Yet more collusion to slander Trump...this is DAMNING! DNC sexual misconduct slander....

a reply to: Vasa Croe

This makes me a bit sick...they have conspired for months now on the slanderous comments about Trump and the sexual allegations apparently....From May:

A satirical Craigslist post? lol. Do you know what the Trump campaign was doing "way back in May?" Hell a Trump supporter pointed it out:

Roger Stone creates Rape PAC: Aimed at Clintons

What's most interesting about that ad that nobody seems to have even pointed out:

Must be open to public humiliation and open-press workouts if you do gain weight on the job

That's clearly a Machado reference which means Machado was in the wings the whole time just like Kathleen Willey (who is known to have lied) and Juanita Broaddrick were for Trump.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Vasa Croe

This makes me a bit sick...they have conspired for months now on the slanderous comments about Trump and the sexual allegations apparently....From May:

A satirical Craigslist post? lol. Do you know what the Trump campaign was doing "way back in May?" Hell a Trump supporter pointed it out:

Roger Stone creates Rape PAC: Aimed at Clintons

What's most interesting about that ad that nobody seems to have even pointed out:

Must be open to public humiliation and open-press workouts if you do gain weight on the job

That's clearly a Machado reference which means Machado was in the wings the whole time just like Kathleen Willey (who is known to have lied) and Juanita Broaddrick were for Trump.

Huh? So DNC folks were in cahoots with Trump?

I honestly used to really respect and read your posts on here when you first came on. I am a bit disturbed by your recent craze over anti Trump posts.

As far as the email....say what you will. It has very similar wording to what the current MSM stories are saying and was from months earlier.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Vasa Croe

This makes me a bit sick...they have conspired for months now on the slanderous comments about Trump and the sexual allegations apparently....From May:

A satirical Craigslist post? lol. Do you know what the Trump campaign was doing "way back in May?" Hell a Trump supporter pointed it out:

Roger Stone creates Rape PAC: Aimed at Clintons

What's most interesting about that ad that nobody seems to have even pointed out:

Must be open to public humiliation and open-press workouts if you do gain weight on the job

That's clearly a Machado reference which means Machado was in the wings the whole time just like Kathleen Willey (who is known to have lied) and Juanita Broaddrick were for Trump.

Huh? So DNC folks were in cahoots with Trump?

I honestly used to really respect and read your posts on here when you first came on. I am a bit disturbed by your recent craze over anti Trump posts.

As far as the email....say what you will. It has very similar wording to what the current MSM stories are saying and was from months earlier.

Ahh so THIS is why they made sure TRUMP was the republican Nominee. for a EASY WIN. Yep already had the actors,false witnesses,and scape goats lined up.

You guys do realize that Craigs List ad was intended to be a joke, right? A mean one, yes. But no one would actually confuse that with a legitimate job ad.

Christ...

a reply to: Vasa Croe

It was in the DNC leaks earlier this year, back in June/July.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Yet more collusion to slander Trump...this is DAMNING! DNC sexual misconduct slander....

Hahahahha!
Thank you for the first good laugh tonight.
Such satire!
Esquire just did a great "damn Truth about Hillary" piece. Starts off listing her birth as the original Devil!
You 'do' understand 'satire'?

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Foreign Spy - - hand selects what he wants you to read.

But, only from one side - - Hillary.

Hook, line, and sinker.

That's rich coming from someone who willfully ignores these leaks and their implications.
You don't even realize you're exactly what Bill Ivey was talking about:

And as I've mentioned, we've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking - and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Exactly.

Long before there were any allegations of the exact same thing.

Team Hillary maufactured their own self-fulfilling prophecy.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

This is a package hit-job on Trump. He made it possible by being recorded as the puzzy-man. DNC got that and then rounded up a bunch of women who have been in contact or proximity to Trump over the last 30 years. Paid them...practiced with them.


When the time was right, the war was launched. First came the puzzy-man tape, just before the 2nd debate. That conditioned/softened-up every American's mind for the parade we're experiencing now. No telling how many women are in the parade. Might be a couple of Tranny escorts to cap it all off after maybe another 10 women have been "launched" at Trump.

But after 2 or 3 more, the impact will start to fade. (Like shootings here in Chicago) Trump might even garner a ton sympathy votes, if none of these women can prove what they're alleging.

But Wiki-leaks can outlast the Clinton Campaign's assault on Trump. Assange said he had at least 100,000 "documents" coming between now and the election. Where are we now.. at 12,000 or so?

a reply to: Annee

But, only from one side - - Hillary.

Damn. Yeah , imagine that. The only person that has anything released on was the one that was stupid enough to use an unsecured email server

They are definitely playing dirty pool placing that fake ad, but seriously, if you read it, no-one of average intelligence would think it was anything but an obvious joke poking fun at Trump. Certainly nothing to be taken seriously and applied for.

They obviously thought this was bloody hysterical at the time. Pretty infantile but we are talking about junior politicians here and they have to start small before graduating to the kind of mind-bending monumental horse # we hear from the bigger dogs.

As for all the Trump groping allegations being slander? For it to legally to be considered slander it has to be a lie, and demonstrably false. I think you need to be pretty stupid to think these women are making it all up and to believe T when he says it's all 100% lies. The guy really just is insulting everyone's intelligence now.

originally posted by: angus1745
They are definitely playing dirty pool placing that fake ad, but seriously, if you read it, no-one of average intelligence would think it was anything but an obvious joke poking fun at Trump. Certainly nothing to be taken seriously and applied for.

