Project veritas part 1 Rigging the election

HIllary is center right, corporate/warhawk at best.

Anyone who doesn't know that isn't paying much attention.

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

ummm, No, that's why peaceful revolution will NEVER work...

Jaden

Do you really think some kind of violent revolution will work? Hell no. First, they control virtually all major media. By this fact alone you will not get the popular and massive uprising you would need. Secondly, they have FAR FAR FAR more advanced weaponry than you will ever have.

You think the military will fire on it's own people?

They can't even crush 30,000 people in isis with using war planes and artillery and 30 other nations!

What makes you think they will defeat or even fight their own family members and citizens that would number in the 100's of thousands if not millions?

DC would fall in 3 days.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You seem to have some knowledge on James O'keefe. Do you have any evidence to discredit his work up till now? I've never heard of him before.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I respect your post, but when challenged expect more digging to be done, to have a reply if it is out there.
And this did it for me, case closed.

FEC RECORDS



Busted !

Basic information on the guy responsible for the video in the OP (if anyone is interested in actual critical though, rather than bandwagoning):

James O'Keefe's October Surprise Shows He's Still A Hack, Not A Journalist

Not a bad short history of Mr. O'Keefes ... work.

STING OF MYSELF
Amateurish spies like James O’Keefe III attempt to sway the 2016 campaign.(The New Yorker)

Colorado Dems: We Caught James O'Keefe and His Friends Trying to Bait Us Into Approving Voter Fraud

... and so on.

And so many of you, here, have simply watched this video and didn't give a second thought to the fact that Mr. O'Keefe is ALSO a POLITICAL OPERATIVE WITH AN AGENDA.

LOL, and then you have the temerity to huff about "credibility."

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Gryphon66

You seem to have some knowledge on James O'keefe. Do you have any evidence to discredit his work up till now? I've never heard of him before.

See above.

originally posted by: notquiteright

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Rosinitiate

Is there anything illegal about what he states in the video?

You're joking right? "He is the double blind between the Campaign and the DNC"....He is virtually the "pony express for them".

He facilitates trained agitators to incite a crazy person, thereby creating a negative and misleading view of the Trump campaign.

Wikileaks has already shown that much if not most of the media is cahooting with Clinton. The FBI, State Department, DoJ, Clinton Campaign, DNC, Clinton Foundation are all in on it together. Trump was a plant to make for an easy victory.

There are serious forces at work trying to bring this to light. Look up, the sun is shining.

And so I'll ask again...are any of those things illegal?

He is the double blind between that is what the law demands. He isn't breaking the law, he is just saying this is how they have to do it because of the law. So in fact, all he is admitting is that they are following the law.

There is nothing illegal about training protesters and there is nothing illegal about a media outlet to support a specific candidate.

So please, tell me what is illegal about any of this?

Whether it is legal or not isn't really the issue. It is deceitful and manipulative. Why are you trying so hard to defend that kind of behavior?

And he is showing just how stupid the left's supporters are.

They are manipulating them and they don't know it.

If hillary wins, we will be getting a party rule, she doesn't call ANY shots that I can see.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Yah. We need a lone wolf who everyone in Congress refuses to deal with!

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

The libertariamism I 'grew up on' (I'm actually the same age as you) a decade ago (Badnarikian / Paulian), the neocon's hated us for the foreign policy stuff especially, liberals liked us for the foreign policy stuff especially. We bridged the gap on all the other stuff, but it made both sides uneasy.

Today we're probably the best in terms of being 'naturally equipped' to counter this SJW identity stuff, as to us ideologically its insane (but they call us racists anyways).

I'm seeing the same old neocon/neoliberal foreign policy stuff, and the 'new liberals' defending it just the same as the republicans used to defend it during Dubya.

The one thing I figured, it helped me sleep, was at least the "marginalized" groups would get all their equal rights utopia stuff and they'll finally be done arguing about all that stuff. But they're even more pissed than ever.

