CONFIRMED - Hillary Clinton Has Chronic Health Problems. Campaign Cover-Up is Ongoing.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Greggers

And there is another email chain from July 2015 that is entirely about rolling out the "narrative" concerning Hillary's personal tax records and her health.

Her doctor's letter is also discussed within.

Email ID: 11277

Subject line: "RE: Taxes/health records rollout"

Thanks for sharing. I went and read that. I found this, which makes it clear that taxes and health both pertain to Hillary's personal situation. But it also shows she released her full medical records and made a big deal out of it politically, to "get in front of it," so to speak:

From Wikileaks:


At 1 PM: Pitch the first round of stories to the travelling press corps (AP, Politico, WSJ, WaPo, etc) with a 2 pm embargo. For these stories, we will:

• Provide the full text of HRC’s physician’s letter, summarizing that she is in excellent health and is medically fit to perform the duties of President. We will push that she is the FIRST presidential candidate to release this info.

• We expect the stories that pop at 2 pm to have headlines such as “CLINTON IN ‘EXCELLENT HEALTH,’ MEDICAL RECORDS SAY” … “CLINTON RELEASES HEALTH REPORT” ... "CLINTON CAMP AIMS TO ONE-UP BUSH IN DISCLOSING FINANCES". The lede of most of these stories will be the health records since they are being released in full, but the lower paragraphs of the stories will focus on how the campaign says it will improve upon Jeb Bush’s level of disclosure when the tax returns emerge.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

We both know dear that the videos were not showing her having seizures. If you keep insisting that they do you're not doing yourself any favors.

Did I say that there are videos showing Hillary having seizures? I've seen some of her being assisted up stairs, falling flat on her face in her jet, passing out on the curb in NYC, coughing till not being able to speak, and other strange items. Seizures? Perhaps.

Doing myself favors? Come on. This isn't about you, OR ME. It's about doing what's best for the United States of America.

originally posted by: flice
BUT they do in fact say that her health is a sensitive issue. Now why would they even mention that?

Because they feel the public's perception of her health is a critical campaign issue, that's why.

So they wanted to be pro-active on that topic.

I suggest that HRC is being 'medically-treated' in a similar way that Adolph Hitler was back during the Nazi conquest era...

...Substances administered to Hitler[edit]---> Wikipedia excerpt

a reply to: Greggers
What we are reading here is the decided 'narrative."

Going back earlier, there was clearly a meeting on how to build the narrative, in March. On the itinerary was this:

2. Health

- What exactly do we want in a summary
- How do we want to set expectations?

Email ID: 11162

Again, nothing too telling about her health-specifics, however I think it's fair to say that what went into the summary was 'decided,' and the doctor's letter cannot be assumed to be her 'full medical records.'

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Greggers
What we are reading here is the decided 'narrative."

Going back earlier, there was clearly a meeting on how to build the narrative, in March. On the itinerary was this:

2. Health

- What exactly do we want in a summary
- How do we want to set expectations?

Email ID: 11162

Again, nothing too telling about her health-specifics, however I think it's fair to say that what went into the summary was 'decided,' and the doctor's letter cannot be assumed to be her 'full medical records.'

That's a fair point. A doctor's letter isn't a "full medical record" even if it's 100% true, and with the number of doctors we've seen on the take for celebrities and such, I wouldn't necessarily take any doctor's letter at face value. However, what's telling to me is that we don't see any "smoking gun" related to her health.

Nowhere in all those emails do we see anything about seizures, controlling the media if she needs medical attention, or anything like that. These were private emails. And no smoking gun.

All we see are strategy conversations about advancing the campaign's position on the subject.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

Me2---I knew I liked that guy for some reason- What a badass

Also, if history is any indication, attacking a candidate's health is not very effective.

LBJ dug up JFK's medical records and exposed that he had Addison's disease. JFK denied it (lied) and went on to win the primary against him anyway (although he chose LBJ as his running mate because he knew he needed Texas to win in the GE.)

Just thought I might throw that out there. Hillary's health is probably not an effective line of attack.

a reply to: carewemust

Forget her health problems, she has Mental Problems which are far more dangerous.

a reply to: Greggers

I get the sense from reading many wikileaks emails, over the last several months, that people met in person or spoke on the phone if they wanted to have a candid discussion about most topics.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
So what?

Trump is a “brave soldier” for avoiding STDs during his single years in the late ’90s.

Don't vote for any of them both! Go out and vote third party!

I dont suppose you can show me where in the OP there is a recomendation of a vote for Trump ?

Why do you people continually assume that not voting for Hillary automatically is a vote for Trump ?

