It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: dragonridr
Thanks for the info, it is appreciated.
However:
This isn't a freedom of speech thing this has to do with a judgement against Russia for 50 billion.
The synchronicity of this is astounding and I personally don't believe that the reason is for the money. The excuse, maybe...
Synchronicity of what? Because a number of Foreign secretaries have been holding a conference on the Syrian situation in London? So what?
The National Westminster Bank has informed RT UK that it will no longer have the broadcaster among its clients. The bank provided no explanation for the decision. “We have recently undertaken a review of your banking arrangements with us and reached the conclusion that we will no longer provide these facilities,” NatWest said in a letter to RT’s London office.
The bank said that the entire Royal Bank of Scotland Group, of which NatWest is part, would refuse to service RT. The letter said the decision was final and that it is “not prepared to enter into any discussion in relation to it.”
originally posted by: superluminal11
a reply to: Jonjonj
Looks like RT hit a nerve This is actually good news.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: dragonridr
Thanks for the info, it is appreciated.
However:
This isn't a freedom of speech thing this has to do with a judgement against Russia for 50 billion.
The synchronicity of this is astounding and I personally don't believe that the reason is for the money. The excuse, maybe...
Synchronicity of what? Because a number of Foreign secretaries have been holding a conference on the Syrian situation in London? So what?
You should probably just go back to sleep if all you have are stupid questions. Either get informed on events of the last 24 hours or ask somebody else, I am not your personal information slave.
"We have recently undertaken a review of your banking arrangements with us and reached the conclusion that we will no longer provide these facilities."
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Jonjonj
Often, RT has good news. Other times, not so much. One of their anchors quit on air do to the strict controls.
The collapse of the latest round of talks between Santander and RBS over the purchase of W&G shouldn’t come as a surprise.
...
Having regrouped and with capital markets improving somewhat, a year later, in 2013, RBS decided to take a different tack.
It chose to sell a future stake of no more than 49pc in W&G – it was at this point the brand was revived – to a group led by the Church Commissioners and Lord Jacob Rothschild’s RIT Capital Partners, in return for an upfront £600m and £200m later.
...
In May it emerged that RBS was going to scrap plans to spin off the bank, and instead resurrected plans for a trade sale to a rival – re-enter Santander – at the same time admitting there was a real risk of not making the December 2017 deadline for disposal set by the European Commission (the original deadline was actually December 2013).