It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Christosterone
And what was the rest of her statement at the same time?
I could have sworn that you stated that you never tell a lie here recently ... what, until today?
originally posted by: Christosterone
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Christosterone
And what was the rest of her statement at the same time?
I could have sworn that you stated that you never tell a lie here recently ... what, until today?
I never lie...period
And I never use out of context clips which is tantamount to lying…
So I take offense at ur accusation and would ask you to expound upon where I was untruthful because that was not my intention, nor has it ever been..
I'm assuming you are wondering about her statement regarding "black girl magic"???
Do we need to know the context of such pandering???
Never let the facts get in the way of progressive dogma… Also, let's add her most despicable pandering of all time...I mean, wow...what the hell is she talking about??
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Christosterone
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Christosterone
And what was the rest of her statement at the same time?
I could have sworn that you stated that you never tell a lie here recently ... what, until today?
I never lie...period
And I never use out of context clips which is tantamount to lying…
So I take offense at ur accusation and would ask you to expound upon where I was untruthful because that was not my intention, nor has it ever been..
I'm assuming you are wondering about her statement regarding "black girl magic"???
Do we need to know the context of such pandering???
You just did, by omission. Possibly twice.
You claimed that my statement was "progressive dogma" and non-factual.
Here's exactly what you said:
Never let the facts get in the way of progressive dogma… Also, let's add her most despicable pandering of all time...I mean, wow...what the hell is she talking about??
So, since you're responding to my statement, in which I stated clearly what Clinton says in the relevant 2nd video you posted, and you're stating that I'm not providing facts, you are in fact, lying.
As far as your first video ... it has nothing to do with my statement or your spurious claim about my statement, and you admit that you're merely adding it on.
Speaking of facts...
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Gryphon66they may be red today but they were blue in the 1800's until after the civil war and vise versa many blue stated then were red.
originally posted by: Encryptor
a reply to: Christosterone
Do Liberals ever see the consequences of their actions?
Something tells me these shenanigans we're witnessing are about to get worse.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Christosterone
I'm not a Hillary supporter, and I don't think the first video is relevant to the point you brought up regarding a specific statement of Hillary Clinton's
You didn't read my post that you responded to? Wow, that's credible.
Then I'd bet you haven't listened to what she said in the speech either, which is pretty much exactly what I stated, beginning at 1:00 in your second video (the one that actually relates to what we're talking about).
So perhaps your post is merely ignorant of the facts, and not misrepresenting them ... however, since you demonstrate zero intent to correct your mistake, I think I'll let my statement stand.
PS: The supercilious crap you're posting at the end is just making you look more foolish if not petulant, in my opinion.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Christosterone
You're the only one insulting yourself with off-topic BS.
Did you listen to your second video from the 1:00 mark regarding Clinton's statements that you're misrepresenting?
If not, why not, if you are interested in substantiating your claim that you never lie and only deal in facts?
I'm voting against Mr. Trump. I haven't had a candidate I believe in fully in 20 years.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Christosterone
She also said she was grossly over-generalizing, so she was already admitting that her estimate of how many was not meant to be taken literally. She did not mean literally 50 percent. She meant there was a group of deplorable people supporting Trump who were racists, homophobes, xenophobes, sexists, etc, and that he "lifted them up" with his comments and positions.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Gryphon66they may be red today but they were blue in the 1800's until after the civil war and vise versa many blue stated then were red.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Christosterone
You stated that my comment was progressive lies and your own video proves that it was not.
You stated that you hadn't bothered to read my post before your knee-jerk response.
Both these facts call your claim that you never lie into serious question.
No one is interested in your attempt to divert attention away from these facts.
I am voting against Mr. Trump; I do not support any of the other candidates, one of which is a moderate right professional politician and the other two seem to be ... less than capable.
I certainly don't support the blathering, blundering adulterous alleged child-rapist Trump; as I've said, I'm voting against him.
So, are you going to actually listen to your own video and admit you were mistaken, or are you going to stand on the lie at this point?
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: kaylaluvno that is not what I am saying. But if they were more liberal they came around to what they should have been . But democrats have always been liberal and always will.