I'd say take it one step further where the true freedom awaits- Don't vote for Trump Hillary or Third Party---They are all equally infiltrated by the $nake Cult. Unfortunately they have everyone efficiently divided and conquered so you could not get that many sheep to agree on 1 simple thing and coordinate effectively. I say get in there and get you 12 more years of the same to effectively hit your bottoms. Many are still enjoying their bottoms.

Do Trump supporters even remember what facts actually look like? Here we have again a giant leap conclusion based on extremely thin material. I can just imagine how popular Trump News will be. Zero facts but constant leaping to conclusions in the direction that suits them.

Just stop being so dumb about everything. Please.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
Do Trump supporters even remember what facts actually look like? Here we have again a giant leap conclusion based on extremely thin material.

Our "thin material" is still a few notches above CNN, ABC, MSNBC and NBC in the integrity department, LOL.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

So what? Really? She could be in power you fool. Thats what.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Greggers

I get the sense from reading many wikileaks emails, over the last several months, that people met in person or spoke on the phone if they wanted to have a candid discussion about most topics.

^^^This^^^

You can see that many of the emails are carryover from phone conversations and that the fact of Hillary's emails that were released through various means has affected what they communicate via the electronic (and hence traceable) means.

Logical deduction is necessary to determine, in many cases, what the intent in any particular email might be.

In the cases where the intent is cut and dry, Hillary's supporters pull one of these:


It would be laughable except for the fact of what the fallout of her being in office will be.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
Do Trump supporters even remember what facts actually look like? Here we have again a giant leap conclusion based on extremely thin material.

Our "thin material" is still a few notches above CNN, ABC, MSNBC and NBC in the integrity department, LOL.

Unfortunately, it's not. It's entirely speculative.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Greggers

I get the sense from reading many wikileaks emails, over the last several months, that people met in person or spoke on the phone if they wanted to have a candid discussion about most topics.

That may be true, in which case it would explain why there is no smoking gun in these emails. Now if we could just get the alt-right news to stop pretending they had found a smoking gun.

There are a few damning leaks... this isn't one of them.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
So what?

SO WHAT? Hillary's Doctor LIED! She is not in good health.

Her health seems fine.

It sure does.....

Hillary Clinton sick 9/11: Hillary collapses on September 11th, 2016

And how many "medications" does she need?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
Do Trump supporters even remember what facts actually look like? Here we have again a giant leap conclusion based on extremely thin material.

Our "thin material" is still a few notches above CNN, ABC, MSNBC and NBC in the integrity department, LOL.

No, not even close. This "thin material" is a few notches below tabloid. Even comparing it to tabloid gives it too much validation.

a reply to: Greggers

" Thanks for sharing. I went and read that. I found this, which makes it clear that taxes and health both pertain to Hillary's personal situation. But it also shows she released her full medical records and made a big deal out of it politically, to "get in front of it," so to speak: "

Deny Ignorance . You are Deluded in thinking Hillary Clinton does not have Serious Health Issues . The Fact she and her Campaign Minions are trying Desperately to Hide them says a lot about her Suspect Character .












" Hillary Clinton’s health issues are drastically worse than she has revealed publicly — and the potential presidential candidate tried to keep her medical information private for fear that it would damage her bid for the White House in 2016, according to a new book.

The 66-year-old (ERROR - 68 Year Old ) former secretary of state has suffered more fainting spells than publicly known, is prone to have blood clots, and may be at serious risk of a stroke, according to the book, “Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Obamas,” by Edward Klein.

Modal TriggerThe medical scare that forced Clinton to be rushed to New York-Presby­terian Hospital on Dec. 30, 2013, revealed how serious the situation is.


“She has to be carefully monitored for the rest of her life,” doctors warned former President Bill Clinton before Hillary was released from the hospital, according to the book.

The book claims Hillary was taken to New York­Presbyterian after a fainting spell and concussion that she suffered in her seventh-floor office at the State Department — not at her home, as claimed.

Hillary was initially treated at a State Department facility and was transferred to her home to recover. Bill Clinton, however, insisted Hillary be flown to New York City and be treated by specialists there, Klein claims.

During her visit to the Manhattan hospital, the presumed 2016 Democratic front-runner was diagnosed with several problems, including the clots.

Hillary had a right transverse venous thrombosis, or a blood clot, between her brain and skull.

“The unique thing about clotting in the brain is that it could have transformed into a stroke,” a cardiac specialist with knowledge of Hillary’s condition says in the book.

The clots are especially a threat while flying, when blood pools while sitting, and she did a lot of flying while at the State Department. "


nypost.com...





The Reason for this Post is to Point Out the Serious Issue of Hillary Clinton's present Health . If this Women is Somehow Elected President , she will become a Liability in her Ability to Represent and Perform the Duties of a President of the United States . That Fact Alone should Disqualify her from Ever being considered for the Highest Office in the Land .