. When it comes to extra-terrestrials, many people in the military and those in political circles are now being more matter of fact about what is happening and it is surprising the mainstream media has avoided the discussion and once again, has neglected to point out that those in political circles are really itching to go public on issues of exobiology.

While speaking to a small crowed during a 2003 campaign event in New Castle, New Hampshire Democratic candidate and 4-Star General Wesley Clark opened up the dialogue about the UFO issue when he was asked by Jay Buckley, a space shuttle astronaut, what he envisioned for America’s space program. Clark replied “We need to look at the realms of applied and higher mathematics. I still believe in E = mc squared. But I can’t believe that in all of human history, we’ll never ever be able to go beyond the speed of light to reach where we want to go. I happen to believe that mankind can do it. I’ve argued with physicists about it. I’ve argued with best friends about it. I just have to believe it. It’s my only faith-based initiative.” Needless to say he was attacked by the media as a dreamer and he also was raked into the UFO believer crowd. Same thing happened with Dennis Kucinich. Kucinich spoke enthusiastically about a UFO Sighting during his run for the White House, “It was an unidentified flying object, OK? It’s, like, it’s unidentified,” Kucinich said during one of the few highlights at the Democratic presidential debate in Philadelphia. “I saw something.” Kucinich, whose UFO sighting came to light in a passage from Shirley MacLaine’s book, went on to joke that he planned to move his campaign office to Roswell, New Mexico. His candid talk about UFO’s proved to be a disastrous move. Now when you ask people about Dennis Kucinich the reply is, Dennis who?

Recently, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and even Hillary Clinton have not ruled out the possibility that extra-terrestrial and UFO phenomena need a second look. They have both jokingly and sincerely answered questions of talk show hosts and voters that have had the intestinal fortitude to ask that once taboo question of “Are we alone and what do you know about Roswell, Area 51, Aliens and UFO’s? John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign Chairman was a guest on CNN’s “The Lead,” with Jake Tapper to talk aliens and how Hillary Clinton wants to disclose the alien truth and open the files on Area 51. Podesta has made his interest in the possibility of alien life and conspiratorial leanings toward Area 51 well known, during his time serving in the Obama administration. The plot thickens and it must be said that the covert communications between world governments, the Vatican, military, astronauts, politicians and John Podesta has now been leaked to the public by none other the notorious WikiLeaks organization. during the second presidential debate, Donald Trump focused his attacks against Hillary on what the WikiLeaks files had to say about Clinton’s Wall Street speeches.

But the juicy emails are the ones that Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta was sending out , that had to do with extra-terrestrial reality, secret space programs, alien energy sources and Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell. In an email from January of that year, Mitchell asked for an urgent meeting with Podesta about “disclosure and zero point energy,” and promised that a colleague named Terri Mansfield would “bring us up to date on the Vatican’s awareness of extra-terrestrial intelligence. Edgar Mitchell sent this to Podesta:

“Remember, our nonviolent ETI from the contiguous universe are helping us bring zero point energy to Earth,” Podesta was told. “They will not tolerate any forms of military violence on Earth or in space.”

Apparrently the email, in which Edgar Mitchell and John Podesta appear to be on first name terms, reveals that both of them were intending to have a conversation via Skype, about the potential for war breaking out in space. Edgar Mitchell, who worked on the Treaty on the Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space, wrote: “We’re arguably closer than ever to war in space. Most satellites orbiting Earth belong to the US, China and Russia. And recent tests of anti-satellite weapons don’t exactly ease the scare factor. “It sounds like science fiction, but the potential for real-life star wars is real enough.” He included links in the email to several online articles on the possibility of war in space pooled from various sources. Mitchell said Deputy Defense Secretary, Robert O. Work spoke to Congress about space war last summer and President Barack Obama requested $5 billion for space defense in the 2016. Hot on the heels of this e-mail leak, 18 UFO data files are expected to be released in The United Kingdom. Some investigators claim the files could provide key evidence of extra-terrestrial life visiting the UK and of specific information about famous controversial sightings such as the Rendlesham Forest incident – a series of reported sightings by military officers of unexplained lights and the alleged landing of one or more craft in Suffolk in late December 1980. Although the files are being released to the National Archives, it is not yet clear when they will be available for public inspection.

