Breaking!!! Assange Internet has been disabled by state attack!

a reply to: DBCowboy

I'm not defending the murderer both these people committed crimes. Separate in action and degree of law but they are both guilty of crimes.
Now no more of this stupid conversation. You fail when you attempt to put words in my mouth.

a reply to: Sillyolme

The truth is paramount.

Our government is corrupt.


You've picked your side.

I've decided to opt for truth and transparency instead.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Where's the real option where she simply didn't break any laws?

You know as has been determined by the FBI and the DOJ???

They never determined that she didn't break the law.

They simply determined not to indict her.

a reply to: DBCowboy

The side I picked knows what she's doing. It's as simple as that.

Sorry to break up the who is better debate..Have y'all seen this thread yet??

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This has everything to do with this thread! It's about.Assange hacking and or encryption codes and not about this off topic debate about Hillary and Donald or.who is better.smh!!! It relates!!!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
POST REMOVED BY STAFF.

It's quite the contrary to being "ok".

The laws she broke would have put any regular serviceman/servicewoman in Leavenworth.

It's that glaring double standard that has so many people outraged at the situation.

Hillary is about to be our next Commander in Chief... of the military; where everyone with a TS SAP clearance level is still trying to pick their jaws up off the floor from the fact that she was able to break those laws with no indictment.

She went full-blown Regan with "I don't recall...I don't recall...I don't recall...I don't recall...".

Her own statements highlight serious short-term memory loss issues and valid medical concerns (especially for someone who is likely headed towards the oval office), and that's giving her the benefit of the doubt because the only other option is that she was straight out lying under oath.

a reply to: imjack

She accidentally set up a government information system/email server in her home in order to bypass the well established protections in place. It was like she opened the door.
Imagine I am the manager of a bank branch. I leave the door and safe open and go to lunch. When I return, the gold/cash are missing. It is not my fault the thieves took everything. I didn't know there were bad people, I thought everyone was honest. I should not only keep my job, I am asking to be promoted to bank president. It was not my intent to have my customer's valuables taken.

In Clinton's case, what was the purpose in having the the email system totally in her control? She could/should have used existing systems where classified information is segregated and protected.Was she hiding something while doing official State Department business? Were there rules she didn't agree with? For instance, if I were to plug a thumbdrive into MY govt laptop, I would be quickly fired from my job, plus loose my TS clearance.(A thumbdrive introduced the melissa virus into the pentagon network)

She did not intend to give information to hackers, but clearly there was intent to break the rules, and open the door to all kinds of bad things.

Breaking!!! Assange Internet has been disabled by state attack!

Please post to the topic.
There's other threads for the comments about Hillary, etal...please go there if you want to discuss those topic.

You are responsible for your own posts.



and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

Just spotted this via gab.ai

a reply to: UKTruth

I got a friend in london who just shared a story about Assange being hauled away by British authorities.

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: UKTruth

I got a friend in london who just shared a story about Assange being hauled away by British authorities.

Looks like they have him - he'll be in the US tomorrow I suspect - or dead.

a reply to: imjackhillary put classified data on her private server so it could go out to the people see was selling it too after they made a big payment to clintom money launders i meant clinton foundation . the quote of hers i loved was when she said none of her emails were hacked after they had been showing up for several months after being hacked.

a reply to: UKTruth

I'm guessing he'll "commit suicide".

a reply to: projectvxn

After which the powers that be will conveniently "find" "evidence" that he was a prolific child abuser and a paid agent of the FSB.

Kill the man, smear his name. Standard practice.

I can't substantiate any claims of him being arrested or anything. Several basic google searches. Although Pam Anderson recently bought him a nice Vegan Lunch! Let me keep digging around.

a reply to: proteus33

the quote of hers i loved was when she said none of her emails were hacked after they had been showing up for several months after being hacked.

Do you a source for that.

As for as I know there is absolutely no evidence Clinton's server was ever hacked. These leaks, as I understand it, are coming from hacked government agencies and government employees, DNC employees and their intercommunications and the emails that FBI recovered from the Clinton server.

What???!! He's been captured or killed?

What the hell is going on?!!!!

Is there a trustworthy source?