They obviously thought this was bloody hysterical at the time. Pretty infantile but we are talking about junior politicians here and they have to start small before graduating to the kind of mind-bending monumental horse # we hear from the bigger dogs.

As for all the Trump groping allegations being slander? For it to legally to be considered slander it has to be a lie, and demonstrably false. I think you need to be pretty stupid to think these women are making it all up and to believe T when he says it's all 100% lies. The guy really just is insulting everyone's intelligence now.

Talking about walking up and grabbing someone's hoo-ha is very different than actually doing it. Not saying he wouldn't or couldn't do something like that but the accusations are baseless without any proper vetting of the accusers. As usual during this pre-election October, its always throw it out there and see what sticks, by the time its determined it was BS, it won't matter anyway. If it does come back on the DNC for releasing BS, they'll simply throw the accusers under the bus. Better to ask forgiveness than permission.

I am not getting where the collusion to slander Trump comes from reading this email. The only take away for me, is that HRC campaign had already learned about the video back in May. Obviously, they did not want to use it too soon, otherwise the GOP would have been able to replace Trump with someone that could easily snooker Hillary. Plus, with foresight, they were able to seek out individuals from Trump's past to have it roll out to diffuse attention on Hillary and wikileaks. All I see is campaign strategy at work here.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

The email says "As long as all the offensive # is verbatim I'm okay with it."

This says, to me, they wanted the accusations to be true, and "verbatim" from their sources.

They may not have had the Access Hollywood tape in the can and ready to go, but it seems they had already looked into what women said about him in the workplace. Or they may have had it and kept it quiet to use as a "nuclear option" if Trump threatened to go after Bill. Trump threw that out there as a threat during the first debate, and went after Bill after freaking out over the Miss Universe issue.

Here's the thing, just like Wikileaks, they are releasing information as they need to to both win and keep it from passing too far out of news cycles.

As to the women coming forward publicly now, I don't think that they are lying, and while I do think the Miss Universe had been "on deck," the stream of women coming forward seems to be unplanned.

I think the pile-on is due to Trump's actual behavior towards women and when one woman says something it gives permission for others to come forward - it gives courage, as does the realization that it really isn't okay for men to grope women and walk up and kiss them on the mouth without invitation.

Trump and BC are products of the sixties and seventies attitudes towards women in the style of Hugh Heffner. They are products of Playboy attitudes and power, along with a streak of incorrigibility that women are really really "over."

The two men mirror each other and we see that. Bill Clinton managed to overcome his scandals because he had exceptional political skills.He didn't go on Howard Stern and talk crap about women or sexualize his daughter. There wasn't enough ammunition, and now, he's in the backseat, and he's simply supporting his wife, so he's not a sting target. He ran a great campaign back in the day, and weathered his storms and Hillary was a very large part of that. I think she made a mistake in marrying him, not retaking the DC bar and sticking it out, but apparently she loved him enough to transform from a frumpy intellectual to a politicians polished wife. (Anyone who saw the look on Bill's face during the second debate should have seen that Trump had crossed the line and the campaign was going nuclear on him.)

Women are just so sick of being manhandled. Trump is the symbol of every guy that took an inappropriate and unwanted grab, or who used his power to push himself on women who needed to get a job, or keep a job, or who had no power in the situation.

There are "slings and arrows" headed towards him but his "outrageous fortune" is of his own making. None of this could have come out against him if he hadn't already, repeatedly, put it out there himself publicly and been inappropriate privately.

As a woman, I can't tell you how many times it happened to me, how I was taught you just had to put up with crap like that from men and how women were shamed and called whores if they dared to speak up about it.

This horror-fest of an election is so incredibly symbolic. It is the death knell for all those old attitudes and "power grabs" and the subtle oppression of women that isn't seen because men don't experience it as much. It's also good for men and boys to see that this is not acceptable behavior anymore. Hopefully it will bring some healing.

One thing to remember also, how a candidate runs his or her campaign is a sign of their leadership style, their grasp of strategy, their ability to work with others to get things done, etc. Trump's campaign has been all bluster and little ground-game. It's been disorganized. It spent it's money on "product" to sell and the pageantry/entertainment of rallies. Hillary has a very organized campaign. Not only that but you can see the strategy built into it in these emails. It is said that she is far better at governing than running a campaign and being in the limelight.

Would you want a Presidency of Pagentry but that's disorganized, reactionary, hair-triggered and crushes Journalistic reporting so you can't see the man behind the curtain isn't really the All Powerful Trump? I think he would be a disaster. /shrug

a reply to: Vasa Croe

The campaign involves a Clinton. She is going to lie cheat and steal every vote she can in order to get elected.

a reply to: Gothmog

Her server wasn't what was hacked.

The airplane grope story is falling apart already. No armrest on first class. Witness talks about the event and how she was coming on to him.

NYT will settle after the election just like when they did this same thing with mccain.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Now all you have to do is post a screenshot of the actual listing on Craigslist to prove that it wasn't just another inside joke.

originally posted by: jellyrev
The airplane grope story is falling apart already. No armrest on first class. Witness talks about the event and how she was coming on to him.

NYT will settle after the election just like when they did this same thing with mccain.

They SAY there wasn't an armrest, but there was (journalists dug that up). The "witness" would have been 18 at the time in first class and this woman somehow confided to him everything? He's a shady guy. I'm guessing HE will start to fall apart as a "witness" soon.

The only people who will not see through this guy are the ones who are so invested in Trump that they can't help but believe him over anyone or any fact.

originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: Gothmog

Her server wasn't what was hacked.

The FBI says otherwise.