Meanwhile the leaked emails about Mitchell and Podesta have been wildly speculated about however it has to be pointed out that Mitchell never met with Clinton or with Podesta, for that matter. Mitchell passed away last February at the age of 86, one day before the 45th anniversary of his Moon landing. Two other emails in WikiLeaks’ Podesta file were sent by Tom DeLonge, of the rock band Blink-182. Those emails refer to a UFO-related documentary project he had hoped to kick off this year. In an email from last October, DeLonge told Podesta that he’s “the one who interviewed you for that special documentary,” relating to “our sensitive topic.” In the other email, sent this January, DeLonge referred to Air Force Major General William McCasland in connection with the 1947 Roswell UFO incident. Julian Assange, has said many times that there have been many government leaks concerning UFO’s and that the discussion is not at all taboo for those in power. We can’t necessarily say that all of the cables are truthful and we can acknowledge most are sensational fodder to obsess over, however, the very presence of references to UFOs and a secret space program preparing for war confirm what has been reported on this show and many others like it. You have to concede that it surely adds just a little bit of credence to those arguing that we are closer than we think to the wider universe and its inhabitants. The question is, are these documents and leaks game changers in the attitudes of skeptics that have earlier derided those who believe there are extra-terrestrials out there and that they may or may not be contributing to the welfare of this planet?

Do these documents implicate a government a cover-up? Many will say that yes, there is an obvious cover up and these documents show there is concern about what is happening in space. Everyone is awaiting the final word from the government as to whether or not aliens are real and why there is so much secrecy on the matter. It needs to be said that if you judge the actions of your government on such matters, the truth is not out there, it is in plain sight. We explore space, we devote computer bandwidth to try and locate signals from other worlds. You may not believe in aliens, but it is evident that space agencies around the world do and the United States military, NASA and other black ops organizations have sensitive information that they have kept from the American people regarding strange anomalous activities in space. It is getting to the point where NASA is no longer capable of keeping everything “top secret.” Some things cannot easily be explained by science. Meanwhile, the vigilant are waiting for that big moment when the smoking gun is found and the mainstream media decides to stop using politics as a crutch and report something which opens our eyes to a future that will be both thrilling and mysterious. Check out latest New World Globalization Order News: www.davidicke.com...

October 25, 2016

originally posted by: matafuchs
There is a LOT of locker room talk going on here...

Anyone who is still saying that the DNC and HIllary are not controlling this election is either deluded, mentally challenged or both.

and this is not creative editing just like ACORN was not.

It wasnt lockeroom talk, donald trump literally was being honest.

Trump had to say about Epstein, in 2002:

I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it, Jeffrey enjoys his social life.

www.buzzfeed.com...

www.dailywire.com...

www.bluedotdaily.com...

exerpt of a sworn testimony

On the fourth incident, she says Mr. Trump tied her to a bed and forcibly raped her, in a “savage sexual attack,” while she pleaded with him to stop. She says Mr. Trump violently struck her in the face. She says that afterward, if she ever revealed what he had done, Mr. Trump threatened that she and her family would be “physically harmed if not killed.” She says she has been in fear of him ever since.

In another deposition, Epstein’s brother Mark testified he once flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane with both him and Trump, who were “friends.” Asked why Trump was on board, Mark Epstein replied, “You’ll have to ask Donald."

www.documentcloud.org...

How did you get so far off the topic of Veritas and rigging the election, which is what this thread is about!?

How can anyone come on here and claim there is no rigging by the media and the criminal DNC operatives nd their supporters? People need to GO TO JAIL!

Exhibit A

a reply to: thepixelpusher
I hope they all have an appointment with a judge!!!! This is disgusting!!!!

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: thepixelpusher
I hope they all have an appointment with a judge!!!! This is disgusting!!!!

You disgusted with the video yeah? Of Russians.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
How can anyone come on here and claim there is no rigging by the media and the criminal DNC operatives nd their supporters? People need to GO TO JAIL!

Exhibit A

Exhibit B

You fancy fact checking that video? Looks like Russia.

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
How can anyone come on here and claim there is no rigging by the media and the criminal DNC operatives nd their supporters? People need to GO TO JAIL!

Exhibit A

You fancy fact checking that video? Looks like Russia.

As far as I can tell Hillary on Newsweek doesn't look like Putin. Curious that you are silent on that. Go ahead and call Newsweek and they'll tell you it's real and out on stands now.

Since the video is in question, I'll remove it. Newsweek magazine still proves my point of media rigging it for Hillary through their influence.

Investigations underway in PA... Democrat field office raided by police.

www.philly.com...