Hate to break it to you folks, but Hillary's Modern 'Liberalism' is already proving to be the worst thing that ever happened to America. This power structure of hers, that has her redefining "liberalism" to mean having the liberty to trample over everything in Her path, she didn't only 'just now' acquire this thing when she threw in her hat for this election. The 2 Party system, the power strangle hold of the Bush + Clinton Crime Cartel over this nation, over the many cultures of this earth, its all exposed now. Just in the past 2 weeks!

That's just my take on what's been going on. Please nobody try to derail / make it the course of the thread.

Right, and this part of the thing too. Many mainline democrats, including Clinton, aren't really *real* liberals or progressives. This election completely underlines this fact. The real leftists and progressives not only are against the corruption, but also are anti-war and anti-mutinational corporate greed (neo-liberalism in part).

Hillary Clinton does NOT represent real progressive values! Those would be more like Jill Stein, or somewhat Sanders.

As you note, on the foreign policy issues and corruption we find brotherhood with many "woke" libertarians, and some other conservatives.

But as you say, I don't want to take away from the actual thread.

Cheers brotha!

originally posted by: Gryphon66
HIllary is center right, corporate/warhawk at best.

Anyone who doesn't know that isn't paying much attention.

Agree 100%. She is not a real progressive. Neo-imperialism and neo-liberal economic policies are right wing policies.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Good catch, ty. I'll check those out.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Yah. We need a lone wolf who everyone in Congress refuses to deal with!

No what we need is a warhawk who isn't afraid of instigating WWIII. Now that is someone congress can fully support while they join in the beating of the war drums.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

RE Your Link: beta.fec.gov... 016

Help me out here... This Zulema Rodriguez received a $17,500 "Consulting Fee". WTF did she do to deserve $17.5k, and where did the money come from? The website doesn't indicate the source of the funds. It had better not be from the Government (my tax dollars)!

I wonder if the RNC knows about this video... what about the electoral commission?

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: Gryphon66
HIllary is center right, corporate/warhawk at best.

Anyone who doesn't know that isn't paying much attention.

Agree 100%. She is not a real progressive. Neo-imperialism and neo-liberal economic policies are right wing policies.

Well, I'd say authoritarian policies ... but in reality, that's the same thing.

originally posted by: Nucleardoom

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Yah. We need a lone wolf who everyone in Congress refuses to deal with!

No what we need is a warhawk who isn't afraid of instigating WWIII. Now there is someone congress can rally the war cry around.

Hey, how DARE you criticize a woman for "playing the big boy game" to get into power in Washington! The patriarchy made war and therefore it's sexist to blame her for wanting more war!!

Also, she is the most qualified, w̶a̶r̶-̶m̶o̶n̶g̶e̶r̶ empowered woman ever for office!

originally posted by: ATSAlex
I wonder if the RNC knows about this video... what about the electoral commission?

It might help if Mr. O'Keefe weren't known for creating carefully crafted frauds.

Why don't you take a proactive step, however, and send an email to the Federal Election Commission ... here's a link:

FEC

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Yah. We need a lone wolf who everyone in Congress refuses to deal with!

Over a pure corrupt crony that embraces both ideological & political Nazism, absolutely. The perpetual flow towards the federal government dictatorship, could use a halt. For starters. That's exactly what we need.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

originally posted by: Gryphon66
HIllary is center right, corporate/warhawk at best.

Anyone who doesn't know that isn't paying much attention.

Agree 100%. She is not a real progressive. Neo-imperialism and neo-liberal economic policies are right wing policies.

Well, I'd say authoritarian policies ... but in reality, that's the same thing.

Well yes, authoritarianism is also associated classically too with right wing.

a reply to: carewemust

This Zulema Rodriguez received a $17,500 "Consulting Fee". WTF did she do to deserve $17.5k, and where did the money come from?

Don't you know, she helped organize the Chicago riot to stop the Trump event, looks like she got well paid for doing that too. Fed through an Ohio super pac to hide the trail for her work somewhere else. But she outed herself in the video, because she was so proud of her accomplishments.