Maybe I'll vote for Evan McMullin! Let's talk about this.

Now, I really do not like the idea of a guy that get's the least votes to be the one who becomes president, but this election truly makes most all other people better choices than what we have. Evan McMullin has been becoming more and more popular in Utah, due to the fact that he could block both Hillary, and Donald from getting the presidency - And may even have a chance at being selected by the House once it comes to said vote.

What do you think of this, fellow members? It's desperate - But I think it's actually quite possible.

Is it worth it? If so, why not give it a try? A very small percentage of the Electoral College could make all the difference in this matter.

Hmm, I like his approach. Could be a distraction from all this fluff debacle. Good to see another contender.

a reply to: breakingbs

Agreed, I vehemently oppose both contenders. I haven't learned much about this guy - Seems like a typical conservative party runner, but no smoking guns or very negative things so far. Anyone feel free to weigh in if you know something great, or bad about this guy ( then again, his contenders are a narcissistic billionaire sexual predator and a international-bribed psychopath so... )

a reply to: deadlyhope
I believe it was ex-cia and working for Goldman Sachs were his old jobs. He tries to hide them now I believe. MR. Establishment himself.

a reply to: jellyrev

Hmm, that is some bad news - Everyone is linked to Goldman Sachs. Can someone just take this company to court and shut them down or something? Nearly all important positions are held by people bribed, owned, paid by GS.

edit - I forget, the judges are owned by them too... *sigh*

a reply to: deadlyhope

Yea he is a vote siphon, he's mormon so he got that mormon vote on lockdown, tsk tsk identity politics, and Plan C is to deadlock the electoral college and have the reps vote this guy in.

a reply to: deadlyhope

I don't believe this stuff in the news about trump per se, but I think that he could stand to apologize, wait, rather, clarify that it's not ok to talk like it in office, but seems we're stuck on all this other..

But I've left *that* alone and am getting to other you know ACTUAL ISSUES. Insider connections on both sides???

Hmm. This thing with Goldman Sachs. Keeps coming up. Disappointing. Is there anyone whose name doesn't come up in connection to this??

a reply to: deadlyhope

I don't know. I'd vote Libertarian, but they aren't representing libertarian values this time around. I'm actually thinking about writing in Jeffrey Epstein. How many disgruntled citizens do you think it would take to send a message, by calling one of the bigger skeletons to come out of the closet?

originally posted by: deadlyhope
a reply to: jellyrev

Hmm, that is some bad news - Everyone is linked to Goldman Sachs. Can someone just take this company to court and shut them down or something? Nearly all important positions are held by people bribed, owned, paid by GS.

edit - I forget, the judges are owned by them too... *sigh*

You just described precisely why no one can take them down.

Have you considered voting for Limberbutt McCubbins?

originally posted by: jellyrev
a reply to: deadlyhope
I believe it was ex-cia and working for Goldman Sachs were his old jobs. He tries to hide them now I believe. MR. Establishment himself.

Mr CLean.... my arse... don't fall for this guy... Isn't it amazing how this guy get's on all the MSM networks when he wasn't even in the race to begin with?

hmmmmm....

Just say no to [redacted] YMMV


removed altered candidate name.. my bad...