It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Donald Trump just lost his lead in the only major national poll left to show him ahead
page: 2share:
a reply to: Sillyolme
La times maybe tied, but you don't want to talk about the 7 point gain on the rasmussen poll? Why the big gain in that poll then?
Do you actually go into the data about the polls? Or do you just look at the percentage and go ok that's all I need.....
Because if you look into the polling data you can clearly see there are more democrats being sampled then Republicans and even in cases independents are sampled more then the Republicans..... So of course those polls are going to show Clinton ahead. I wonder what the polls would be like if all parties are sampled evenly oh that's right you get polls where Trump is winning. Mmm makes me think.
Plus with the Wikileaks emails through out the early stages of the primaries, democratic staff members talk about how there are alot of Trump supporter's who won't say they are voting Trump in public but when asked anonymously its a different story. They talk about the same thing happening with Regan and Arnold Schwarzenegger, when they were running the polls had them down because of the same thing happening to Trump now.
I'll say it again 500-1000 people are not a proper representation of all voters. Especially when one party is being sampled more then the other.
La times maybe tied, but you don't want to talk about the 7 point gain on the rasmussen poll? Why the big gain in that poll then?
Do you actually go into the data about the polls? Or do you just look at the percentage and go ok that's all I need.....
Because if you look into the polling data you can clearly see there are more democrats being sampled then Republicans and even in cases independents are sampled more then the Republicans..... So of course those polls are going to show Clinton ahead. I wonder what the polls would be like if all parties are sampled evenly oh that's right you get polls where Trump is winning. Mmm makes me think.
Plus with the Wikileaks emails through out the early stages of the primaries, democratic staff members talk about how there are alot of Trump supporter's who won't say they are voting Trump in public but when asked anonymously its a different story. They talk about the same thing happening with Regan and Arnold Schwarzenegger, when they were running the polls had them down because of the same thing happening to Trump now.
I'll say it again 500-1000 people are not a proper representation of all voters. Especially when one party is being sampled more then the other.
Polls don't reflect the electoral college that actually decides who will be elected POTUS.
I don't believe polls but I do believe British odds makers. Trump can't get enough EC votes to pull it off; without a majority of women and minorities and educated caucs. It's over for the orange one...believe me!
electionbettingodds.com...
I don't believe polls but I do believe British odds makers. Trump can't get enough EC votes to pull it off; without a majority of women and minorities and educated caucs. It's over for the orange one...believe me!
electionbettingodds.com...
new topics
-
Claim: General Mark Milley Approved Heat and Sound Directed Energy Weapons During 2020 Riots
Whistle Blowers and Leaked Documents: 1 hours ago