Trump Accused Of Raping 13-Year-Old Girl: Lawsuit From Casey Anthony Attorney Allowed In Fed Court

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Hope it isn't.

a reply to: JinMI

Waste tax payers money on a BS case...great

a reply to: ksiezyc

The involvement of this one man doesn't mean that the women's claims are false, does it? By that logic, Donald Trump is a hoax created by Roger Stone. I guess you also don't know who he is either or what his involvement has been with the Clinton accusers?

You think some Jerry Springer producer is bad, really? Get a rough idea of Roger Stone.

At any rate, you might also want to read this: Revelist - I talked to the woman accusing Donald Trump of rape

That'll give you some context.

originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Hope it isn't.

Why do you hope it isn't heard?

Do you not believe in our justice system?

Correction to the OP edit:

It's one new attorney (Cheney Mason) not two. As I was looking for information on the other attorney, Thomas Francis Meagher, I realized he was the patent lawyer I was referring to in my second post in the thread (I'd forgotten his name).

Trumps just suing everyone. Everyone suing back. Hilarious.

So it is fine to accuse Bill Clinton but not Trump?. I get it.

While real scandals are being leaked daily about Clinton's political corruption and illegal acts while using the US government as a springboard, all the MSM can focus on are these conveniently timed scandals about Trump from decades ago.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Something tells me anyone in a position of power has this sort of collateral hanging over them- Its how they keep everyone playing ball and abiding by Cabal rules

a reply to: Konduit

There's nothing more conveniently timed than WikiLeaks releases.

They'll definitely have a ton of character witnesses for the prosecution!

a reply to: theantediluvian

At least Wikileaks has some merit to it. Speaking of which, I find your threads to be conveniently timed.

When Trump's taxes were the talking point, you post nothing but threads about Trump's taxes. When "pussy talk" was the talking point, that was your shtick. And now... it's pretty obvious at this point.

Some might call you another talking head repeating the narrative he's been handed.

a reply to: IsntLifeFunny

what they'll have is a video tape of trump claiming he goes around just grabbing women by the ......

even if the tape isn't actually allowed into the trial as evidence, it's really gonna be real hard to find someone who hasn't heard it or heard about it. including the judge.

like I keep saying, he is blasting hillary about poor judgement, him going around and saying such things, regardless of weather he knew it was taped or not, or who he was saying it to, is really poor, poor judgement!!

a reply to: Konduit

Some may call you a blind follower.
It is fine when people are accusing Clinton but not Trump why is that?.
Oh and before you start I don't like either and I'm surprised any ATS member follows these two.
Why believe one and not the other when they are probably both as bad?....but both deserve their day in court to clear their name.
www.bbc.co.uk...

a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

I'm not saying either of them is innocent, and nobody is accusing Clinton, it's right there in black and white.

I just see a complete media pile-on against one candidate while the other is getting a free pass on the most corrupt political scandals to have been exposed in decades.

You don't see the double standards? It's ironic that hackers are breaking the years biggest stories while journalists are trying to cover them up.

a reply to: Konduit

I agree but people think Trump will be different he will not.
I think you guys in the streets should be rioting seeing the two people they have manufactured to run.
We are all so screwed.

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: IsntLifeFunny

what they'll have is a video tape of trump claiming he goes around just grabbing women by the ......

even if the tape isn't actually allowed into the trial as evidence, it's really gonna be real hard to find someone who hasn't heard it or heard about it. including the judge.

like I keep saying, he is blasting hillary about poor judgement, him going around and saying such things, regardless of weather he knew it was taped or not, or who he was saying it to, is really poor, poor judgement!!

Let's not forget the statements of all the women saying he has groped them.

I hate to say it but Alex Jones said something like this was going to happen. He mentioned it coming out and not going to court until after the election and It would probably be dropped after the polls.

My thought is, the expensive lawyer would be an excellent way to really sell it. No one would doubt it, that lawyers reputation and all that. Few mil to file a lawsuit then drop it in a few months... Easy money. In a few months people would forget about it and it'll be business as usual.


www.infowars.com...


Edit I know it's Alex Jones.. But a broken clock is always right twice a day. Right?

originally posted by: JinMI
Not accusing or defending here but from her statement (Jane Doe) says:

Defendant Trump had sexual contact with me at four different parties in the summer

and

Defendant Epstein had sexual contact

Why would/did she subject herself so many times that summer?

If she was only 13 at the time, she wouldn't have had much choice in the matter. Where were her parents though, when all of this was going on?

a reply to: tigertatzen

I don't know where her parents were or if there was anyone else she could go to.